Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Professional values in community and public health pharmacy

  • Scientific Contribution
  • Published:
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

General practice (community) pharmacy as a healthcare profession is largely devoted to therapeutic treatment of individual patients whether in dispensing medically authorised prescriptions or by providing members of the public with over-the-counter advice and service for a variety of common ailments. Recently, community pharmacy has been identified as an untapped resource available to undertake important aspects of public health and in particular health promotion. In contrast to therapeutic treatment, public health primarily concerns the health of the entire population, rather than the health of individuals (Childress et al. in J Law Med Ethics 30:170–178, 2002). Thus, an important question for the profession is whether those moral and professional values that are appropriate to the therapeutic care of individual patients are relevant and adequate to support the additional public health role.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. All pharmacists are able to supply certain designated more potent medicines without prescription and within specified circumstances. Additionally, some pharmacists (pharmacist independent prescribers) are trained and are authorised to manage, prescribe for and more directly treat patients in certain specified therapeutic areas, e.g. hypertension. Regulations to allow independent prescribing by pharmacists came into effect in May 2006. Pharmacist independent prescribers can prescribe for any clinical condition but they must only prescribe within their professional and clinical competence. These changes mark a significant shift of emphasis from a purely methodological, product-focussed and somewhat impersonal relationship with patients to a more directly patient-centred practice of pharmaceutical care.

  2. Both Wanless reports are downloadable from www.dh.gov.uk/publications.

  3. Interview for BBC Woman’s Hour programme September 23rd 1987.

  4. Yet it is interesting to note that UK pharmacists are now encouraged to not only: build stronger bonds with their customers by promoting a culture of greater health literacy for all—particularly those who live in areas of greater social deprivation or where significant health inequalities persist and (but also) take on a community leadership role, providing positive action that makes a significant contribution to tackling the root causes of health determinants, such as fuel poverty and benefits uptake and signposting to services or hosting other service providers in pharmacy premises. (Pharmacy in England. Building on strengthsdelivering the future (2008 pp. 51–6).

  5. This is not to suggest that causal inference offers anything approaching near certainty. For a valuable debate on some of the relevant considerations see Rothman ed. (1988).

References

  • A Vision for Pharmacy in the New NHS. 2003. London: Department of Health. http://www.dh.gov.uk/publications.

  • Acheson, D. 1988. Public health in England. London: Department of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, S. 2007. Community pharmacy, public health in Great Britain.1936 to 2006: how a phoenix rose from the ashes. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 61: 844–848.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ahern, J.A., S. Galea, A. Hubbard, and A. Karpati. 2008. Population vulnerabilities and capacities related to health: A test model. Social Science and Medicine 66: 691–703.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, M. 2007. Public health: Why pharmacy counts. The Pharmaceutical Journal 278: 13–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badcott, D. 2010. The profession of pharmacy in the United Kingdom: Changing values`. In Emerging values in health care. The challenge for professionals, ed. S. Pattison, et al., 145–159. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, D. 1983. What is public about public health? Health Affairs 2(4): 76–87.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Björkman, I.K., C.B. Bernsten, and M.A. Sanner. 2008. Care ideologies reflected in 4 conceptions of pharmaceutical care. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy 4: 332–342.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Childress, J.F., et al. 2002. Public health ethics: Mapping the terrain. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 30: 170–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choosing health thorough pharmacy—A programme for pharmaceutical public health 2005–2015. 2005. London: Department of Health. http://www.dh.gov.uk/publications.

  • Faculty of Public Health of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom. What is Public Health? http://www.fphm.org.uk/about_faculty/what_public_health/default.asp. Accessed August 2009.

  • Fassett, W.E. 2007. Ethics, law and the emergence of responsibility for patient care. Annals of Pharmacotherapy 41: 1264–1267.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodin, R.E. 1985. Protecting the vulnerable. A reanalysis of our social responsibilities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, G., and K. Taylor. 1997. Responding to change: The case of community pharmacy in Great Britain. Sociology of Health & Illness 19(5): 547–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Häyry, M. 2006. Public health and human values. Journal of Medical Ethics 32: 519–521.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hepler, C.D., and L.M. Strand. 1990. Opportunities and responsibilities in pharmaceutical care. American Journal of Hospital Pharmacy 47: 533–543.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jesson, J., and P. Bissell. 2006. Public health and pharmacy: A critical review. Critical Public Health 16(2): 159–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenreigh, C.A., and L.T. Wagner. 2006. Pharmacists` role in healthcare still evolving. Medscape Pharmacists 8(2): 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klugman, C.M. 2007. Public health principlism. Journal of Health Ethics 4(1): 1–14. http://www.ojhe.org.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohatsu, N., J. Robinson, and J. Torner. 2004. Evidence-based public health. An evolving concept. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 27(5): 417–421.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McKinnon, J. (ed.). 2007. Towards prescribing practice. Chichester: John Wiley

  • Moberly, T. 2007. Prescription-linked public health. The Pharmaceutical Journal 278: 15–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuffield Committee of Inquiry into Pharmacy. 1986. Nuffield Committee of Inquiry into Pharmacy. A Report to the Nuffield Foundation. London: The Nuffield Foundation.

  • Public health: ethical issues. 2007. Nuffield Council on Bioethics. London: The Nuffield Foundation. http://www.nuffieldbioethics.org.

  • Pharmacy in England. 2008. Pharmacy in England. Building on strengthsdelivering the future. United Kingdom: Department of Health. http://www.dh.gov.uk/publications.

  • Rogers, A. 2009. Community pharmacists still don’t care. The Pharmaceutical Journal 283: 413–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rokeach, M. 1968–1969. The role of values in public opinion research. Public Opinion Quarterly 32(4): 547–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, G. 1992. The strategy of preventive medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, K. (ed.). 1988. Causal inference. Chestnut Hill: Epidemiology Resources Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, R.M. and D.B. Brushwood. 1991. The pharmacist’s role in patient care. The Hastings Center Report 21.

  • Strand, L. 1998. Building a practice in pharmaceutical care (Hoechst Marion Roussel Lecture). The Pharmaceutical Journal 260: 874–876.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Congress House Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce, Subcommittee on Health Environment. 1976. A discursive dictionary of health care, 94th Cong., 2d session. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.

  • Wang, L.-N. 2008. How to sell health and well-being. The Pharmaceutical Journal 278: 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanless, D. 2002. Securing our future healthtaking a long-term view. London: Department of Health. www.dh.gov.uk/publications.

  • Wanless, D. 2004. Securing good health for the whole population. London: Department of Health. http://www.dh.gov.uk/publications.

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to express my thanks to the anonymous referees whose comments helped to frame and clarify important aspects of this paper, and to Pekka Louhiala for his patient and helpful advice.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Badcott.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Badcott, D. Professional values in community and public health pharmacy. Med Health Care and Philos 14, 187–194 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-010-9281-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-010-9281-0

Keywords

Navigation