Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Dynamics for Modal Interpretations

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An outstanding problem in so-called modal interpretations of quantum mechanics has been the specification of a dynamics for the properties introduced in such interpretations. We develop a general framework (in the context of the theory of stochastic processes) for specifying a dynamics for interpretations in this class, focusing on the modal interpretation by Vermaas and Dieks. This framework admits many empirically equivalent dynamics. We give some examples, and discuss some of the properties of one of them. This approach is applicable to a wider class of theories, in particular, those using (discrete) strict effective—as in decoherence theory—superselection rules.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. B. van Fraassen, Synthese 42, 155 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  2. B. van Fraassen, Quantum Mechanics: An Empiricist View (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. Kochen, in Symposium on the Foundations of Modern Physics, P. Lahti and P. Mittelstaedt, eds. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1985), p. 151.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. Healey, The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics: An Interactive Interpretation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. Dieks, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig ) 7, 174 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. Dieks, Phys. Lett. A 142, 439 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. Dieks, Phys. Rev A 49, 2290 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. Vermaas and D. Dieks, Found. Phys. 25, 145 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. S. Bell, Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics (Cambridge Universit Press, Cambridge, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. Sudbery, Quantum Mechanics and the Particles of Nature (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. Sudbery, J. Phys. A Math. Gen. 20, 1743 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. Bub, Interpreting the Quantum World (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. Bub, Found. Phys. 22, 737 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. Bub, Found. Phys. 24, 1261 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. Bub and R. Clifton, Stud. Hist. Phil. Mod. Phys. 27, 181 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  16. G. Bacciagaluppi and M. Hemmo, in Ref. 20 (1998), p. 95.

  17. P. Vermaas, Stud. Hist. Phil. Mod. Phys. 27, 133 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  18. G. Bacciagaluppi, Modal Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, in press).

  19. D. Dieks and P. Vermaas (eds.), The Modal Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  20. G. Hellman and R. Healey (eds.), Quantum Measurement: Beyond Paradox (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  21. P. Vermaas, 's Look at Quantum Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, in press).

  22. M. Dickson, Found. Phys. Lett. 8, 231 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  23. M. Dickson, Found. Phys. Lett. 8, 401 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  24. R. Clifton, Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 46, 33 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  25. R. Clifton, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 755, 570 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  26. R. Clifton, Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 47, 371 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  27. M. Dickson, Probability and Nonlocality: Determinism Versus Indeterminism in Quantum Mechanics, Ph.D. thesis (University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  28. D. Dieks, Phys. Lett. A 197, 367 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  29. J. L. Bell and R. Clifton, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 34, 2409 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  30. J.Zimba and R. Clifton, in Ref. 19 (1998), p. 69.

  31. M. Dickson, Phil. Sci. 63 (Suppl.), 322 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  32. J. Zimba, Found. Phys. Lett. 11, 503 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  33. F. Arntzenius, in PSA 1990, Vol. 1, A. Fine, M. Forbes, and L. Wessels, eds. (Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, MI, 1990), p. 241.

    Google Scholar 

  34. P. Vermaas, in Ref. 20 (1998), p. 115.

  35. W. Zurek, Phys. Rev. D 24, 1516 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  36. H. Everett, Rev. Mod. Phys. 29, 454 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  37. G. Bacciagaluppi, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 34, 1206 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  38. S. Kochen and E. Specker, J. Math. Mech. 17, 59 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  39. D. Dieks, in Ref. 20 (1998), p. 144.

  40. P. Vermaas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 2033 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  41. J. S. Bell, in Ref. 9 (1987), p. 173.

  42. J. Vink, Phys. Rev. A 48, 1808 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  43. J. Bub, in The Cosmos of Science, J. Earman and J. Norton, eds. (University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, 1996), p. 274.

    Google Scholar 

  44. A. Sudbery, talk given at the 6th U.K. Meeting on the Foundations of Physics, University of Hull, Sept. (1997).

  45. D. Albert and B. Loewer, in PSA 1990, Vol. 1, A. Fine, M. Forbes, and L. Wessels, eds. (Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, MI, 1990), p. 277.

