Skip to main content
Log in

Religions and States. A New Typology and a Plea for Non-Constitutional Pluralism

  • Published:
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Political philosophy has difficulties to cope with the complexity and variety of state-religions relations. ‘Strict separationism’ is still the preferred option amongst liberals, deliberative and republican democrats, socialist and feminists. In this article, I develop a complex typology based on comparative history and sociology of religions. I summarize my reasons why institutional pluralist models like plural establishment or non-constitutional pluralism are attractive not only for religious minorities but for religiously deeply diverse societies in general. Most attention is paid defending associative democracy, the most flexible and open variety of institutional pluralism, against realist objections that group representation is incompatible with liberal democracy, that it leads to stigmatization and bureaucratization, that it strengthens undemocratic leaders, that it leads to an ossification of the status quo, and, most importantly, that it is inherently divisive undermining social cohesion and political unity. In my refutation of these objections I try to show that it helps to integrate minority religions into liberal democratic policies compatible with reasonable pluralism and to prevent religious and political fundamentalism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahonen, P., A Minority State-Church in a Liberal Democracy. ECPR Copenhagen, 14–19 April, 2000.

  • Bader, V.M., Kollektives Handeln. Opladen: Leske + Budrich, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bader, V.M., Incorporation. Unpublished Manuscript (http://home.hum.uva.nl/oz/baderv), 1996.

  • Bader, V.M., Egalitarian Multiculturalism: Institutional separation and Cultural Pluralism, in R. Bauböck and J. Rundell (eds.), Blurred Boundaries. Aldershot, Ashgate, 1998, pp. 185–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bader, V.M., Dilemmas of Ethnic Affirmative Action. Benign State-neutrality or Relational Ethnic Neutrality, Citizenship Studies 2(3) (1998a), pp. 435–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bader, V.M., Religious Pluralism. Secularism or Priority for Democracy?, Political Theory 27(5), October 1999, pp. 597–633.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bader, V.M., How to Institutionalize Religious Pluralism? Conference Paper, Bremen, May 2000.

  • Bader, V.M., Culture and Identity. Contesting Constructivism, in Ethnicities 1(2) (April 2001), pp. 251–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bader, V.M., Problems and Prospects of Associative Democracy, in P. Hirst and V. Bader (eds.), Associative Democracy — The Real Third Way? CRISPP 4(1), January 2001a, pp. 31–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bader, V.M., Associative Democracy and the Incorporation of Ethnic and National Minorities, in P. Hirst and V. Bader (eds.), Associative Democracy. The Real Third Way. London: Frank Cass, 2001b, pp. 187–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bader, V.M., Cohesion, Unity and Stability in Modern Societies, in A. v. Harskamp and A.A. Musschenga (eds.), The Many Faces of Individualism. Leuven: Peeters, 2001c, pp. 107–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bader, V.M., Ethnic and Religious State-Neutrality: Utopia or Myth? (2001d), in Hakan Sicakkan and Yngve Lithman (eds.), Modes of Belonging and Politics of Recognition. Berg, 2003 (forthcoming).

  • Bader, V.M., Pluralisme ernstig nemen. Politieke Filosofie en het Neo-Institionalisme. Pleidooi voor een institutionele wending in de politieke filosofie, Ethiek & Maatschappij 4(3) (Oktober 2001 (2001e)), pp. 11–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bader, V.M., Democratic Institutional Pluralism and Cultural Diversity. (2001f), in Danielle Juteau and Christiane Harzig (eds.), Life in Diversity. Berghan, 2003 (forthcoming).

  • Bader, V.M., “Diversity within Unity”: A Dialogue Opener (A. Etzioni). Critical Remarks and Suggestions (2001g).

  • Bader, V.M., Religious Diversity and Democratic Institutional Pluralism (2002), Political Theory 2003.

  • Bader, V.M., Democratic Institutional Pluralism. Conference ECIP, Amsterdam, July (2002a).

  • Bader, V.M., Associative Democracy and Minorities within Minorities. Conference Lincoln, Nebraska, October 2002 (2002b).

  • Bader, V.M., Taking Religious Pluralism Seriously. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 6(1) (2003), pp. 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, E., Beckford, J., and Dobbelaere, K. (eds.), Secularization, Rationalism and Sectarianism. Oxford: Clarendon, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, D (ed.), The World Christian Encyclopedia. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, S. (ed.), Religion and Modernization. Oxford: Clarendon, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carens, J., Culture, Citizenship, and Community. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casanova, J., Public Religions in the Modern World. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaves, M., and Cann, D., Regulation, Pluralism, and Religious Market Structure, Rationality and Society 4 (1992), pp. 272–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole Durham, Jr., W., The Right to Autonomy in Religious Affairs: A Comparative View, in G. Robbers (ed.), Church Autonomy. Frankfurt a. M.: Peter Lang, 2001, pp. 683–714.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demerath, N.J., and Williams, R.H., A. Mythical Past and an Uncertain Future, in T. Robbins and R. Robertson (eds.), Church-State Relations. New Brunswick: Transaction Inc., 1987, pp. 77–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doomernik, J., The Institutionalization of Turkish Islam in Germany and the Netherlands, Ethnic and Racial Studies 18(1) (1995).

