Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Managerial Decision-Making on Moral Issues and the Effects of Teaching Ethics

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study uses judgment and decision-making (JDM) perspective with the help of framing and schema literature from cognitive psychology to evaluate how managers behave when problems with unethical overtones are presented to them in a managerial frame rather than an ethical frame. In the proposed managerial model, moral judgment of the situation is one of the inputs to managerial judgment, among several other inputs regarding costs and benefits of various alternatives. Managerial judgment results in managerial intent leading to managerial action. The model and the effects of taking an ethics course on ethical and managerial judgment and managerial intent were then indirectly tested in this study, wherein subjects judged the ethical wrongness, managerial badness, and the managerial intent regarding decisions made in a case. Forty-nine MBA students analyzed a case involving budget-based bonuses and production, in which the ethical issue evolved over three stages. It appears from the Path-analysis results that managerial judgment mediated between moral judgment and the judgment of managerial intent as suggested by the proposed model, and that taking an ethics course directly affected managerial judgment but did not affect the moral judgment. Additionally, in the first stage of decision-making (early stage of a developing “ethical slippery slope”), moral judgment did not significantly influence managerial judgment. However, students with ethics course still were more inclined to judge the decision as managerially bad as compared to others, indicating that they were more aware or sensitive to the moral issues involved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams G. B., Balfour D. L. (1998) Unmasking Administrative Evils. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications

    Google Scholar 

  • Arbuckle J. L., Wothke W. (1999) Amos 4.0 User’s Guide. Chicago, IL, SPSS Inc

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. and D. G. Bonnet: 1980, ‘Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures’, Psychological Bulletin 88, 588-606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bransford J. D., Johnson M. K. (1973) Considerations of Some Problems of Comprehension. In: Chase W. G. (ed) Visual Information Processing. New York, Academic Press

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown M. W., Cudeck R. (1989) Simple Sample Cross-validation Indices for Covariance Structures. Multivariate Behavioral Research 24: 445–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daft R. (2000) Management. New York, NY, Dryden Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Dienhart J. (2000) Business, Institutions, and Ethics. New York, Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Dienhart, J.: 2005, Syllabus for MBA512, Business Ethics and Social Responsibility, Winter Quarter 2005, Seattle University

  • Duska R. (1991) What’s the Point of a Business Ethics Course? Business Ethics Quarterly 1(4): 335–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske S. T., Taylor S. E. (1984) Social Cognition. New York, Random House

    Google Scholar 

  • Handy C. (1994) The Age of Paradox. Boston, MA, Harvard Business School Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellriegel D., Slocum J. W. Jr. (1986) Management. Cincinnati, OH, South-Western College Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackall R. (1988) Moral Mazes: The World of Corporate Managers. New York, NY, Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen M., Meckling W. (1976) Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3: 305–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen M., Meckling W. (1992) Specific and General Knowledge and Organizational Structure. In: Werin L. Wijkander H (eds)Contract Economics, Oxford, Blackwell

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T.: 1991, ‘Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue-Contingent Model’, Academy of Management Review 16(2), 366-395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D. (2003) A Perspective on Judgment and Choice. American Psychologist 58(9): 697–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeny, R.: 1994, ‚Creativity in Decision-Making with Value-Focused Thinking’, Sloan Management Review, Summer, 33–41

  • Marnburg, E.: 2003, ‚Educational Impacts on Academic Business Practitioner’s Moral Reasoning and Behavior: Effects of Short Courses in Ethics or Philosophy’, Business Ethics: A European Review, 12, 403–413

  • Mayer, P.: 1995, ‚A Surprisingly Simple Way to Make Better Decisions’, Executive Female, March–April, 13–14

  • McDonald, M.: 2001, A Framework for Ethical Decision-Making, Version 6.0, Ethics Shareware (Jan. ‚01), http://www.ethics.ubc.ca/people/mcdonald/decisions. htm

