Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Common Ground, Corrections, and Coordination

  • Published:
Argumentation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

REFERENCES

  • Allen, James, L. K. Schubert, G. M. Ferguson, P. A. Heeman, C. H. Hwang, T. Kato, M. N. Light, N. G. Martin, B. W. Miller, M. Poesio and D. Traum: 1994, ‘The TRAINS Project: A Case Study in Building a Conversational Planning Agent’, Technical Report 532, Department of Computer Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asher, Nicholas: 1993, Reference to Abstract Objects in Discourse, Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  • Asher, Nicholas: 1995, ‘From Discourse Macro-structure to Micro-structure and Back Again: Discourse Semantics and the Focus/Background Distinction’, in Hans Kamp and Barbara Partee (eds.), Proceedings of the Conference on Semantics in Context, Prague 1995, SFB340 Report, University of Stuttgart.

  • Asher, Nicholas: 1996, ‘The Mathematical Foundations of Discourse Structure’, Proceedings of the Tenth Amsterdam Conference on Formal Semantics

  • Asher, Nicholas: 1998a, ‘Logical Foundations of Discourse Structure and Interpretation’, in J. M. Larrazabal, D. Lascar and G. Mints (eds.), Logic Colloquium 1996, Springer Verlag, 1–45.

  • Asher, Nicholas: 1998b, ‘Varieties of Discourse Structure in Dialogue’, Twendial 98: Proceedings of the Twente Conference on Dialogue.

  • Asher, Nicholas: 1999, ‘Discourse Structure and the Logic of Conversation’, First volume of Current Research in the Semantics Pragmatics Interface.

  • Asher, Nicholas: and Tim Fernando: 1997, ‘Representations with Effective Labelling for Disambiguation’, The Second International Workshop on Computational Semantics, Tilburg, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asher, Nicholas and Alex Lascarides: 1997, ‘Bridging’, Berlin Workshop on Underspecification, also in Journal of Semantics 15, 83–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asher, Nicholas and Alex Lascarides: 1998a, ‘Questions in Dialogue’, Linguistics and Philosophy 21, 237–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asher, Nicholas and Alex Lascarides: 1998b, ‘The Semantics and Pragmatics of Presupposition’, Journal of Semantics 15, 239–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asher, Nicholas and Alex Lascarides: in press, Logics of Conversation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

  • Asher, Nicholas and Michael Morreau: 1991, ‘Commonsense Entailment: A Modal Theory of Nonmonotonic Reasoning’, in J. Mylopoulos and R. Reiter (eds.), Proceedings of the Twelfth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Morgan Kaufman, Los Altos, California, 387–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, Lauri: 1983, Dialogue Games. An Approach to Discourse Analysis, Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  • Clark, Herbert: 1996, Using Language, Cambridge University Press.

  • van Eemeren, Frans H. and Rob Grootendorst: 1984, Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions. A Theoretical Model for the Analysis of Discussions Directed towards Solving Conflicts of Opinion, De Gruyter/Foris, Berlin/Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Eemeren, Frans H. and Rob Grootendorst: 1992, Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies. A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Eemeren, Frans H. and Rob Grootendorst: 2003, A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Eemeren, Frans H. and Rob Grootendorst: 2003, A Pragma-dialectical Procedure for a Critical Discussion, this volume.

  • van Eemeren, Frans H. and Peter Houtlosser: 2002, ‘Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse: A Delicate Balance’, in F. H. van Eemeren and P. Houtlosser (eds.), Dialectic and Rhetoric: The Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 131–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Eemeren, Frans H. and Peter Houtlosser: 2003, Extending pragmadialectics, this volume.

  • Garrod, Simon and Gwyneth Doherty: 1994, ‘Conversation, Co-ordination and Convention: An Empirical Investigation of How Groups Establish Linguistic Conventions’, Cognition 53.

  • Ginzburg, Jonathan: 1994, ‘An Update Semantics for Dialogue’, in H. Bunt, R. Muskens and G. Rentier (eds.), Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Computational Semantics, Institute for Language Technology and Artificial Intelligence, Tilburg University.

  • Ginzburg, Jonathan: 1997, ‘Resolving Questions Parts I and II’, Linguistics and Philosophy.

  • Groenendijk, Jeroen and Martin Stokhof: 1991, ‘Dynamic Predicate Logic’, Linguistics and Philosophy 14.

  • Henkemans, A. Francisca Snoeck: 2003, Complex Argumentation in a Critical Discussion, this volume.

  • Kamp, Hans and Uwe Reyle: 1993, From Discourse to Logic: Introduction to Modeltheoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic and Discourse Representation Theory, Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  • Lascarides, Alex and Nicholas Asher: 1993, ‘Temporal Interpretation, Discourse Relations and Commonsense Entailment’, Linguistics and Philosophy 16, 437–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, David: 1969, Convention, Harvard University Press.

  • van Rees, M. Agnes: 2001, ‘The Diagnostic Power of the Stages of Critical Discussion in the Analysis and Evaluation of Problem-Solving Discussion’, Argumentation 15, 457–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Craige: 1996, Information Structure, Plans and Implicature, AAAI Spring Symposium on Computational Implicature, Stanford CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Craige: 1997, Information Structure and Intonation, manuscript.

  • Sacks, H.: 1992, Lectures on Conversation, vols. I and II, Blackwell Publishers, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Txurruka, I.: 1997, Particion Imformacional en el Discurso, Ph.D. Thesis, University of the Basque Country, San Sebastian, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallduvi, E.: 1994, ‘The Dynamics of Information Packaging’, Dyana 2 Project Report, Centre for Cognitive Science and Human Communication Research Centre, University of Edinburgh.

  • van der Sandt, Rob: 1991, ‘Denial’, Chicago Linguistic Society 27 (2), 331–344.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station, C3500, Austin, TX, 78712, U.S.A

    Nicholas Asher & Anthony Gillies

Authors
  1. Nicholas Asher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anthony Gillies
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Asher, N., Gillies, A. Common Ground, Corrections, and Coordination. Argumentation 17, 481–512 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026346605477

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026346605477

Keywords

Search

Navigation