Skip to main content
Log in

Corporate Social Responsibility in Transnational Spaces: Exploring Influences of Varieties of Capitalism on Expressions of Corporate Codes of Conduct in Nigeria

Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Drawing from the varieties of capitalism theoretical framework, the study explores the home country influences of multinational corporations (MNCs) on their corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices when they operate outside their national/regional institutional contexts. The study focusses on a particular CSR practice (i.e. corporate expressions of code of conducts) of seven MNCs from three varieties of capitalism – coordinated (2), mixed (2) and liberal (3) market economies – operating in the oil and gas sector of the Nigerian economy. The study concludes that the corporate codes of conduct of these MNCs operating in Nigeria, to a large extent, reflect the characteristics of their home countries’ model of capitalism, respectively, albeit with certain degree of modifications. The home countries’ model of capitalism is also found to have implications for the degree of adaptability of these MNCs’ CSR practices to the Nigerian institutional context – with the mixed market economy model of capitalism adapting more flexibly than the liberal and coordinated market economies, respectively. The findings of this study will contribute to the emerging literature on the institutional embeddedness of CSR practices in transnational social spaces, understanding of varieties of capitalism, and CSR in developing economies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aguilera, R. (2005). Corporate Governance and Director Accountability: an Institutional Comparative Perspective, British Journal of Management 16 (1), 39–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, D. E., Williams, C. A., and Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the S Back in Corporate Social Responsibility: A Multilevel Theory of Social Change in Organizations. The Academy of Management Review, 32(3): 836 – 863.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aguilera, R. V., Williams, C.A., Conley, J. M. and Rupp, D. E. (2006). Corporate Governance and Social Responsibility: a comparative analysis of the UK and the US, Corporate Governance: An International Review 14 (3), 147–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amable, B. (2003). The Diversity of Modern Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Amadi, S., M. Germiso and A. Henriksen: 2006, Statoil in Nigeria: Transparency and Local Content, Report Number 1/2006 (Framtiden, I vare hender, Oslo)

  • Amaeshi, K.: 2007, ‘Exploring the Institutional Embeddedness of Corporate Stakeholding and Social Responsibility: A Comparative Political Economy Perspective’, Unpublished PhD Thesis, Warwick Business School, University of Warwick

  • Amaeshi, K., Adi, B. C., Ogechie, C. and Amao, O. O. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility in Nigeria: Indigenous practices or Western influences?, Journal of Corporate Citizenship (winter edition) 24: 83-99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bethoux, E., Didry, C., and Mias, A. (2007). What Codes of Conduct Tell Us: corporate social responsibility and the nature of Multinational Corporation. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15 (1): 77-90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why Would Corporations Behave in Socially Responsible Ways? An Institutional Theory of Corporate Social Responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3):946-967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carasco, E.F. and Singh, J.B. (2003).The Content and Focus of Codes of Ethics of the World’s Largest Transnational Corporations’ Business and Society Review, 108 : 71-94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapple, W. and J-P. Gond: 2006. Varieties of Corporate Social Responsibility and Varieties of Capitalism. Paper prepared for the International Centre for Corporate Social Responsibility (ICCSR) Annual Symposium, Nottingham, September

  • Crouch, C. and H. Farrell: 2004, ‘Breaking the Path of Institutional Development? Alternatives to the New Determinism’, Rationality and Society 16(1), 5–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, C., M. Schröder and H. Voelzkow: Forthcoming, ‘Regional and Sectoral Varieties of Capitalism’, Economy and Society (Special Issue on Capitalist Diversity and Diversity within Capitalism)

  • DesJardins, J. (1998). Corporate environmental responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(8):825 – 838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. J. and Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2):147-160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dore, R. (2000). Stock Market Capitalism: Welfare Capitalism, Japan and Germany versus the Anglo-Saxons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eide, A., H. O. Bergesen and P. R. Goyer: 2000, Human Rights and the Oil Industry (Intersentia, Norway)

