Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Solidarity, Society and the Welfare State in the United Kingdom

  • Published:
Health Care Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Political argument and institutions in the UnitedKingdom have frequently been represented as the products of ablend of nationalistic conservatism, liberal individualism andsocialism, in which consensus has been prized over ideology. This situation changed, as the standard story has it, with therise of Thatcherism in the late 1970s, and again with the arrivalof Tony Blair's ``New Labour'' pragmatism in the late 1990s. Solidarity as an element of political discourse makes itsappearance in the UK late in the day. It has been most stronglylinked to the Third Way debate, as framed most influentially inthe work of Prof. Anthony Giddens.In this paper we review the history and pre-history of the debateon solidarity in the UK, focussing mostly on its implications forwelfare state reform. In particular we discuss the proposals forthe long-term care of the Elderly issued by the Royal Commissionon long-term care in 1999. In this context we critically examinethe idea that solidarity is a new concept in British politicalculture, and that it is a concept which has real political ``bite''in the project of welfare reform. We examine this through aconsideration of Giddens's attempted synthesis of politicalargument and social theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaron, H. and Schwartz, W.B. (1984) The Painful Prescription. Washington: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrams, F. (1998). Doctors Who Choose to Reject the Old. The Independent 17-12-98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Age Concern (1997) Healthcare Rights for Older People. London: Age Concern England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldeman, R.D., Green, M.G. and Charon, R. (1991) Issues in Physician-Elder Interactions. Ageing and Society, 11, 127–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, R. (1959) Institutional Neurosis. London: John Wright.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1992) Risk Society. London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1996) The Reinvention of Politics. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (2000) The Brave New World of Work. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, S., Phillipson, C. and Kingston, P. (1995) Elder Abuse in Perspective. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beveridge, W. (1942) Social Insurance and Allied Services. London: HMSO Cmnd 5404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobbio, N. (1996) Left and Right. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosanquet, N. and Townsend, P. (Eds.) (1980) Labour and Equality. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1984) The Division of Labour in Society (Trans. W.D. Halls). Basingstoke: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebrahim, S. (2000) Do Not Resuscitate Decisions: Flogging Dead Horses or a Dignified Death. British Medical Journal 320, 1155–1156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A. (1995) The Spirit of Community. London: Fontana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A. (1997) The New Golden Rule. London: Profile.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, C. (1997) The Forgotten Patient. Daily Mail 14-04-97.

  • Fairclough, N. (2000) New Labour, New Language? London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, D. (1984) The Evolution of the British Welfare State. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geras, N. (1999) The Contract of Mutual Indifference. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1994) Beyond Left and Right. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1998) The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (2000) The Third Way and Its Critics. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, T.H. (1986) In P. Harris and J. Morrow (Eds.), Lectures on the Principles of Political Obligation and Other Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S. (1988) The Hard Road to Renewal: Thatcherism and the Crisis of the Left. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, P.Q. (Ed.) (1989) The Pluralist Theory of the State. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (1990) State Theory: Putting Capitalist States in Their Place. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavanagh, D. (1997) The Reordering of British Politics: Politics after Thatcher. Oxford: Oxford UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Letwin, S. (1992) The Anatomy of Thatcherism. London: Fontana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitas, R. (1988) The Inclusive Society? Social Exclusion and New Labour. London: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miliband, D. (1994) Reinventing Politics. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulgan, G. (1997) Life after Politics. London: Fontana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulgan, G. (1998) Connexity. London: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, J.F. (1991) Communication and Language in the Institutionalised Elderly. Ageing in Society 11, 149–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillipson, C. (1982) Capitalism and the Construction of Old Age. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robb, B. (1967) Sans Everything: A Case to Answer. London: Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royal Commission on Long Term Care (1999) With Respect to Old Age. London: The Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thane, P. (1996) Foundations of the Welfare State. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmins, N. (1996) The Five Giants: A Biography of the Welfare State. London: Fontana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titmuss, R. (1970) The Gift Relationship. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, P. (1962) The Last Refuge. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stapleton, J. (Ed.) (1995) Group Rights: Perspectives Since 1900. Bristol: Thoemmes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, A. (1991) The Social Construction of Dependency. In M. Looney et al. (Eds.), The State and the Market. London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson and Hughes (1986) The Elderly and Health Services. In C. Phillipson and A. Walker (Eds.), Ageing and Social Policy. Aldershot: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Primary Health Care and General Practice, Imperial College School of Medicine, Norfolk Place, London, W2 1PG

    Richard E. Ashcroft (Lecturer in Medical Ethics)

  2. Centre for Ethics in Medicine, University of Bristol, 73 St Michael's Hill, Bristol, BS2 8BH

    Alastair V. Campbell

  3. Centre for Ethics in Medicine, University of Bristol, 73 St Michael's Hill, Bristol, BS2 8BH

    Susan Jones

Authors
  1. Richard E. Ashcroft
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alastair V. Campbell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Susan Jones
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard E. Ashcroft.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ashcroft, R.E., Campbell, A.V. & Jones, S. Solidarity, Society and the Welfare State in the United Kingdom. Health Care Analysis 8, 377–394 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026595216507

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026595216507

Search

Navigation