oa Arguing through quotations

References

1. Andone, Corina and Alfonso LomelíHernández, J.
   2019 “Scientific arguments in policy-making.” Journal of Argumentation in Context8 (2): 195–213. 10.1075/jaic.18040.and
   https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.18040.and [Google Scholar]
2. Andone, Corina , and Sara Greco
   2018 “Evading the Burden of Proof in European Union Soft Law Instruments: the Case of Commission Recommendations.” International Journal for the Semiotics of Law31 (1): 79–99. 10.1007/s11196‑017‑9527‑8
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-017-9527-8 [Google Scholar]
3. Bublitz, Wolfram
   2015 “Introducing quoting as a ubiquitous meta-communicative act.” InThe Pragmatics of Quoting Now and Then, ed. By Jenny Arendholz , Wolfram Bublitz , and Monika Kirner-Ludwig , 1–28. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110427561‑002
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110427561-002 [Google Scholar]
4. Catenaccio, Paola
   2008 “Press releases as a hybrid genre: Addressing the informative/promotional conundrum.” Pragmatics18 (1): 9–31. 10.1075/prag.18.1.02cat
   https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.18.1.02cat [Google Scholar]
5. Coman-Kund, Florin , and Corina Andone
   2019 “European Commission’s soft law instruments: In between legally binding and non-binding norms. InLawmaking in Multi-level Settings, Patricia Popelier , Helen Xantaki , JoséTiago Silveira , Franz Ulhmann and William Robinson (eds.), 183–208. Oxford: Hart-Nomos Publishing. 10.5771/9783748900863‑173
   https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748900863-173 [Google Scholar]
6. Cummings, Louise
   2010 Rethinking the BSE Crisis. A Study of Scientific Reasoning under Uncertainty. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑90‑481‑9504‑6
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9504-6 [Google Scholar]
7. Cummings, Louise
   2014 “The “trust” heuristic: Arguments from authority in public health.” Health Communication29 (10): 1043–1056. 10.1080/10410236.2013.831685
   https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2013.831685 [Google Scholar]
8. Cummings, Louise
   2015 Reasoning and Public Health: New Ways of Coping with Uncertainty. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑15013‑0
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15013-0 [Google Scholar]
9. De Wilde, Pieter
   2019 “Media logic and grand theories of European integration.” Journal of European Public Policy26 (8): 1193–1212. 10.1080/13501763.2019.1622590
   https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1622590 [Google Scholar]
10. Fetzer, Anita
    2020a “Doing things with quotes: Introduction.” Journal of Pragmatics157: 84–88. 10.1016/j.pragma.2020.01.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.01.001 [Google Scholar]
11. Fetzer, Anita
    2020b “’And I quote’: Forms and functions of quotations in Prime Minister’s questions.” Journal of Pragmatics157: 89–100. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.05.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.05.004 [Google Scholar]
12. Gleissner, Martin , and Claes De Vreese
    2005 “News about the EU Constitution: Journalistic challenges and media portrayals of the European Union Constitution.” Journalism6 (2): 221–242. 10.1177/1464884905051010
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884905051010 [Google Scholar]
13. Grimmelikhuijsen, Stephan , Femke de Vries , and Wilte Zijlstra
    2018 “Breaking bad news without breaking trust: The effects of a press release and newspaper coverage on perceived trustworthiness.” Journal of Behavioral Public Administration1 (1): 1–10. 10.30636/jbpa.11.16
    https://doi.org/10.30636/jbpa.11.16 [Google Scholar]
14. Jacobs, Geert
    1999 Preformulating the News: An Analysis of the Meta-pragmatics of Press Releases. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.60
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.60 [Google Scholar]
15. Lindholm, Maria
    2008 “A community text pattern in the European Commission press release? A generic and genetic view.” Pragmatics18 (1): 33–58. 10.1075/prag.18.1.03lin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.18.1.03lin [Google Scholar]
16. Meyer, Christoph
    1999 “Political legitimacy and the indivisibility of politics: Exploring the European Union’s communication deficit.” Journal of Common Market Studies37 (4): 617–639. 10.1111/1468‑5965.00199