  • Estevez-Abe, M., Iversen, T., and Soskice, D. (2001). Social protection and the formation of skills: a reinterpretation of the welfare state. In: P. Hall and D. Soskice (Eds), Varieties of Capitalism. The Institutional Foundations of comparative institutional advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 145-183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forcese, C. (1997). Commerce with Conscience? Human Rights and Business Codes of Conduct. Montreal: International Centre for Human Rights and Democratic Development, Montreal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, M.S. (1989). Professional Codes: Why, How, and with what Impact?. Journal of Business Ethics, 8: 109-115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frynas, J. G. (2005). The false development promise of Corporate Social Responsibility: evidence from multinational oil companies. International Affairs 81 (3): 581-598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frynas, J. G., Mellahi, K., and Pigman, G. A. (2006). First mover advantages in international business and firm-specific political resources, Strategic Management Journal, 27:321 – 345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamble, A and G. Kelly: 2000, The Politics of the Company (Hart Publishing, Oxford, Portland)

  • Gaumnitz, B. and J. C. Lere, (2002). Contents of Codes of Ethics of Professional Business Organizations in the United States. Journal of Business Ethics 35(1): 35-49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geppert, M., Matten, D., and Walgenbach, P. (2006). Transnational institution building and the multinational corporation: An emerging field of research Human Relations, 59: 1451-1465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A., (2000). The third way and its critics. Malden, Mass: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goyer, M. (2006). Varieties of Institutional Investors and National Models of Capitalism: The Transformation of Corporate Governance in France and Germany. Politics & Society, 34(3): 399-430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M.: 1985, ‘Economic Action and Social Structure: A Theory of Embeddedness’, American Journal of Sociology 91(3), 481–510

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, J. J. and J. Weber: 2006, ‘Industry Social Analysis: Examining the Beer Industry', Business & Society 45, 413–440

  • Hall, P. A. and Soskice, D.(Eds) (2001). Varieties of Capitalism – The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancke, B., Rhodes, M., and Thatcher, M. (2007). Introduction: beyond varieties of capitalism. IN: B. Hancke, M. Rhodes and M. Thatcher (Eds.), Beyond Varieties of Capitalism: conflict, contradictions, and complementarities in the European economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, C., Harley, B., and Phillips, N. (2004). Discourse Analysis and Content Analysis: Two Solitudes? Qualitative Methods, 2(1):19-22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husted, B. W. and Allen, D. B. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in the multinational enterprise: strategic and institutional approaches. Journal of International Business, 37: 838-849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ite, U. (2004). Multinationals and Corporate Social Responsibility in Developing Countries: A Case Study of Nigeria. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 11(1):1-11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, G. (2005). Stakeholders under Pressure: corporate governance and labour management in Germany and Japan, Corporate Governance: An International Review 13 (3), 419–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. T. (1999). The institutional determinants of social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 20:163-179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jose, A. and Lee, S. (2007). Environmental Reporting of Global Corporations: A Content Analysis based on Website Disclosures. Journal of Business Ethics, 72(4):307-321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konzelmann S J,Wilkinson F, Craypo C and Aridi R. (2005). The export of national varieties of capitalism: the case of Wal-Mart and IKEA. WP 314, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostova, T., and Roth, K. (2002). Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: institutional and relational effects. Academy of management Journal, 45(1):215-233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, C. C. and B. B. Schlegelmich: 1990, Do Corporate Codes of Ethics Reflect National Character? Evidence from Europe and the United State. Journal of International Business Studies 4th Quarter: 519–536

  • Lehrer, M. (2001). Macro-varieties of capitalism and micro-varieties of strategic management in European airlines. In: P. Hall and D. Soskice (Eds), Varieties of Capitalism. The Institutional Foundations of comparative institutional advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.361-386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lounsbury, M.: 2008, ‘Institutional Rationality and Practice Variation: New Directions in the Institutional Analysis of Practice’, Accounting, Organizations and Society 33(4–5), 349–361

