Skip to main content
Log in

I Want What She’s Having

Evidence of Human Mate Copying

  • Published:
Human Nature Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A variety of non-human females do not select male partners independently. Instead they favor males having previous associations with other females, a phenomenon known as mate copying. This paper investigates whether humans also exhibit mate copying and whether consistent positive information about a man’s mate value, and a woman’s age and self-perceived mate value (SPMV), influence her tendency to copy the mate choices of others. Female university students (N = 123) rated the desirability of photographed men pictured alone or with one, two, or five women represented by silhouettes. In accordance with the visual arrays, men were described as currently in a romantic relationship; having previously been in one, two, or five relationships; or not having had a romantic relationship in the past 4 years. Women generally rated men pictured with one or two previous partners as more desirable than those with none. Men depicted with five previous partners, however, were found to be less desirable. Younger, presumably less experienced women had a greater tendency to mate copy compared with older women, but high SPMV did not predict greater levels of mate copying. The findings reaffirmed and expanded those suggesting that women do not make mate choices independently.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agrawal, A. F. (2001). The evolutionary consequences of mate copying on male traits. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 51, 33–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berman, G., & Cutler, B. L. (1996). Effects of inconsistencies in eyewitness testimony on mock-juror decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 170–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertrandias, L., & Goldsmith, R. E. (2006). Some psychological motivations for fashion opinion seeking. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 10, 25–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biesanz, J. C., West, S. G., & Millevoi, A. (2007). What do you learn about someone over time? The relationship between length of acquaintance and consensus and self-other agreement in judgments of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 119–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botwin, M. D., Buss, D. M., & Shackleford, K. (1997). Personality and mate preferences: five factors in mate selection and marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality, 65, 107–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, C., Gruendl, M., Marberger, C. & Scherber, C. (2001). Beautycheck: causes and consequences of human facial attractiveness [Summary]. Available online at http://www.uniregensburg.de/Fakultaeten/phil_Fak_II/Psychologie/Psy_II/beautycheck/english/zusammen/zusammen1.htm.

  • Brown, G. R., & Fawcett, T. W. (2005). Sexual selection: copycat mating in birds. Current Biology, 15, 626–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (1992). Mate preference mechanisms: Consequences for partner choice and intrasexual competition. In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 249–266). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., & Barnes, M. (1986). Preferences in human mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(3), 559–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (2008). Attractive women want it all: good genes, economic investment, parenting proclivities, and emotional commitment. Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 134–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buunk, B. P., Dijkstra, P., Fetchenhauer, D., & Kenrick, D. T. (2002). Age and gender differences in mate selection criteria for various involvement levels. Personal Relationships, 9, 271–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. P. (2004). Self-perceived attractiveness and masculinisation predict women’s sociosexuality. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25(2), 113–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, T. H. (1991). The evolution of parental care. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, T. H., Hiraiwahasegawa, M., & Robertson, A. (1989). Mate choice on fallow deer leks. Nature, 340, 463–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Constanz, G. (1985). Alloparental care in the tessellated darter. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 14, 175–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. London: Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Digelidis, N., Papaioannou, A., Laparidis, K., & Christodoulidis, T. (2003). A one-year intervention in 7th grade physical education classes aiming to change motivational climate and attitudes towards exercise. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 4(3), 195–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drullion, D., & Dubois, F. (2008). Mate-choice copying by female zebra finches, Taeniopygia guttata: what happens when model females provide inconsistent information? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 63, 269–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dugatkin, L. A. (1992). Sexual selection and imitation: females copy the mate choice of others. The American Naturalist, 139(6), 1384–1389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dugatkin, L. A., & Godin, J. G. J. (1993). Female mate copying in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata): age-dependent effects. Behavioral Ecology, 4, 289–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eva, K. W., & Wood, T. J. (2006). Are all the taken men good? An indirect examination of mate-choice copying in humans. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 175, 1573–1574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feingold, A. (1992). Gender differences in mate selection preferences: a test of the parental investment model. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 125–139.

