Abstract
A person is said to be ‘trust responsive’ if she fulfils trust because she believes the truster trusts her. The experiment we report was designed to test for trust responsiveness and its robustness across payoff structures, and to discriminate it from other possible factors making for trustworthiness, including perceived kindness, perceived need and inequality aversion. We elicit the truster’s confidence that the trustee will fulfil, and the trustee’s belief about the truster’s confidence after the trustee receives evidence relevant to this. We find evidence of strong trust responsiveness. We also find that perceptions of kindness and of need increase trust responsiveness, and that they do so only in conjunction with trust responsiveness.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bacharach, M.O.L. and Gambetta, D. (2001a). Trust in signs, in Cook, K. (ed), Trust in Society, Russell Sage Foundation: New York.
Bacharach, M.O.L. and Gambetta, D. (2001b), Trust as type detection, in Castelfranchi, C., Tan, Y.-H., et al. (eds.), Deception, Fraud and Trust in Agent Societies, Kluwer: Dordrecht.
Bacharach, M.O.L., Guerra, G. and Zizzo, D.J. (2001), Is trust self-fulfilling? An experimental Study, Discussion Paper no. 76, Department of Economics, University of Oxford.
Berg J., Dickhaut J., Mccabe K. (1995). Trust, reciprocity and social history. Games and Economic Behavior 10, 122–142
Blount S. (1995) When social outcomes aren’t fair: the effect of causal attributions on preferences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 63, 131–144
Bolle F. (1995) Rewarding trust: an experimental study. Theory and Decision 25, 83–98
Bolton G., Ockenfels A. (2000) ERC – A theory of equity, reciprocity and competition. American Economic Review 90, 166–193
Charness G., Rabin M. (2002) Understanding social preferences with simple tests. Quarterly Journal of Economics 117, 817–869
Coleman J. (1990) Foundations of Social Theory. Belkamp, Harvard
Croson R.T.A. (2000) Thinking like a game theorist: factors affecting the frequency of equilibrium play. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 41, 299–314
Dufwenberg M. (2002) Marital investments, time consistency, and emotions. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 48, 57–69
Dufwenberg M., Gneezy U. (2000) Measuring beliefs in an experimental lost wallet game. Games and Economic Behavior 30, 163–182
Falk A., Fischbacher U. (2001) Distributional consequences and intentions in a model of reciprocity. Annales d’Economie et de Statistique 63–64, 111–129
Fehr E., Gächter S. (1997) How effective are trust and reciprocity-based incentives?. In: Ben-Ner A., Putterman L. (eds). Economics, Value and Organisation. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge
Fehr E., Schmidt K.M. (1999) A theory of fairness, competition and cooperation. Quarterly Journal of Economics 114, 817–868
Frey B., Oberholzer-Gee F. (1997) The cost of price incentives: an empirical analysis of motivation crowding-out. American Economic Review 87, 746–755
Gambetta D. (eds) (1988) Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations. Blackwell: Oxford
Geanakopolos J., Pearce D., Stacchetti E. (1989) Psychological games and sequential rationality. Games and Economic Behavior 1, 60–79
Glaeser E., Laibson D., Scheinkman J., Soutter C. (2000) Measuring trust. Quarterly Journal of Economics 115, 811–846
Guerra, G. and Zizzo, D.J. (2004), Trust responsiveness and beliefs, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization forthcoming.
Guilkey D.K., Murphy J.L. (1993) Estimation and testing in the random effects probit model. Journal of Econometrics 59, 301–317
Hardin R. (1991) Trusting persons, trusting institutions. In: Zeckhauser R. (eds). Strategy and Choice. MIT Press: Cambridge
Hargreaves Heap S., Hollis M., Lyons B., Sugden R., Weale A. (1992) The Theory of Choice. Blackwell: Oxford
Hausman, D. (1998), Fairness and trust in game theory, Mimeo, London School of Economics.
Hirschman A.O. (1984) Against parsimony. Three easy ways of complicating some categories of economic discourse. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 74, 88–96
Hollis M. (1998) Trust within Reason. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge
Huck S., Weiszäcker G. (2002) Do players correctly estimate what others do?. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 47, 71–85
Hume D. (1740[1978]) Treatise on Human Nature. Clarendon Press: Oxford
Jussim L. (1986) Self-fulfilling prophecies: a theoretical and integrative review. Psychological Review 93, 429–445
McCabe K., Rigdon M., Smith V. (2003) Positive reciprocity and intentions in trust games. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 52, 267–275
Orbell J.M., Dawes R.M. (1991) A ‘cognitive miser’ theory of cooperator’s advantage. American Political Science Review 85, 515–528
Pelligra, V. (2000), Goldfish and game theory: a problem of trust, Mimeo, School of Economic and Social Studies, University of East Anglia.
Pettit P. (1995) The cunning of trust. Philosophy and Public Affairs 29, 202–225
Putnam R.D., Leonardi R., Nanetti R.Y. (1993) Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton University Press: Princeton
Rabin M. (1993) Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. American Economic Review 83, 1281–1302
Schotter, A. and Sopher, B. (2006), Trust and trustworthiness in inter-generational games: an experimental study of inter-generational advice, Experimental Economics forthcoming.
Schotter A., Weiss A., Zapater I. (1996) Fairness and survival in ultimatum and dictator games. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 31, 37–56
Wrightsman L.S. (1966) Personality and attitudinal correlates of trusting and trustworthy behaviors in a two-person game. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 4, 328–332
Zizzo, D.J. (2000), Relativity-sensitive behaviour in economics, Doctoral thesis, University of Oxford.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bacharach, M., Guerra, G. & Zizzo, D.J. The Self-Fulfilling Property of Trust: An Experimental Study. Theor Decis 63, 349–388 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-007-9043-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-007-9043-5