Skip to main content
Log in

Machan versus locke: Is “pure” libertarianism possible?

  • Published:
Res Publica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. T. Machan, “Individualism Versus Classical Liberal Political Economy”,Res Publica I:1 (1995), 3–23.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Supra n. 1,. at 10.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Supra n. 1,. at 12.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Charles Taylor has argued, for example, inThe Ethics Of Authenticity (Boston, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1991) that a valid moral idea that does not entail—and is indeed hostile to—moral subjectivism can be recovered from liberal values.

  5. T. Machan, “Does Libertarianism Imply The Welfare State?”,Res Publica III:2 (1997), 131–148.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Supra n. 5,. at 132.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Supra n. 5,. at 132.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Supra n. 5,. at 132.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Supra n. 5,. at 132.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Supra n. 5,. at 131 n. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Supra n. 5,. at 138.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Its definitive statement is C.B. MacPherson,The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Supra n. 12,.passim, and especially 220 and 270.

    Google Scholar 

  14. See especially J. Tully,A Discourse on Property: John Locke and his Adversaries (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980) and J. Dunn,The Political Thought of John Locke (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. Locke,Two Treatises of Government (London: Dent, 1924), 1. 42.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. Locke,Essays on the Law of Nature, trld. Von Leyden, (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1954), 95.

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. Locke,An Essay Concerning Human Understanding (London: Collins, 1964), 4.20.2.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Supra n. 5,. at 134.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Supra n. 17,, at 4.20.6

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. Locke,The Reasonableness of Christianity, cited in MacPherson,Supra n. 12,(. at 224–25.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Supra n. 5,. at 137.

    Google Scholar 

  22. R. Nozick,Anarchy, State and Utopia (New York: Basic Books, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Supra n. 5,, at 137.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Supra n. 5,, at 135.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Supra n. 15,, at 2.46.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Supra n. 5,, at 138.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Supra n. 5,, at 138, my emphasis.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Supra n. 5,, at 132, my emphasis.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Supra n. 1,, at 7.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Supra n. 5,, at 147.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Supra n. 5,, at 147.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arundell, R. Machan versus locke: Is “pure” libertarianism possible?. Res Publica 3, 149–163 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02333602

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02333602

Navigation