  • Fischer, P., Schulz-Hardt, S., & Frey, D. (2008). Selective exposure and information quantity: how different information quantities moderate decision makers’ preference for consistent and inconsistent information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 231–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Funder, D. C., & Colvin, C. R. (1988). Friends and strangers: acquaintanceship, agreement, and the accuracy of personality judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 149–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galef, B. G., & Laland, K. N. (2005). Social learning in animals: empirical studies and theoretical models. Bioscience, 55, 489–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, R. M., & Hoglund, J. (1992). Copying and sexual selection. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 7, 229–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, R. M., Bradbury, J. W., & Vehrencamp, S. L. (1991). Mate choice in lekking sage grouse revisited: The roles of vocal display, female site fidelity, and copying. Behavioral Ecology, 2, 165–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilovich, T., Keltner, D., & Nisbett, R. E. (2006). Social psychology. New York: Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godin, J. G. J., Herdman, E. J. E., & Dugatkin, L. A. (2005). Social influences on female mate choice in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata: generalized and repeatable trait-copying behaviour. Animal Behaviour, 69, 999–1005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godoy, R., Eisenberg, D. T. A., Reyes-Garcia, V., Huanca, T., Leonard, W. R., McDade, T. W., et al. (2008). Assortative mating and offspring well-being: theory and empirical findings from a native Amazonian society in Bolivia. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 201–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grundmann, R. (2009). The role of expertise in governance processes. Forest Policy and Economics, 11, 398–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heine, J., Koch, S., & Goldie, P. (2004). Patients’ experiences of readiness for discharge following a total hip replacement. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy, 50, 227–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, S. E., & Buss, D. M. (2008). The mere presence of opposite-sex others on judgments of sexual and romantic desirability: Opposite effects for men and women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 635–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodkinson, B. P., Swaddle, J. P., Cathey, M. G., & Correll, M. (2005). Socially transmitted mate preferences in a monogamous bird: a non-genetic mechanism of sexual selection. Proceedings of the Royal Society of British Biological Sciences, 272, 1053–1058.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoglund, J., Alatalo, R. V., & Lundberg, A. (1990). Copying the mate choice of others? Observations of female black grouse. Behaviour, 114, 221–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollenbeck, J. R., Ilgen, D. R., Sego, D. J., Hedlund, J., Major, D. A., & Phillips, J. (1995). Multilevel theory of team decision making: decision performance in teams incorporating distributed expertise. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 292–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., Little, A. C., Burriss, R. P., & Feinberg, D. R. (2007). Social transmission of face preferences among humans. Proceedings of the Royal Society of British Biological Sciences, 274, 899–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenrick, D. T., & Keefe, R. C. (1992). Age preferences in mates reflect sex differences in reproductive strategy. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15, 75–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, R. A., & Sargent, R. C. (1989). Egg-mimicry as a mating strategy in the fantail darter, Etheostoma flabellare: females prefer males with eggs. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 25, 321–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lalumiere, M. L., & Quinsey, V. L. (1996). Sexual deviance, antisociality, mating effort, and the use of sexually coercive behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 33–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lalumiere, M. L., Seto, M. C., & Quinsey, V. L. (1995). Self-perceived mating success and the mating choices of human males and females. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Lalumiere, M. L., Chalmers, L. J., Quinsey, V. L., & Seto, M. C. (1996). A test of the mate deprivation hypothesis of sexual coercion. Ethology and Sociobiology, 17, 299–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landolt, M. A., Lalumiere, M. L., & Quinsey, V. L. (1995). Sex differences in intra-sex variations in human mating tactics: an evolutionary approach. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenton, A., Penke, L., Todd, P. M., & Fasolo, B. (1999). The heart does have its reasons: Social rationality in mate choice. In R. Hertwig, U. Hoffrage, & The ABC Research Group (Eds.), Social rationality. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucchetti, A. E. (1999). Deception in disclosing one’s sexual history: safe-sex avoidance or ignorance? Communication Quarterly, 47(3), 300–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnhagen, C. (1991). Predation risk as a cost of reproduction. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 6(6), 183–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marconato, A., & Bisazza, A. (1986). Males whose nests contain eggs are preferred by female Cottus gobio L. (Pisces, Cottidae). Animal Behaviour, 34, 1580–1582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsumoto, D., & Ekman, P. (1988). Japanese and Caucasian facial expressions of emotion (JACFEE) [Slides]. San Francisco: Intercultural and Emotion Research Laboratory, Department of Psychology, San Francisco State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muir, E. H., & Ogden, J. (2001). Consultations involving people with congenital disabilities: factors that help or hinder giving care. Family Practice, 18(4), 419–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Place, S. S., Todd, P. M., Penke, L., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2010). Humans show mate copying after observing real mate choices. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31, 320–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pruett-Jones, S. (1992). Independent versus nonindependent mate choice: do females copy each other? The American Naturalist, 140, 1000–1009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pruett-Jones, S. G., & Pruett-Jones, M. A. (1990). Sexual selection through female choice in Lawes’ parotia, a lek-mating bird of paradise. Evolution, 44, 486–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinlan, R. J., & Quinlan, M. B. (2007). Evolutionary ecology of human pair-bonds. Cross-Cultural Research, 41(2), 149–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Real, L. (1990). Search theory and mate choice. I. Models of single-sex discrimination. American Naturalist, 136(3), 376–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regan, P. C. (1998). What if you can’t get what you want? Willingness to compromise ideal mate selection standards as a function of sex, mate value, and relationship context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1294–1303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridley, M., & Rechten, C. (1981). Female sticklebacks prefer to spawn with mates whose nests contain eggs. Behaviour, 16, 152–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, A. (2008). Drawing on expertise: legal decision-making and the reception of expert evidence. Criminal Law Review, 6, 443–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, D. P., & Buss, D. M. (2001). Human mate poaching: tactics and temptations for infiltrating existing mateships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 894–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulman, G. L., & Hoskins, M. (1986). Perceiving the male versus the female face. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 10(2), 141–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, D. (1993). Adaptive significance of waist-to-hip ratio and female physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 293–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, A., & Townsend, E. (2007). Predicting behaviour towards genetically modified food using implicit and explicit attitudes. British Journal of Social Psychology, 65(2), 293–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Surbey, M. K., & Brice, G. R. (2007). Enhancement of self-perceived mate value precedes a shift in men’s preferred mating strategy. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 39(3), 513–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. E., Saphire-Bernstein, S., & Seeman, T. E. (2010). Are plasma oxytocin in women and plasma vasopressin in men biomarkers of distressed pair-bond relationships? Psychological Science, 21, 3–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thiessen, D., & Gregg, B. (1980). Human assortative mating and genetic equilibrium: an evolutionary perspective. Ethology and Sociobiology, 1, 111–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (1996). The evolution of human sexuality. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 11(2), 98–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871–1971 (pp. 136–179). Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uller, T., & Johansson, L. C. (2003). Human mate choice and the wedding ring effect: are married men more attractive? Human Nature, 14, 267–276.