  • McNeil, B. J. et al.: 1982, ‚On the Elicitation of Preferences for Alternative Therapies’, New England Journal of Medicine, 306, 1259–1262

  • O’Fallon M., Butterfield K. (2005) A Review of the Empirical Decision-Making Literature: 1996–2003. Journal of Business Ethics 59: 375–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paolillo J. G. P., Vitell S. J. (2002) An Empirical Investigation of Influence of Selected Personal, Organizational, and Moral Intensity Factors on Ethical Decision Making. Journal of Business Ethics 35(1): 65–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rest J. (1986) Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory. New York, Praeger

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest J., Narvaez D., Bebeau M., Thoma S. (1999) A Neo-Kohlbergian Approach: The DIT and Schema Theory. Educational Psychology Review 11(4): 291–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rummelhart D. E. (1977) Introduction to Human Information Processing. New York, Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon H. A., Hayes J. R. (1976) Understanding Process: Problem Isomorphs. Cognitive Psychology 8: 165–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims R., Sims S. (1991) Increasing Applied Business Ethics Courses in Business School Curricula. Journal of Business Ethics 10(3): 211–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer M. S. (1996) The Role of Moral Intensity and Fairness Perception in Judgments of Ethicality: A Comparison of Managerial Professionals and the General Public. Journal of Business Ethics 15(4): 469–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singhapakdi A., Rao C. P., Vitell S. J. (1996) Ethical Decision Making: An Investigation of Services Marketing Professionals. Journal of Business Ethic 15(6): 635–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singhapakdi, A., S. J. Vitell and G. R. Franke: 1999, Antecedents, Consequences, and Mediating Effects of Perceive Moral Intensity and Personal Moral Philosophies, The Journal of Academy of Marketing Science 27(1), 19–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. E. and J. Crocker: 1981, ‘Schematic Bases of Social Processing’, in E. T.Higgins, C. P.Herman, and M. P. Zanna (eds.), Social Cognition: The Ontario Symposium, Vol 1. (Earlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ), pp. 89–134.

  • Trevino L. (1986) Ethical Decision-making in Organizations: A Person-Situation Interactionist Model. Academy of Management Review 11(3): 601–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky A., Kahneman D. (1986) Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions. Journal of Business 59 :S251–S278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman: 1992, ‘Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty’, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5, 297-323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velasquez, M. G.: 2006, Business Ethics: Concepts and Cases (Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Velasquez, M. G., C. Andre, T. Shanks and M. J. Meyer: 2005, “A Framework for Ethical Decision-Making”. Retrieved August 14, 2005 from http://www.scu. edu/ethics/practicing/decision/framework.html

  • Wagoner, R.: 2005, ‚Text of GM Address’, Wall Street Journal, June 7

  • Weber J. (1996) Influences Upon Managerial Decision Making: Nature of the Harm and Magnitude of Consequences. Human Relations, 49(1): 1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yates J. F. (1990) Judgment and Decision-making. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Young J. (2005) Changing Our Questions: Reflections on the Corporate Scandals. Accounting and the Public Interest 5: 1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman J. (2006) Accounting for Decision Making and Control. New York, McGraw-Hill Irwin

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I thank my colleagues, Susan Weihrich, John Dienhart, Jennifer Marrone, Greg Prussia, and Peter Raven, and the participants of 12th International Conference for Promoting Business Ethics, New York, 2005 for their input to this project. Financial support was provided by the Sea-First Volpe Fund, and Albers School of Business and Economics, Seattle University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Albers School of Business and Economics, Seattle University, 901 12th Avenue, Seattle, WA, 98122, U.S.A.

    Vidya N. Awasthi

Authors
  1. Vidya N. Awasthi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vidya N. Awasthi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Awasthi, V.N. Managerial Decision-Making on Moral Issues and the Effects of Teaching Ethics. J Bus Ethics 78, 207–223 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9328-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9328-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation