Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Do Patriotic Ties Limit Global Justice Duties?

  • Published:
The Journal of Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Some theorists who accept the existence of global justice duties to alleviate the condition of distant needy strangers hold that these duties are significantly constrained by special ties to fellow countrymen. The “patriotic priority thesis” holds that morality requires the members of each nation-state to give priority to helping needy fellow compatriots over more needy distant strangers. Three arguments for constraint and patriotic priority are examined in this essay: an argument from fair play, one from coercion, another from coercion and autonomy. Under scrutiny, none of these arguments qualifies as successful.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard J. Arneson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arneson, R.J. Do Patriotic Ties Limit Global Justice Duties?. J Ethics 9, 127–150 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-004-3323-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-004-3323-x

Keywords

Navigation