Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Friedell, Morris F.
1983.
Human Dignity: A Naturalistic Perspective.
Humanity & Society,
Vol. 7,
Issue. 3,
p.
272.
Margolis, Joshua D.
2001.
Responsibility in Organizational Context.
Business Ethics Quarterly,
Vol. 11,
Issue. 3,
p.
431.
Pullman, Daryl
2004.
Death, Dignity, and Moral Nonsense.
Journal of Palliative Care,
Vol. 20,
Issue. 3,
p.
171.
Debes, Remy
2009.
DIGNITY'S GAUNTLET.
Philosophical Perspectives,
Vol. 23,
Issue. 1,
p.
45.
Bostrom, Nick
and
Sandberg, Anders
2009.
Cognitive Enhancement: Methods, Ethics, Regulatory Challenges.
Science and Engineering Ethics,
Vol. 15,
Issue. 3,
p.
311.
Nordenfelt, Lennart
2009.
Dignity in Care for Older People.
p.
26.
Jotterand, Fabrice
2010.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Human Dignity and Transhumanism: Do Anthro-Technological Devices Have Moral Status?”.
The American Journal of Bioethics,
Vol. 10,
Issue. 7,
p.
W6.
Ferguson, Robert A.
2011.
Merciful Judgments and Contemporary Society.
p.
19.
Carter, Ian
2011.
Respect and the Basis of Equality.
Ethics,
Vol. 121,
Issue. 3,
p.
538.
Nordenfelt, L.
2012.
Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics.
p.
800.
Waldron, Jeremy
2012.
HOW LAW PROTECTS DIGNITY.
The Cambridge Law Journal,
Vol. 71,
Issue. 1,
p.
200.
FitzPatrick, William J.
2013.
The International Encyclopedia of Ethics.
Bird, Colin
2013.
DIGNITY AS A MORAL CONCEPT.
Social Philosophy and Policy,
Vol. 30,
Issue. 1-2,
p.
150.
Jeffreys, Derek S.
2013.
Spirituality in Dark Places.
p.
103.
Zuckert, Michael
2014.
The Encyclopedia of Political Thought.
p.
933.
Brownsword, Roger
2014.
The Cambridge Handbook of Human Dignity.
p.
1.
2015.
Human Dignity.
p.
3.
Rodriguez, Philippe-André
2015.
Human dignity as an essentially contested concept.
Cambridge Review of International Affairs,
Vol. 28,
Issue. 4,
p.
743.
Edgar, Andrew
and
Nordenfelt, Lennart
2015.
Handbook of the Philosophy of Medicine.
p.
1.
Trousselard, Marion
and
Canini, Frédéric
2015.
What Are the Ethical Problems Raised by the Increase of Cognitive Capabilities in the Defence Structure: The French Legal Structure, the Ethical Position of the French Military Health Service.
Psychology,
Vol. 06,
Issue. 04,
p.
501.