Skip to main content
Log in

On Semantics and Saṃketa: Thoughts on a Neglected Problem with Buddhist Apoha Doctrine

  • Published:
Journal of Indian Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

“...a theory of meaning for a particular language should be conceived by a philosopher as describing the practice of linguistic interchange by speakers of the language without taking it as already understood what it is to have a language at all: that is what, by imagining such a theory, we are trying to make explict." – Michael Dummer (2004: 31)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abhyankar, K.V., ed. (1976). Mīmāmsādarśanam, Vol. I: Śrīmajjaiminipranīte Mīmāmsādarśane Prathamādhyāyasya Tarkapādanāma Prathamapāda. (Jaimini’s sūtras with Śābarabhās:yam, commentary Prabhā by Śrī Vaidyanāthaśāstri.) Trivandrum: Ānandāśrama Sanskrit Series, Vol. 97. (Reprint; .rst ed., 1930–1934.)

  • Arnold D. (2005). Buddhists, Brahmins, and Belief: Epistemology in South Asian Philosophy of Religion. New York, Columbia University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker L.R. (1987). Saving Belief: A Critique of Physicalism. Princeton, Princeton University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandom, R. (1997). ’Study Guide [to Wilfrid Sellars’s "Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind"]’. In Wilfrid Sellars, Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind: With An Introduction by Richard Rorty and a Study Guide by Robert Brandom, (pp. 119–181). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  • Brandom R. (2000). Articulating Reasons: An Introduction to Inferentialism. Cambridge, Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardona G. (1967–1968). ‘Anvaya and Vyatireka in Indian Grammar’. The Adyar Library Bulletin 31–32, 313–352.

  • Chisholm, R.M., & Sellars, W. (1957). ‘Intentionality and the Mental: Chisholm- Sellars Correspondence on Intentionality’. In H. Feigl, M. Scriven, & G. Maxwell (eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Vol. 2 (pp. 521–539). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

  • Descombes V. (2001). The Mind’s Provisions: A Critique of Cognitivism. Trans. Stephen Adam Schwartz. Princeton, Princeton University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus G. (1997). Recognizing Reality: Dharmakīrti’s Philosophy and its Tibetan Interpreters. Albany, SUNY

    Google Scholar 

  • Dummet M. (2004). Truth and the Past. New York, Columbia University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne J.D. (2004). Foundations of Dharmakīrti’s Philosophy. Boston, Wisdom Publications

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor J. (1975). The Language of Thought. Cambridge, Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. (1982). ‘Methodological Solipsism Considered as a Research Strategy in Cognitive Psychology’. In H.L. Dreyfus (ed.), Husserl, Intentionality, and Cognitive Science (pp. 277–303). Cambridge: MIT.

  • Fodor J. (1985). ‘Fodor’s Guide to Mental Representation: The Intelligent Auntie’s Vade-Mecum’. Mind, New Series 94(373): 76–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor J. (1990). A Theory of Content and Other Essays. Cambridge, MIT

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor J. (1994). The Elmand the Expert:Mentalese and its Semantics.Cambridge, MIT

    Google Scholar 

  • Frauwallner E. (1968). Materialien zur ältesten Erkenntnislehre der Karmamīmāmsā. Wien, Hermann B öhlaus Nachf

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganeri J. (1999). Semantic Powers: Meaning and the Means of Knowing in Classical Indian Philosophy. Oxford, Clarendon Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganeri J. (2001). Philosophy in Classical India: The Proper Work of Reason. London, Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfeld J. (1988). Belief in Psychology: A Study in the Ontology of Mind. Cambridge, MIT

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. (1973a). ‘The Impact of the Concept of Culture on the Concept of Man’. In The Interpretation of Cultures (pp. 33–54). New York: Basic Books.

  • Geertz, C. (1973b). ‘The Growth of Culture and the Evolution of Mind’. In The Interpretation of Cultures (pp. 55–83). New York: Basic Books.

  • Gnoli, R., ed. (1960). The Pramānavārttikam of Dharmakīrti: The First Chapter with the Autocommentary: Text and Critical Notes. Serie Orientale Roma, XXIII. Rome: Istituto Italiano per il Medio ed Estremo Oriente.

  • Goswami M., ed (1972). Nyāyakusumāñjali of Udayanācārya, with the Commentaries Āmoda of Śankara Miśra, Viveka of Gunānanda[,] Bodhanī of Varadarāja, Parimala of Mm Shri Harihar Kr: pālu Dvivedī. Darbhanga, Mithila Institute

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattori, M. (1979). ‘Apoha and Pratibhā’. In N. Nagatomi, et al. (eds.), Sanskrit and Indian Studies: Essays in Honour of Daniel H. H. Ingalls (pp. 61–73).Dordrecht: Reidel.

  • Hattori, M. (1982). ‘Pramānasamuccaya Chapter 5: Anyāpohaparīksā, with Jinendrabuddhi’s Commentary, edited Tibetan with Sanskrit fragments’. Memoirs of the Faculty of Letters, Kyoto University 21, 103–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattori, M. (2000). ‘Dignāga’s Theory of Meaning: An Annotated Translation of the Pramānasamuccayavrtti, Chapter V: Anyāpohaparīksā’. In J. Silk (ed.), Wisdom, Compassion, and the Search for Understanding: The Buddhist Studies Legacy of Gadjin M. Nagao (pp. 137–146). Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.

