Abstract
There is a two-fold problem the phenomenologist must face: the first has to do with thinking like a phenomenologist given that one is always already steeped in the mundane sphere; the second has to do with the phenomenologist entering into dialogue with those scientists, psychologists, sociologists and other laypersons who still remain in the mundane sphere. I address the first problem by giving an Husserlian-inspired account of the movement from the mundane to the transcendental, and show that there are decent prospects for getting life-world folks to start thinking like phenomenologists. I address the second problem by showing that Husserl has himself caught in a dilemma: either the reduction takes place and no communication is possible between phenomenologist and non-phenomenologist, or the reduction does not take place and the phenomenological method remains a psychological makeshift, supposedly accessible to Husserl and his esoteric followers.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barnes, J. (1987). Early Greek Philosophy. London: Penguin Books.
Buckley, R.P. (1992). Husserl, Heidegger and the Crisis of Philosophical Responsibility. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Cairns, D. (1976). In R.M. Zaner (Ed.), Conversations with Husserl and Fink. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Carr, D. (1977). Kant, Husserl, and the nonempirical ego. The Journal of Philosophy 74 (11): 682–690.
Carr, D. (1999). The Paradox of Subjectivity: The Self in the Transcendental Tradition. New York: Oxford University Press.
Crowell, S.G. (2001). Husserl, Heidegger, and the Space of Meaning: Paths Toward Transcen-dental Phenomenology. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Farber, M. (1962). The Foundation of Phenomenology: Edmund Husserl and the Quest for a Rigorous Science of Philosophy. New York: Paine-Whitman Publishers.
Fink, E. (1970). The Phenomenological Philosophy of Edmund Husserl and Contemporary Criticism. In R.O. Elveton (Ed. and Trans.), The Phenomenology of Husserl: Selected Critical Readings. Chicago: Quadrangle Press, pp. 90–147.
Fink, E. (1972). What Does the Phenomenology of Edmund Husserl Want to Accomplish? (The Phenomenological Idea of Laying-a-Ground). In A. Grugan (Trans.), Research in Phenomenology, Vol. II, New York: Humanities Press, pp. 13–39.
Fink, E. (1995). In R. Bruzina (Ed. and trans.), Sixth Cartesian Meditation: The Idea of a Transcendental Theory of Method. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Frege, G. (1905). Review of E. Husserl's philosophy of arithmetic. Mind 81(14): 324–325.
Frege, G. (1960). The Foundations of Arithmetic. In J.L. Austin (Trans.). New York: Harper.
Hagan, S. and Hirafuji, M. (2001). Constraints on an emergent formulation of conscious. Mental states. Journal of Consciousness Studies 8(9/10): 99–122.
Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and Time. In J. Macquarrie and E. Robinson (Trans.). New York: Harper & Row.
Heidegger, M. (1966). Discourse on Thinking. J.M. Anderson and H.E. Freund (Trans.). New York: Harper & Row.
Heidegger, M. (1971). Plato's Doctrine of Truth, J. Barlow. In W. Barrett and H.D. Aiken (Eds. and Trans.), Philosophy in the Twentieth Century, Vol. III: Contemporary European Thought, pp. 67–91. New York: Harper and Row.
Hopkins, B.C. (1991). On the paradoxical inception and motivation of transcendental philosophy in Plato and Husserl. Man and World 24: 27–47.
Husserl, E. (1970). The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy. In D. Carr (Trans.). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Husserl, E. (1995). Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology. In D. Cairns (Trans.). London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Irwin, T. (1989). Classical Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kant, I. (1929). The Critique of Pure Reason. In N. Kemp-Smith (Trans.). NewYork: Macmillan.
Keller, P. (1999). Husserl and Heidegger on Human Experience. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
King, J. (1982). Ontology and subjectivity in Husserl and Schutz. International Studies in Philosophy 14: 33–56.
Kockelmans, J.J. (1994). Edmund Husserl's Phenomenology. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press.
Kreis, F. (1930). Phänomenologie und Kritizismus. In (Ed.), Heidelberger Abhandlungen zur Philosophie und ihrer Geschichte, pp. 119–145. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr.
