Abstract
Some theorists who accept the existence of global justice duties to alleviate the condition of distant needy strangers hold that these duties are significantly constrained by special ties to fellow countrymen. The “patriotic priority thesis” holds that morality requires the members of each nation-state to give priority to helping needy fellow compatriots over more needy distant strangers. Three arguments for constraint and patriotic priority are examined in this essay: an argument from fair play, one from coercion, another from coercion and autonomy. Under scrutiny, none of these arguments qualifies as successful.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Arneson, R.J. Do Patriotic Ties Limit Global Justice Duties?. J Ethics 9, 127–150 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-004-3323-x
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-004-3323-x