PhilSci Archive

Reichenbach's Posits Reposited

Atkinson, David and Peijnenburg, Jeanne (2007) Reichenbach's Posits Reposited. [Preprint]

[img]
Preview
PDF
Reichenbachs_posits_reposited.pdf

Download (161kB)

Abstract

Reichenbach's use of `posits' to defend his frequentistic theory of probability has been criticized on the grounds that it makes unfalsifiable predictions. The justice of this criticism has blinded many to Reichenbach's second use of a posit, one that can fruitfully be applied to current debates within epistemology. We show first that Reichenbach's alternative type of posit creates a difficulty for epistemic foundationalists, and then that its use is equivalent to a particular kind of Jeffrey conditionalization. We conclude that, under particular circumstances, Reichenbach's approach and that of the Bayesians amount to the same thing, thereby presenting us with a new instance in which chance and credence coincide.


Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Preprint
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCID
Atkinson, David
Peijnenburg, Jeanne
Additional Information: Forthcoming in Erkenntnis
Keywords: Probability, posits, Reichenbach, Jeffrey.
Subjects: Specific Sciences > Probability/Statistics
General Issues > Confirmation/Induction
General Issues > Logical Positivism/Logical Empiricism
Depositing User: David Atkinson
Date Deposited: 23 Dec 2007
Last Modified: 07 Oct 2010 15:15
Item ID: 3722
Subjects: Specific Sciences > Probability/Statistics
General Issues > Confirmation/Induction
General Issues > Logical Positivism/Logical Empiricism
Date: December 2007
URI: https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/3722

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item