MacDonald, P.S. (2000). Descartes and Husserl: The Philosophical Project of Radical Beginnings. Albany: SUNY Press.
Mayr, E. (1996). The autonomy of biology: The position of biology among the sciences. Quarterly Review of Biology 71: 98–106.
McGaughey, D.R. (1976). Husserl and Heidegger on Plato's cave allegory: A study of philosophical influence. International Philosophical Quarterly 16(3): 335–349.
Mohanty, J.N. (1996). Kant and Husserl. Husserl Studies 13(1): 19–30.
Moran, D. (2000). Introduction to Phenomenology. London: Routledge.
Mouillie, J. (1997). Le Fait De Vivre Dans la Phenomenology: Elements Critiques a Partir de Husserl. In A. Tymieniecka (Ed.), Life: Phenomenology of Life as the Starting Point of Philosophy. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 89–100.
Natanson, M. (1973a). Introduction. In M. Natason (Ed.), Phenomenology and the Social Sciences: Vol. 1. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Natanson, M. (1973b). Edmund Husserl: Philosopher of Infinite Tasks. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Nietzsche, F. (1980). On the Advantage and Disadvantage of History for Life. In P. Preuss (Trans.) Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
Overgaard, S. (2002). Epoche and solipsistic reduction. Husserl Studies 18(3): 209–222.
Robinson, H. (2000). Kant on Apriority, Syntheticity, and Judgments. In O.K. Wiegand et al. (Eds.), Phenomenology on Kant, German Idealism, Hermeneutics and Logic: Philosophical Essays in Honor of Thomas M. Seebohm. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 225–248.
Rollinger, R.D. (1999). Husserl's Position in the School of Brentano. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Scheler, M. (1960). On The Eternal in Man. In B. Noble (Trans.). New York: Harper & Row.
Scheler, M. (1970). The Nature of Sympathy. In P.Heath (Trans.). Hamden: Archon Books.
Schutz, A. (1962a). The Paradox of the Transcendental Ego. In H. Wagner and G. Psathas (Eds.), Collected Papers IV. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Schutz, A. (1962b). Symbol, Reality and Society. In M. Natanson (Ed.), Collected Papers I: The Problem of Social Reality. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Silberstein, M. (2001). Converging on emergence: Consciousness, causation and explanation. Journal of Consciousness Studies 8(9/10): 61–98.
Solomon, R. and Higgins K. (1993). The Age of German Idealism. London: Routledge.
Stewart, D. and Mickunas, A. (1974). Exploring Phenomenology: A Guide to the Field and Its Literature. Chicago: American Library Association.
Ströker, E. (1987). The Husserlian Foundations of Science. Washington, DC: Center for Advanced Research in Phenomenology & University Press of America.
Wagner, H. and Psathas, G. (1962). Notes. In H. Wagner and G. Psathas (Eds.), Alfred Schutz: Collected Papers, Volume IV. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Welton, D. (1999). Introduction: The Development of Husserl's Phenomenology. In D. Welton (Ed.), The Essential Husserl: Basic Writings in Transcendental Phenomenology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 3–279.
Zaner, R.M. (1970a). The Way of Phenomenology: Criticism as a Philosophical Discipline. New York: Pegasus Books.
Zaner, R.M. (1970b). The Phenomenology of Epistemic Claims and Its Bearing on the Essence of Philosophy. In M. Natanson (Ed.), Phenomenology and Social Reality: Essays in Memory of Alfred Schutz. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, pp. 17–34.
Zaner, R.M. (1975). On the Sense of Method in Phenomenology. In E. Pivčevic (Ed.), Phenomenology and Philosophical Understanding. London: Cambridge University Press.
Zocher, R. (1932). Husserls Phänomenologie und Scuppes Logik: Ein Beitrag zur Kritik des intuitionistischen Ontologismus in der Immanenzidee. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Arp, R. Husserl and the Penetrability of the Transcendental and Mundane Spheres. Human Studies 27, 221–239 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HUMA.0000042127.53041.57
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HUMA.0000042127.53041.57