  • Hayes R.P. (1988). Dignāga on the Interpretation of Signs Studies in Classical India Vol 9. Dordrecht, Kluwer

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. (1970). Logical Investigations. Trans. J. N. Findlay. Two volumes, continuous pagination. Amherst, NY: Humanity Books. Translated from editions of 1900, 1913.

  • Jha, G. trans. (1973–1974). Śābara-bhāsya. Baroda: Gaekwad’s Oriental Series (vols. 66, 70, 73). Second edition.

  • Kant I. (1788). Critique of Practical Reason. Translated and edited by Mary Gregor. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1997.

  • Katsura S. (1979). ‘The Apoha Theory of Dignāga’. Indogaku Bukkyogaku Kenkyu 28(1): 16–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Katsura S. (1991). ‘Dignāga and Dharmakīrti on apoha’. In E. Steinkellner (ed.), Studies in the Buddhist Epistemological Tradition: Proceedings of the Second International Dharmakīrti Conference, Vienna, June 11–16, 1989 (pp. 129–146). Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Philosophisch-HistorischeKlasse Denkschriften, 222. Band. Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.

  • Locke, J. (1689). An Essay concerning Human Understanding. Edited with a foreword by Peter H. Nidditch. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975.

  • Malvania, P.D, ed. (1971). Pandita Durveka Miśra’s Dharmottarapradīpa. Patna: Kashiprasad Jayaswal Research Institute; 2nd ed. (Tibetan Sanskrit Works Series, Vol. 11.)

  • Mohanty J.N. (1974). ‘Husserl and Frege: A New Look at their Relationship’. Research in Phenomenology 4, 51–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nance, R.F. (2004). Models of Teaching and the Teaching of Models: Contextualizing Indian Buddhist Commentary. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago.

  • Pandeya, R.C., ed. (1989). The Pramānavā of Ācārya Dharmakīrti with the Commentaries Svopajñavr of the Author and Pramānavārttikavrtti of Manorathandin. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

  • Patil, P. (2003). ‘On What it is that Buddhists Think About: Apoha in the Ratnakīrti-Nibandhāvali’. Journal of Indian Philosophy 31, 229–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pessin A., Goldberg S. (eds) (1996). The Twin Earth Chronicles: Twenty Years of Reflection on Hilary Putnam’s "The Meaning of ’Meaning’." M.E. Sharpe, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Sāmkrtyāyana, R., ed. (1938–1940). ‘Dharmakīrti’s Pramānavārttika with a Commentary by Manorathanandin’. Journal of the Bihar and Orissa Research Society 24, 3–26/3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sāmkrtyāyana R. (ed) (1943). Karnakagomin’s Commentary on the Pramānavārtti-kavrtti of Dharmakīrti. Kyoto, Rinsen, 1982 (reprint).

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle J. (1982). ‘What Is an Intentional State?’. In: Dreyfus H.L. (eds) Husserl, Intentionality, and Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MIT Press, pp. 259-276

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellars W. (1963). Science, Perception and Reality. Ridgeview, Atascadero, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Shastri S.D. (ed) (1978). Ślokavārttika of ŚrīKumārila Bhatta, with the Commentary Nyāyaratnākara of Śrī Pārthasārathi Miśra. Tara Publications, Varanasi

    Google Scholar 

  • Shastri S.D. (ed) (1992). Apohavāda. Bauddha Bharati, Varanasi

    Google Scholar 

  • Shastri S.D. (ed) (1997). Tattvasaṅgraha of Ācārya Shāntaraksita with the Commentary ‘Pañjikā’ of Shri Kamalashīla. Two volumes, continuous pagination. Bauddha Bharati, Varanasi

    Google Scholar 

  • Siderits M. (1991). Indian Philosophy of Language: Studies in Selected Issues. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Siderits M. (2003). Personal Identity and Buddhist Philosophy: Empty Persons. Ashgate, Burlington, VT

    Google Scholar 

  • Tillemans, T.J.F. (1999). ‘On the So-called Di.cult Point of the Apoha Theory’. In Scripture, Logic, Language: Essays on Dharmakīrti and his Tibetan Successors (pp. 209–246). Boston: Wisdom Publications.

  • Tillemans, T.J.F. (2000). Dharmakīrti’s Pramānavārttika: An Annotated Translation of the Fourth Chapter (parārthānumāna), volume 1 (k.1–148). Philosophisch-Historische Klasse Sitzungsberichte. Vol. 675. Band. Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften

  • Wittgenstein L. (1958). Philosophical Investigations. Trans. G. E. M. Anscombe. Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dan Arnold.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arnold, D. On Semantics and Saṃketa: Thoughts on a Neglected Problem with Buddhist Apoha Doctrine. J Indian Philos 34, 415–478 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-006-9001-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-006-9001-5

Keywords

Navigation