    Google Scholar 

  46. D. Albert and B. Loewer, Found. Phys. Lett. 6, 297 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  47. A. Elby, Found. Phys. Lett. 6, 5 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  48. G. Bacciagaluppi and M. Hemmo, in PSA 1994, Vol. 1, D. Hull, M. Forbes, and R. Burian, eds. (Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, MI, 1994), p. 345.

    Google Scholar 

  49. G. Bacciagaluppi and M. Hemmo, Stud. Hist. Phil. Mod. Phys. 27, 239 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  50. M. Dickson, in PSA 1994, Vol. 1, D. Hull, M. Forbes, and R. Burian, eds. (Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, MI, 1994), p. 366.

    Google Scholar 

  51. R. Healey, Found. Phys. Lett. 6, 37 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  52. R. Healey, Found. Phys. Lett. 6, 307 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  53. L. Ruetsche, Found. Phys. Lett. 8, 327 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  54. G. Bacciagaluppi, M. Donald, and P. Vermaas, Helv. Phys. Acta 68, 679 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  55. M. Donald, in Ref. 19 (1998), p. 213.

  56. J. S. Bell, in Ref. 9 (1987), p. 93.

  57. J. Doob, Stochastic Processes (Wiley, New York, 1953).

    Google Scholar 

  58. W. Feller, An Introduction to Probability Theory and its Applications (Wiley, New York, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  59. I. Gikhman and A. Skorokhod, The Theory of Stochastic Processes, Vols. 1-3, Kotz, trans. (Springer, Berlin, 1974-1979).

    Google Scholar 

  60. A. Kolmogorov, Math. Ann. 104, 415 (1931).

    Google Scholar 

  61. W. Feller, Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 48, 488 (1940); Errata in 58, 474 (1945).

    Google Scholar 

  62. G. Bacciagaluppi, Topics in the Modal Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, Ph.D. thesis (University of Cambridge, Cambridge, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  63. D. Bohm, Phys. Rev. 85, 166 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  64. E. Nelson, Quantum Fluctuations (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  65. K. Berndl, D. Dürr, S. Goldstein, G. Peruzzi, and N. Zanghi, Comm. Math. Phys. 173, 647 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  66. E. Carlen, Comm. Math. Phys. 94, 293 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  67. T. Kato, Perturbation Theory for Linear Operators (Springer, Berlin, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  68. F. Rellich, Perturbation Theory of Eigenvalue Problems (Gordon & Breach, New York, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  69. M. Reed and B. Simon, Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics, Vol. 4 (Academic, New York, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  70. E. Deotto and G. C. Ghirardi, Found. Phys. 28, 1 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  71. D. Bohm and B. Hiley, The Undivided Universe (Routledge, London and New York, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  72. G. Bacciagaluppi, Found. Phys. Lett. 12, 1–16 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  73. C. Cohen-Tannoudji, B. Diu, and F. Laloë, Quantum Mechanics, Vol. 1 (Wiley, New York, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  74. J. Cushing, private communication (Cambridge, 1995).

  75. G. Bacciagaluppi, in Ref. 19, (1998), p. 177.

  76. M. Dickson, Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 46, 197 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  77. M. Dickson, Quantum Chance and Non-locality (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  78. M. Dickson and R. Clifton, in Ref. 19 (1998), p. 9.

  79. G. Bacciagaluppi and J. Barrett, in preparation.

  80. A. Valentini, Phys. Lett. A 156, 5 (1991); Phys. Lett. A 158, 1 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  81. R. Clifton, in From Physics to Philosophy, J. Butterfield and C. Pagonis, eds. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge), in press.

  82. R. Clifton and H. Halvorson, preprint.

Download references

Authors
  1. Guido Bacciagaluppi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael Dickson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bacciagaluppi, G., Dickson, M. Dynamics for Modal Interpretations. Foundations of Physics 29, 1165–1201 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018803613886

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018803613886

Keywords

Search

Navigation