Abstract
Following Schelling (1960), coordination problems have mainly been considered in a context where agents can achieve a common goal (e.g., rendezvous) only by taking common actions. Dynamic versions of this problem have been studied by Crawford and Haller (1990), Ponssard (1994), and Kramarz (1996). This paper considers an alternative dynamic formulation in which the common goal (dispersion) can only be achieved by agents taking distinct actions. The goal of spatial dispersion has been studied in static models of habitat selection, location or congestion games, and network analysis. Our results show how this goal can be achieved gradually, by indistinguishable non-communicating agents, in a dynamic setting.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Alpern, S. (1976), Games of search. Seminar, Institute for Advanced Study, Vienna. July.
Alpern, S. (1995), The rendezvous search problem. SIAM J. Control & Optimization, 33 673–683.
Anderson, E. J. and Weber, R. R. (1990), The rendezvous problem on discrete locations, Journal of Applied Probability 28, 839–851.
Blume, A. (2000), Coordination and learning with a partial language, Journal of Economic Theory 95 1–36.
Crawford, V. P. and Haller, H. (1990), Learning how to cooperate: optimal play in repeated coordination games, Econometrica 58(3): 571–596.
Fretwell, S. D. and Lucas, H. L. (1970), On territorial behaviour and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. I. Theoretical development. Acta Biotheor. 19: 16–36.
Gabszewicz, J. and Thisse, J.-F. (1992), Location. Chapter 9, in: R. Aumann and S. Hart (eds.), Handbook of Game Theory, Volume 1, Elsevier.
Gal, S. (1980), Search Games. Academic Press, New York.
Gal, S. (1999), Rendezvous search on the line. Operations Research47(6): 974–976.
Goyal, S. and Janssen, M. (1996), Can we rationally learn to coordinate, Theory and Decision 40: 29–49.
Grotshel, M. Lovasz, L. and Schrijver, A. (1988), Geometric Algorithrithms and Combinatorial Optimization. Berlin, Springer.
Hall, M. Jr. (1967), Combinatorial Theory. Blaisdell Publishing Company.
Haurie, A. and Marcotte, A. (1985), On the relationship between Nash-Cournot and Wardrop equilibria. Networks 15: 295–308.
Houston, A. and McNamara, J. (1997), Patch choice and population size, Evolutionary Ecology 11: 703–722.
Konishi, H., Le Breton, M. and Weber, S. (1997), Equilibria in a model with partial rivalry, Journal of Economic Theory 72: 225–237.
Kramarz, F. (1996), Dynamic focal points in N-person coordination games. Theory and Decision, 40: 277–313.
Mortensen, D. T. and Pissarides, C. A. (1999), New developments in models of search in the labor market. in: O.C. Ashenfelter and D. Card (eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics, Amsterdam: North-Holland. 2567–2627.
Palfrey, T. (1984), Spatial equilibrium with entry, Review of Economic Studies 51: 139–156.
Ponssard, J.-P. (1994), Formalisation des connaissances, apprentisage organisationnel et rationalité interactive (Chap. 7) in: A Orléan (ed.), Analyse Economiques des Conventions, P.U.F., Paris.
Schelling, T. (1960), The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Alpern, S., Reyniers, D.J. Spatial Dispersion as a Dynamic Coordination Problem. Theory and Decision 53, 29–59 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020891631738
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020891631738