Skip to main content
Log in

Egalitarianism and Responsibility

  • Published:
The Journal of Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This essay examines several possible rationales for the egalitarian judgment that justice requires better-off individuals to help those who are worse off even in the absence of social interaction. These rationales include equality (everyone should enjoy the same level of benefits), moral meritocracy (each should get benefits according to her responsibility or deservingness), the threshold of sufficiency (each should be assured a minimally decent quality of life), prioritarianism (a function of benefits to individuals should be maximized that gives priority to the worse off), and mixed views. A case is made for adopting either prioritarianism or a mixed view that gives priority both to the worse off and to the more responsible and deserving.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arneson, R.J. Egalitarianism and Responsibility. The Journal of Ethics 3, 225–247 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009874016786

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009874016786

Navigation