  • Unger, L. M., & Sargent, R. C. (1988). Allopaternal care in the fathead minnow, Pimephales promelas: females prefer males with eggs. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 23, 27–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valone, T. J. (2007). From eavesdropping on performance to copying the behavior of others: a review of public information use. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 62, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voland, E., & Engel, C. (1990). Female choice in humans: a conditional mate selection strategy of the krummhorn women (Germany, 1720–1874). Ethology, 84(2), 144–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waynforth, D. (2000). Mate choice trade-offs and women’s preference for physically attractive men. Human Nature, 12(3), 207–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waynforth, D. (2007). Mate choice copying in humans. Human Nature, 18, 264–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, D. J., & Galef, B. G. (2000). Differences between the sexes in direction and duration of response to seeing a potential sex partner mate with another. Animal Behaviour, 59, 1235–1240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witte, K., & Ryan, M. J. (2002). Mate choice copying in the sailfin molly, Poecilia latipinnia, in the wild. Animal Behaviour, 63(5), 943–949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank each participant, without whom this work would not have been possible. This study was undertaken by the first author in partial fulfillment of the requirements of a B. Psych Honours degree. We thank the reviewers for their thoughtful suggestions on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryan C. Anderson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Anderson, R.C., Surbey, M.K. I Want What She’s Having. Hum Nat 25, 342–358 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-014-9202-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-014-9202-7

Keywords

Navigation