Skip to main content
Log in

Utopia and history. Some remarks about Nikolai Berdjaev’s struggle with history

  • Published:
Studies in East European Thought Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The article deals with the philosophy of Nikolai Berdjaev (1874–1948), which he formulated between The Philosophy of Inequality (written in 1918, but published in 1923) and The New Middle-Ages (1924). Berdjaev’s philosophy is analyzed in the context of the Russian Revolution of 1917 and its aftermath. The other point of reference is the crisis of culture and civilisation, which affected the West in the inter-war period. Berdjaev’s position has been interpreted in view of the archetypal myth of the struggle of the two principles, the principle of order (cosmos) and the forces of destruction (chaos). This myth is tied to the millenialist world view. Berdjaev took an anti-utopian stance. He juxtaposed the utopian-revolutionary principle with the hierarchical-creative one. From this position he criticized among others democracy, liberalism and socialism. In the midst of the crisis of the 1920s he remarked the possibility of spiritual rejuvenation putting forward the concept of the New Middle-Ages. One can say that at that time Berdjaev’s philosophy evolved within the conservative-creative framework, from the utopia of conservatism to the utopia of ‘free creativity’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Cioran (1995), p. 1047.

References

  • Berdjaev, N. (1923). Filosofija neravenstva. Berlin: Obelisk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berdjaev, N. (1969). Smysl istorii. Paris: YMCA-Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berdjaev, N. (2005). Novoe srednevekove, [in:] idem, Russkaja idea. Sankt-Peterburg: Midgrad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berdjaev, N. (2008). Samopoznanije. Moskva: Eksmo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cioran, E. (1995). Oeuvres. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, N. (2001). Cosmos, chaos and the World to come. New Haeven and London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elzenberg, H. (1991). Z filozofii kultury [The philosophy of culture]. Kraków: Znak.

  • Mannheim, K. (1954). Ideology and Utopia (L. Wirth & E. Shils, Trans.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

  • Mickiewicz, A. (2001). ‘Jacob Boehme ‘ [in:] Dzieła [The Works] (Vol. XIII). Warszawa: Czytelnik.

  • Ricoeur, P. (2005). L’idéologie et utopie. Paris: Édition du Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rydzewski, W. (1993). Powrót Bakunina [The return of Bakunin]. Kraków: BUS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szacki, J. (2000). Spotkania z utopią [Encounters with Utopia]. Warszawa: Sic!.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leszek Augustyn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Augustyn, L. Utopia and history. Some remarks about Nikolai Berdjaev’s struggle with history. Stud East Eur Thought 62, 71–79 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-010-9096-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-010-9096-9

Keywords

Navigation