Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ethics Consultation: Is it Enough to Mean Well?

  • Published:
HEC Forum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

REFERENCES

  1. Cranford RE, Doudera EA. The emergence of institutional ethics committees. In: Cranford RE, Doudera EA (eds.) Institutional ethics committees and health care decision making. Ann Arbor, MI: Health Administration Press; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  2. The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. Patients rights and organizational ethics. In: Comprehensive accreditation manual for hospitals. Chicago, IL: 1995. (See also the 1997 Manual: RI-1 to RI-32.)

  3. Ross JW, Glaser JW, Rasinski-Gregory D, Gibson JM, Bayley C. Health care ethics committees: The next generation. American Hospital Association: Chicago, IL; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tulsky JA, Fox E. Evaluating ethics consultation: Framing the questions. Journal of Clinical Ethics. 1996; 7:109–15.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fox E. Concepts in evaluation applied to ethics consultation research. Journal of Clinical Ethics. 1996; 7:116–21.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fox E, Arnold RM. Evaluating outcomes in ethics consultation research. Journal of Clinical Ethics. 1996; 7:127–38.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fox E, Tulsky JA. Evaluation research and the future of ethics consultation. Journal of Clinical Ethics. 1996; 7:146–49.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tulsky JA, Stocking CB. Obstacles and opportunities in the design of ethics consultation evaluation. Journal of Clinical Ethics. 1996; 7:139–45.

    Google Scholar 

  9. The Society for Health and Human Values-Society for Bioethics Consultation. Core competencies for health care ethics consultation: The report of the American Society for Bioethics and Humanities. Glenview, IL: American Society for Bioethics Consultation; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fletcher JC, Spencer EM. Ethics services in health care organizations. In: Fletcher JC, Lombardo PA, Marshall MF, Miller FG (eds.) Introduction to clinical ethics. 2nd ed., Frederick, MD: University Publishing Group; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 3rd ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Aulisio MP. Standards for decision making at the end of life. In: May T, Tudico P (eds.) Advance directives and surrogate decision making in Illinois. Medical Humanities Series. Springfield, IL: Southern Illinois University School of Medicine (forthcoming).

  13. Wicclair MR. Patient decision making capacity and risk. Bioethics. 1991;5:91–104.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Drane J. The many faces of competency. Hastings Center Report. 1985;15:17–21.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Buchanan AE, Brock DW. Deciding for others: The ethics of surrogate decision making. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  16. May T. Re-assessing the reliability of advance directives. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. 1997; 6:325–38.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Mark P. Aulisio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aulisio, M.P. Ethics Consultation: Is it Enough to Mean Well?. HEC Forum 11, 208–217 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008945430160

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008945430160

Keywords

Search

Navigation