References
T. Machan, “Individualism Versus Classical Liberal Political Economy”,Res Publica I:1 (1995), 3–23.
Supra n. 1,. at 10.
Supra n. 1,. at 12.
Charles Taylor has argued, for example, inThe Ethics Of Authenticity (Boston, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1991) that a valid moral idea that does not entail—and is indeed hostile to—moral subjectivism can be recovered from liberal values.
T. Machan, “Does Libertarianism Imply The Welfare State?”,Res Publica III:2 (1997), 131–148.
Supra n. 5,. at 132.
Supra n. 5,. at 132.
Supra n. 5,. at 132.
Supra n. 5,. at 132.
Supra n. 5,. at 131 n. 1.
Supra n. 5,. at 138.
Its definitive statement is C.B. MacPherson,The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1962).
Supra n. 12,.passim, and especially 220 and 270.
See especially J. Tully,A Discourse on Property: John Locke and his Adversaries (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980) and J. Dunn,The Political Thought of John Locke (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969).
J. Locke,Two Treatises of Government (London: Dent, 1924), 1. 42.
J. Locke,Essays on the Law of Nature, trld. Von Leyden, (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1954), 95.
J. Locke,An Essay Concerning Human Understanding (London: Collins, 1964), 4.20.2.
Supra n. 5,. at 134.
Supra n. 17,, at 4.20.6
J. Locke,The Reasonableness of Christianity, cited in MacPherson,Supra n. 12,(. at 224–25.
Supra n. 5,. at 137.
R. Nozick,Anarchy, State and Utopia (New York: Basic Books, 1974).
Supra n. 5,, at 137.
Supra n. 5,, at 135.
Supra n. 15,, at 2.46.
Supra n. 5,, at 138.
Supra n. 5,, at 138, my emphasis.
Supra n. 5,, at 132, my emphasis.
Supra n. 1,, at 7.
Supra n. 5,, at 147.
Supra n. 5,, at 147.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Arundell, R. Machan versus locke: Is “pure” libertarianism possible?. Res Publica 3, 149–163 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02333602
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02333602