    Google Scholar 

  • Matten, D. (2003). Symbolic Politics in Environmental Regulation: Corporate Strategic Responses. Business Strategy and the Environment, 12 (1):26-37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matten, D. and Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “Explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review. 33 (2): 404-424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W., and Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology 83: 340-363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monteiro, L. F., Arvidsson, N. and Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Knowledge Flows Within Multinational Corporations: Explaining Subsidiary Isolation and Its Performance Implications. Organization Science, 19(1): 90 - 107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon, J. (2002). The Social Responsibility of Business and New Governance. Government and Opposition, 37(3):385-408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD: 2001, ‘Codes of Corporate Conduct: Expanded Review of Their Contents’, in OECD 2001, Corporate Responsibility: Private Initiatives and Public Goals, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, pp. 47–71

  • Owen, D. L., Swift, T. A., Humphrey, C. and Bowerman, M. C. (2000). The new social audits: accountability, managerial capture or the agenda of social champions? European Accounting Review, 9(1):81-98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panitch, L. and Gindin, S. (2005). Euro-capitalism and American Empire. In: D. Coates (ed.), Varieties of Capitalism, Varieties of Approaches. Houndmills Basingstoke, UK and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.139-59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salahuddin, S. and J. Tsoi: 2003, Ethical Practices and Codes of Conduct Amongst Retailers in Hong Kong. The Centre of Urban Planning and Environmental Management, The University of Hong Kong, Corporate Environmental Governance Programme, Project Report 9

  • Schwartz, M.S. (2001). A Code of Ethics for Corporate Code of Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 41: 27-43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soskice, D. (2007). Macroeconomics and varieties of capitalism. In: B. Hancke, M. Rhodes and M. Thatcher (Eds.), Beyond Varieties of Capitalism: conflict, contradictions, and complementarities in the European economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 89-121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starik, M. (1994). What is a Stakeholder? Essay by Mark Starik. Pp. 89-95 of the Toronto Conference: Reflections on Stakeholder Theory, Business & Society 33:82-131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starik, M. (1995). Should trees have managerial standing? Toward stakeholder status for nonhuman nature. Journal of Business Ethics, 14:207-218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, J. and D. Tan: 2005, ‘Environment – Strategy Co Evolution and Co Alignment: A Staged-Model of Chinese SOEs Under Transition’, Strategic Management Journal 26(2), 141–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Tate, J. (2001). National varieties of standardization. In: P. Hall and D. Soskice (Eds), Varieties of Capitalism. The Institutional Foundations of comparative institutional advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 442-473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tempel, A., and Walgenbach, P. (2007). Global standardization of organizational forms and management practices? What new institutionalism and the business-systems approach can learn from each other. Journal of Management Studies, 44:1-24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitols, S. (2001). Varieties of corporate governance: comparing Germany and the UK. In: P. A. Hall and D. Soskice (Eds.). Varieties of Capitalism: the institutional foundations of comparative advantage, Oxford: Oxford University Press pp. 337-360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, R. (1998). Internationalization and varieties of capitalism: the limited effects of cross-national coordination of economic activities on the nature of business systems. Review of International Political Economy, 5(3): 445-481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, R. (1999). Divergent Capitalisms. The Social Structuring and Change of Business Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittington, R. (2006). Completing the practice turn in strategy research. Organization Studies, 27(5):613-634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, S. (2001). Business, government, and patterns of labor market policy in Britain and the Federal Republic of Germany. In: P. Hall and D. Soskice (Eds), Varieties of Capitalism. The Institutional Foundations of comparative institutional advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.247-274.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenneth Amaeshi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Amaeshi, K., Amao, O.O. Corporate Social Responsibility in Transnational Spaces: Exploring Influences of Varieties of Capitalism on Expressions of Corporate Codes of Conduct in Nigeria. J Bus Ethics 86 (Suppl 2), 225–239 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0192-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0192-z

Keywords

Navigation