Abstract
Significant claims about science education form an integral part of Thomas Kuhn's philosophy. Since the late 1950s, when Kuhn started wrestling with the ideas of ‘normal research’ and ‘convergent thought’, the nature of science education has played an important role in his argument. Hence, the nature of science education is an essential aspect of the phase-model of scientific development developed in his famous The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, just as his later work on categories and conceptual structures takes its starting point in the transmission rather than the creation of concepts and categories.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Anderson, H. (MS): ‘Kuhn's account of family resemblance: A solution to the problem of wide-open texture’, manuscript submitted for publication.
Andersen, H. & Nersessian, N. (MS): ‘Nomic concepts, frames, and conceptual change’, paper delivered at PSA 1998. The Biennial Conference of the Philosophy of Science Association 1998, Kansas City, October 1998.
Barsalou, L.: 1992, Cognitive Psychology: An Overview for Cognitive Scientists, Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum.
Bellaimey, J. E.: 1990, ‘Family Resemblance and the Problem of the Under-Determination of Extension’, Philosophical Investigations 13, 31-43.
Brown, R.: 1958, ‘How Shall A Thing Be Called?’, Psychological Review 65, 14-21.
Brown, R.: 1965, Social Psychology, Free Press, New York.
Chi, M., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R.: 1981, ‘Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices’, Cognitive Science 5: 121-152.
Conklin, H. C.: 1969, ‘Lexicographical Treatment of Folk Taxonomies’, in S. A. Tyler (ed), Cognitive Anthropology, Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York, pp. 41-59.
Giere, R.: 1994, ‘The Cognitive Structure of Scientific Theories’, Philosophy of Science 61: 276-296.
Hoyningen-Huene, P.: 1993, Reconstructing Scientific Revolutions: Thomas S. Kuhn's Philosophy of Science, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Keil, F. C.: 1989, Concepts, Kinds, and Cognitive Development, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Kuhn, T. S.: 1959, ‘The Essential Tension: Tradition and Innovation in Scientific Research’, in C. W. Taylor (ed), The Third (1959) University of Utah Conference on the Identification of Scientific Talent, pp. 162-174. Reprinted in T. S. Kuhn: The Essential Tension, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1977, pp. 225–239.
Kuhn, T. S.: 1963, ‘The Function of Dogma in Scientific Research’, in A. Crombie (ed), Scientific Change, Heinemann, London, pp. 347-369.
Kuhn, T. S.: 1970a, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1962, 2nd ed. 1970.
Kuhn, T. S.: 1970b, ‘Logic of Discovery or Psychology of Research’, in I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (eds), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 1-23.
Kuhn, T. S.: 1974, ‘Second Thoughts on Paradigms’, in F. Suppe (ed): The Structure of Scientific Theories, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, pp. 459-482. Reprinted in T. S. Kuhn: The Essential Tension, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 293–319.
Kuhn, T. S.: 1976, ‘Theory-change as Structure-change: Comments on the Sneed Formalism’, Erkenntnis 10: 179-199.
Kuhn, T. S.: 1979, ‘Metaphor in Science’, in A. Ortony (ed), Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 409-419.
Kuhn, T. S.: 1983, ‘Commensurability, Comparability, Communicability’, PSA 1982, Vol. 2, pp. 669-688.
Kuhn, T. S.: 1989, ‘Possible Worlds in History of Science’, in S. Allén (ed), Possible Worlds in Humanities, Arts and Sciences, De Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 9-32.
Kuhn, T. S.: 1990a, ‘An Historian's Theory of Meaning’, Talk to the Cognitive Science Colloquium, UCLA 4/26/90.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Andersen, H. Learning by Ostension: Thomas Kuhn on Science Education. Science & Education 9, 91–106 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008731210789
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008731210789