Abstract
The paper argues against the polarisation of the health economics literature into pro- and anti-QALY camps. In particular, we suggest that a crucial distinction should be made between the QALY measure as a metric of health, and QALY maximisation as an applied social choice rule. We argue against the rule but for the measure and that the appropriate conceptualisation of health-care rationing decisions should see the main task as the integration of competing and possibly incommensurable normative claim types. We identify the main types as consequences, rights, social contracts, individual votes and community values and note situations in which the contribution of each claim type is limited. We go on to show that the integration of (at least some of) these claim types can be formalised within the mathematical framework provided by non-linear programming.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anand, P. and Wailoo, A. (1999) Utilities vs Rights to Publicly Provided Goods: Arguments and Evidence from Health-Care Rationing. Discussion Paper, The Open University.
Bell, D. (1993) Communitarianism and its Critics. Oxford: OUP.
Buchanan, A. (1984) The Right to a Decent Minimum of Health Care. Philosophy and Public Affairs 13, 55–78.
Buckingham, K. (1993) A Note of HYE (Healthy Years Equivalent). Journal of Health Economics 11, 301–309.
Daniels, N. (1993) Rationing Fairly. Bioethics 7, 224–233.
Dolan, P. and Cookson, R. (1999) Biases, Prejudices and Souffle. Paper given to the Birmingham Health Economics Study Group Meeting, UK.
Dworkin, R. (1977) Taking Rights Seriously. London: Duckworth.
Flynn, R. and Williams, G. (1997) Contracting for Health. Oxford: OUP.
Klein, R. (1994) Can We Restrict the Health Care Menu? Health Policy 27, 103–122.
Mehrez, A. and Gafni, A. (1989) Quality-Adjusted Life-Years, Utility Theory and Health-Years Equivalents. Medical Decision-Making 9, 142–149.
Mooney, G. (1998) 'Communitarian Claims' as an Ethical Basis for Allocating Health Care Resources. Social Science and Medicine 47, 1133–1398.
Mooney, G. and Jan, S. (1997) Vertical Equity: Weighting Outcomes? Or Establishing Procedures? Health Policy 39, 79–87.
Morrison, G. C. (undated) Values Utilities, HYEs and QALYs. University of St Andrews, CRIEFF Discussion Paper, UK.
Nelson, J. L. (1994) Publicity and Pricelessness: Grassroots Decisionmaking and Justice in Rationing. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19, 333–342.
Nord, E. (1993) The Relevance of Health State After Treatment in Prioritizing Between Different Patients. Journal of Medical Ethics 19, 37–42.
Nord, E. Richardson, J., Street, A., Kuhse, H. and Singer, P. (1995) Maximising Health Benefits vs. Egalitarianism. Social Science and Medicine 41, 1429–1437.
Oberholzer-Gee, Bohnet I. and Frey, B. S. (1997), Fairness and Competence in Democratic Decisions. Public Choice 91, 89–105.
Redmayne, S. (1995) Reshaping the NHS. Birmingham: NAHAT.
Sen, A. K. (1985) Commodities and Capabilities. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Sen, A. K. (1979) Personal Utilities and Public Judgements. Economic Journal 89, 537–558.
Wagstaff, A. (1991) QALYS and Equity Efficiency Trade-Off. Journal of Health Economics 10, 21–41.
Williams, A. (1992) Cost-Effectiveness Analysis - is it Ethical? Journal of Medical Ethics 18, 7–11.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Anand, P. QALYS and the Integration of Claims in Health-Care Rationing. Health Care Analysis 7, 239–253 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009405608702
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009405608702