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00199 [Google Scholar]
17. Pander Maat, Henk
    2008 “Editing and genre conflict: How newspaper journalists clarify and neutralize press release copy.” Pragmatics18 (1): 87–115. 10.1075/prag.18.1.05pan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.18.1.05pan [Google Scholar]
18. Sissons, Helen
    2012 “Journalism and public relations. A tale of two discourses.” Discourse and communication6 (3): 271–294. 10.1177/1750481312452202
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481312452202 [Google Scholar]
19. Sleurs, Kim , Geert Jacobs , and Luuk Van Waes
    2003 “Constructing press releases, constructing quotations: A case study.” Journal of Sociolinguistics7 (2): 192–212. 10.1111/1467‑9481.00219
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00219 [Google Scholar]
20. Stefan, Oana
    2013 Soft Law in Court. Competition Law, State Aid and the Court of Justice of the European Union. Alphen aan de Rijn: Wolters Kluwer.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Stefan, Oana
    2020 “The Future of European Union Soft Law: A Research and Policy Agenda for the Aftermath of Covid-19.” Journal of International and Comparative Law7 (2): 329–350. 10.2139/ssrn.3702534
    https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3702534 [Google Scholar]
22. Terpan, Fabien
    2015 “Soft Law in the European Union – the Changing Nature of EU Law.” European Law Journal21 (1): 68–96. 10.1111/eulj.12090
    https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12090 [Google Scholar]
23. van Eemeren, Frans H.
    2016 “Identifying argumentative patterns: A vital step in the development of pragma-dialectics.” Argumentation30 (1): 1–23. 10.1007/s10503‑015‑9377‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-015-9377-z [Google Scholar]
24. van Eemeren, Frans H.
    (ed.) 2017 Prototypical Argumentative Patterns. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/aic.11
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.11 [Google Scholar]
25. van Eemeren, Frans H.
    2018 Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑95381‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95381-6 [Google Scholar]
26. Walton, Douglas
    2000 Scare Tactics. Arguments that Appeal to Fears and Threats. Dordrecht: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Case C-16/16P
    Case C-16/16PBelgium v CommissionEU:C:2018:79.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Opinion of Advocate General Villalón
    Opinion of Advocate General Villalón 2015 Opinion of 14 January 2015 Case C-62/14Gauweiler and othersEUCLI:EU:C:2015:7.
    [Google Scholar]
29. European Commission
    European Commission 2003 Style guide for press releases. Brussels: DG Press and Communication, European Commission.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Commission Recommendation 2011/711/EU of 27 October 2011 on the digitisation and online accessibility of cultural material and digital preservation
    Commission Recommendation 2011/711/EU of 27 October 2011 on the digitisation and online accessibility of cultural material and digital preservation, OJ L 283/39.
31. European Commission
    European Commission 2020 Strategic Plan 2020–2024. DG Communication. Ref. Ares(2020)6501662-09/11/2020.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Press release ‘A Europe that protects: Commission reinforces EU response to illegal content online.’ IP/18/1169.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Commission Recommendation C(2019) 2335 final of 26 March 2019 on cybersecurity of 5G networks.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Commission Recommendation C(2019) 7131 final of 8 October 2019 establishing a common “Practical Handbook for Border Guards” to be used by Member States’ competent authorities when carrying out the border control of persons and replacing Commission Recommendation C(2006) 5186 of 6 November 2006.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Press release ‘Secure 5G networks: Commission endorses EU toolbox and sets out next steps.’ IP/20/123.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Van den Brande, L.
    2017 Reaching out to EU citizens. A new opportunity. ‘About us, with us, for us’. Report of the European Commission.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Interview
    Interview. DG COMM, 21November 2019.
    [Google Scholar]