Skip to main content
Log in

Quantitative Anatomy: Power Beyond the Images

  • Published:
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Positron emission tomography (PET) is a frontiermedical technology that, in contrast to the othercomputer-assisted technologies providing anatomicalpictures, produces functional images. I argue that PETalso opens up an avenue for shifting from images (asa tool for representation of biomedical data) back toanalysis of measurements (as a tool for quantificationof physiology). Admittedly, quantification of functionrequires structural constraints. I coined the emerginginterpretational framework quantitative anatomyin an attempt to conceptualize the PET merger betweenmeasuring and imaging, the two competing meansmedicine uses to examine the human body. Anatomyjustifies interpretations that fit the existingknowledge of a larger clinical audience, whilestatistical data possess an unexplored potential tointroduce mathematical rigor in the evaluation offunction, but are still a black box for the majorityof clinicians. This epistemological change is beingcarried out by PET users in action as well as indiscourse.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Marks HM. Medical technologies: social contexts and consequences. In: Bynum WF, Porter R. eds. Companion Encyclopedia of the History of Medicine, London: Routledge, 1993: 1592–1618.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Reiser SJ. The science of diagnosis: diagnostic technology. In: Bynum WF, Porter R. eds Companion Encyclopedia of the History of Medicine. London: Routledge, 1993: 826–851.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pasveer B. Knowledge of shadows: the introduction of x-ray images in medicine. Soc Health Ill 1989; 11: 360–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pasveer B. Depiction in medicine as a two-way affair: x-ray pictures and pulmonary tuberculosis in the early twentieth century. In: Löwy I. ed. Medicine and Change: Historical and Sociological Studies of Medical Innovation. Montrouge and London: Les Editions INSERM/John Libby Eurotext, 1993: 85–105.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Howell JD. 'soldier's heart:' the redefinition of heart disease and specialty formation in early twentieth-century Great Britain. In: Bynum WF, Lawrence C, Nutton V. eds. The Emergence of Modern Cardiology (Med. Hist. Suppl. 5). London: Welcome Institute for the History of Medicine, 1985: 34–52.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Howell JD. Cardiac physiology and clinical medicine? Two case studies. In: Physiology in the American Context, 1850–1914. Bethesda, MD: The American Physiological Society, 1987: 279–292.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Canguilhem G. Le statut épistemologique de la médecine. Hist Phil Life Sci 1988; 10(Suppl.): 15–29.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Burrows EM. Pioneers and Early Years: A History of British Radiology. London: Colophon, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brecher R, Brecher E. The Rays: A History of Radiology in the United States and Canada. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Reiser SJ. Medicine and the Reign of Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Feindel W, Yamamoto L. Physiological tomography by positrons: introduction and historical note. J Comp Ass Tomography 1978; 2: 637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Blume SS. Insight and Industry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Raichle ME. Visualizing the mind. Sci Amer 1994 (April): 58–64.

  14. Phelps ME. The evolution of Positron Emission Tomography. In: Corsi P. ed. the Enchanted Loom. London: Oxford University Press, 1991: 347–357.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Barley SR. The social construction of a machine: ritual, superstition, magical thinking and other pragmatic responses to running a CT scanner. In: Lock M, Gordon DR. eds. Biomedicine Examined. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1988: 497–539.

  16. Barley SR. Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observation of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Admin Sci Quart 1986; 31: 78–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Evans AC, Marrett S, Torrescorzo J, Ku S, Collins L. MRI-PET correlation in Three Dimensions Using a Volume-of-Interest (VOI) Atlas. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1991; 11: A69–A78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shapin S. The politics of observation: cerebral anatomy and social interests in the Edinburgh phrenology disputes. In: Wallis R. ed. On the margins of Science. The Social Construction of Rejected Knowledge. Keele: Sociological Review Monograph, 1979; 27: 139–178.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Posner M. Seeing the mind. Science 1993; 262: 673–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Crease RP. Biomedicine in the age of imaging. Science 1993; 261: 554–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Latour B. Drawing things together. In: Lynch M, Woolgar S. ed. Representation in Scientific Practice, 1990: 19–68.

  22. Lerner BH. The perils of “x-ray vision:” how radiographic images have historically influenced perception. Persp Biol Med 1992; 35: 383–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anguelov, Z. Quantitative Anatomy: Power Beyond the Images. Theor Med Bioeth 20, 501–516 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009924528151

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009924528151

Navigation