Skip to main content
Log in

A remark on the tree property in a choiceless context

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archive for Mathematical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We show that the consistency of the theory “ZF + DC + Every successor cardinal is regular + Every limit cardinal is singular + Every successor cardinal satisfies the tree property” follows from the consistency of a proper class of supercompact cardinals. This extends earlier results due to the author showing that the consistency of the theory “\({{\rm ZF} + \neg{\rm AC}_\omega}\) + Every successor cardinal is regular + Every limit cardinal is singular + Every successor cardinal satisfies the tree property” follows from hypotheses stronger in consistency strength than a supercompact limit of supercompact cardinals. A lower bound in consistency strength is provided by a result of Busche and Schindler, who showed that the consistency of the theory “ZF + Every successor cardinal is regular + Every limit cardinal is singular + Every successor cardinal satisfies the tree property” implies the consistency of ADL(R).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abraham U.: Aronszajn trees on \({\aleph_2}\) and \({\aleph_3}\). Ann. Pure Appl. Log. 24, 213–230 (1983)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Apter A.: Some new upper bounds in consistency strength for certain choiceless large cardinal patterns. Arch. Math. Log. 31, 201–205 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Apter A.: Some results on consecutive large cardinals. Ann. Pure Appl. Log. 25, 1–17 (1983)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Apter A.: Some results on consecutive large cardinals II: Applications of Radin forcing. Israel J. Math. 52, 273–292 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Busche D., Schindler R.: The strength of choiceless patterns of singular and weakly compact cardinals. Ann. Pure Appl. Log. 159, 198–248 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Cummings J., Foreman M.: The tree property. Adv. Math 133, 1–32 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Foreman M., Magidor M., Schindler R.: The consistency strength of successive cardinals with the tree property. J. Symb. Log. 66, 1837–1847 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Hamkins J.D.: Gap forcing. Israel J. Math 125, 237–252 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Hamkins J.D.: Gap forcing: Generalizing the Lévy-Solovay theorem. Bull. Symb. Log. 5, 264–272 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Jech T.: Set Theory: The Third Millennium Edition, Revised and Expanded. Springer, Berlin (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Laver R.: Making the supercompactness of κ indestructible under κ-directed closed forcing. Israel J. Math. 29, 385–388 (1978)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Lévy A., Solovay R.: Measurable cardinals and the Continuum Hypothesis. Israel J. Math 5, 234–248 (1967)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Magidor M., Shelah S.: The tree property at successors of singular cardinals. Arch. Math. Log. 35, 385–404 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Mitchell W.: Aronszajn trees and the independence of the transfer property. Ann. Math. Log. 5, 21–46 (1972/73)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Schindler R.: Weak covering and the tree property. Arch. Math. Log. 38, 515–520 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Silver J.: Some applications of model theory in set theory. Ann. Math. Log. 3, 45–110 (1971)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Sinapova, D.: The tree property at \({\aleph_{\omega + 1}}\). J. Symb. Log. (Submitted)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arthur W. Apter.

Additional information

Arthur W. Apter’s research was partially supported by PSC-CUNY grants. He wishes to thank Ralf Schindler for helpful correspondence on the subject matter of this paper which considerably improved and clarified its presentation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Apter, A.W. A remark on the tree property in a choiceless context. Arch. Math. Logic 50, 585–590 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00153-011-0233-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00153-011-0233-z

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification (2010)

Navigation