Skip to main content
Log in

On the relationship of hope and gratitude to corporate social responsibility

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A longitudinal study of 308 white-collar U.S. employees revealed that feelings of hope and gratitude increase concern for corporate social responsibility (CSR). In particular, employees with stronger hope and gratitude were found to have a greater sense of responsibility toward employee and societal issues; interestingly, employee hope and gratitude did not affect sense of responsibility toward economic and safety/quality issues. These findings offer an extension of research by Giacalone, Paul, and Jurkiewicz (2005, Journal of Business Ethics, 58, 295-305).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boal K. B., Peery N. (1985). The Cognitive Structure of Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Management 2:75–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron K. S., Dutton J. E., Quinn R. E. (2003). Positive Organizational Scholarship. Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang E. C. (1998). Hope, Problem-solving Ability, and Coping in a College Student Population: Some Implications for Theory and Practice. Journal of Clinical Psychology 54(7):953–962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson Centre for Business Ethics. (1999). Principles of Stakeholder Management. Clarkson Centre for Business Ethics, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, T. D. and D. T. Campbell: 1979, Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings (Rand McNally, Chicago)

  • Emmons R. A. (2003). Acts of Gratitude in Organizations. In: Cameron K. S., Dutton J. E., Quinn R. E. (eds). Positive Organizational Scholarship: Foundations of a New Discipline. Berrett-Koelher, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmons R. A., McCullough M. E. (2003). Counting Blessings Versus Burdens: An Experimental Investigation of Gratitude and Subjective Well-being in Daily Life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 84:377–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endler N. S. (1973). The Person versus the Situation – A Pseudo Issue? A Response to Alker. Journal of Personality 41:287–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman R. E. (1994). The Politics of Stakeholder Theory: Some Future Directions. Business Ethics Quarterly 4:409–421

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M.: 1983, ‘The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase it Profits’, in T. Donaldson and P. Werhane (eds.), Ethical Issues in Business: A Philosophical Approach, 2nd edition (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) (Reprinted from New York Times Magazine, 13 September 1970]

  • Giacalone R. A., Paul K., Jurkiewicz C. L. (2005). A Preliminary Investigation into the Role of Positive Psychology in Consumer Sensitivity to Corporate Social Performance. Journal of Business Ethics 58:295–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemingway C. A., Maclagan P. W. (2004). Managers’ Personal Values as Drivers of Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 50:33–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart R. (1997). Polarized Priorities of Flexible Alternatives: A Comment. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 6:289–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurtz, L.: 1997, ‘No Effect, or No Net Effect? Studies on Socially Responsible Investing’, The Journal of Investing, 37, 37

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, S. J. and C. R. Snyder, (Eds.): 2003, Positive Psychological Assessment: A Handbook of Models and Measures (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC)

  • Marcoux A. M. (2003). A Fiduciary Argument against Stakeholder Theory. Business Ethics Quarterly 13:1–24

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdams D. P., Hart H., Maruna S. (1998). The anatomy of generativity. In: McAdams D. P., Aubin E. de St. (eds). Generativity and Adult Development: How and Why We Care for the Next Generation. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • McCullough M. E., Emmons R. A., Tsang J. (2002). The Grateful Disposition: A Conceptual and Empirical Topography. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82:112–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCullough M. E., Kirkpatrick S., Emmons R. A., Larson D. (2001). Is Gratitude a Moral Affect?. Psychological Bulletin 127:249–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff P. M., Organ D. W. (1986). Self Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects. Journal of Management 12:531–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz R. H., Post F. R. (2002). The Unexplored Potential of Hope to Level the Playing Field: A Multilevel Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics 37:135–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. P.: 1999a, Mission Statement and Conclusions of Akumal 1, Retrieved January 9, 1999, from http://www.psych.upenn.edu/seligman/pospsy.htm

  • Seligman, M. E. P.: 1999b, Positive Psychology: Network Concept Paper. Retrieved September 14, 1999, from http://www.psych.upenn.edu/seligman/pospsy.htm

  • Seligman M. E. P., Csikszentmihalyi M. (2000). Positive Psychology: An Introduction. American Psychologist 55:5–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singhapakdi A., Vitell S. J., Rallapalli K. C., Kraft K. L. (1996). The Perceived Pole of Ethics and Social Responsibility: A Scale Development. Journal of Business Ethics 15:1131–1140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder C. R. (2000) A New Model of Hope. In: Snyder CR (eds). Handbook of Hope: Theory, Measurement, and Iterventions. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder C. R., Harris C., Anderson J. R., Holleran S. A., Irving L. M., Sigmon S. T., Yoshinobu L., Gibb J., Langelle C. (1991) The Will and the Ways: Development and Validation of an Individual Differences Measure of Hope. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 60:570–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder C. R., Irving L. M., Anderson J. R. (1991) Hope and Health: Measuring the Will and the Ways. In: Snyder CR, Forsyth DR (eds). The Handbook of Social and Clinical Psychology: The Health Perspective. Pergamon Press, Elmsford, NY, pp. 285–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder C. R., Lopez S. J. (eds) (2002) Handbook of Positive Psychology. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, C. R. and S. J. Lopez, (Eds.): 2004, Handbook of Positive Psychology (Oxford University Press, New York)

  • Snyder C. R., Sympson S. C., Ybasco F. C., Borders T. F., Babyak M. A., Higgins R. L. (1996) Development and Validation of the State Hope Scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2:321–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lynne M. Andersson.

Additional information

Lynne M. Andersson, Ph.D. is Associate Professor of Human Resource Management at the Fox School of Business and Management, Temple University, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Her teaching and scholarship focus on the dark side of business organizations; in particular, she’s been examining some social maladies that are arguably associated with late capitalism (cynicism and incivility) as well as the role of social activism in countering capitalist barriers to sustainability.

Robert A. Giacalone, Ph.D. is Professor of Human Resource Management at the Fox School of Business and Management, Temple University, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. His research interests focus on the impact of workplace spirituality and changing values on business ethics. He is currently Co-editor of the Ethics in Practice book series.

Carole L. Jurkiewicz, Ph.D. is the John W. Dupuy Endowed Professor and Women’s Hospital Distinguished Professor of Healthcare Management at Louisiana State University. She has published numerous research articles, books, and news articles on the topics of organizational ethics, leadership, and behavior.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Andersson, L.M., Giacalone, R.A. & Jurkiewicz, C.L. On the relationship of hope and gratitude to corporate social responsibility. J Bus Ethics 70, 401–409 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9118-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9118-1

Keywords

Navigation