  • Eisenach, E.J., The Next Religious Establishment. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, A., Reconstructing Political Pluralism. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esbeck, C., A Typology of Church-State Relations in Current American Thought, in Lugo (ed.), Religion, Public Life, and the American Polity. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press, 2001, pp. 3–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galanter, M., Religious Freedoms in the United States. A Turning Point, Wisconsin Law Review (1996), pp. 217–296.

  • Galston, W., Liberal Pluralism. Cambridge University Press, 2002.

  • Gowricharn, R., and Saharso, S. (eds.), Islam in Nederland. Themanummer Migrantenstudies 13(3) (1997).

  • Grillo, R.D., Pluralism and the Politics of Difference. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenawalt, K., Private Consciences and Public Reasons. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenawalt, K., Five Questions about Religion Judges are Afraid to Ask, in N. Rosenblum (ed.), Obligations of Citizenship and Demands of Faith. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000, pp. 196–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handy, R.T., A History of the Churches in the United States and Canada. Oxford: Clarendon, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heikkilae, M., Knuutila, J., and Scheinin, M., State and Church in Finaldn, in G. Robbers (ed.), State and Church in the European Union. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1996, pp. 279–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, H.N., Let Them Eat Incidentals, in N. Rosenblum (ed.), Obligations of Citizenship and Demands of Faith. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000, pp. 280–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, P., Associative Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, P., and J.N. Figgis, Churches and the State, in D. Marquand and R. Nettler (eds.), Obligations of Citizenship and Demands of Faith. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000, pp. 104–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, P., Comment. Amsterdam workshop, June 29, 2001.

  • Hoekema, A. et al., Integraal Bestuur. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoekema, A. et al., Negotiating governance and indigenous self-rule, in P. Hirst and V. Bader (eds.), Associative Democracy. The Real Third Way. London: Frank Cass, 2001, pp. 157–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollinger, D., Religious Disestablishment in Western Europe, The Responsive Community (2002) (forthcoming).

  • Horowitz, D., Making Moderation Pay, in J. Montville (ed.), Conflict and Peace-Making in Multiethnic Societies. New York: Lexington, 1991, pp. 115–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsohn, R.J., By the Light of Reason, in N. Rosenblum (ed.), Obligations of Citizenship and Demands of Faith. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000, pp. 294–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Israel, J.I., The Dutch Republic. Oxford: Clarendon, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaspersen, L., and Ottesen, L., Associationalism for 150 Years, in P. Hirst and V.M. Bader (eds.), Associative Democracy. The Real Third Way. London: Frank Cass, 2001, pp. 105–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalyvas, S., The Rise of Christian Democracy in Europe. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keane, J., Secularism? in D. Marquand and R. Nettler (eds.), Obligations of Citizenship and Demands of Faith. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000, pp. 5–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khilnani, S., The Idea of India. New York: Farrar, Straus, Giroux, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans, R., Zachte heelmeesters..., Migrantenstudies 2 (2002), pp. 87–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, W., Multicultural Citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, W., States, Nations and Cultures. Assen: van Gorcum, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, W., Contemporary Political Philosophy, 2nd. Ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, W., and Norman, W. (eds.), Citizenship in Diverse Societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lash, K., Five Models of Church Autonomy, in G. Robbers (eds.), State and Church in the European Union. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2001, pp. 303–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmbruch, G., Der Beitrag der Korporatismusforschung zur Entwicklung der Steuerungstheorie, Politische Vierteljahres Schrift 17(4) (1996), pp. 735–751.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, A., Democracies. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, A., Self-Determination vs. Pre-Determination in Powersharing Systems, in W. Kymlicka (ed.), The Rights of Minority Cultures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995, pp. 275–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luckmann, T., Invisible Religion. New York, MacMillan, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N., Funktion der Religion. Frankfurt, M. Suhrkamp, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N., Die Religion der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madeley, J., Towards an Inclusive Typology of Church-State Relations in Europe. ECPR Copenhagen, 14–19 April, 2000.

  • Marquand, D., and Nettler, R. (eds.), Religion and Democracy. Oxford: Blackwell, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, D., A General Theory of Secularization. New York: Harper & Row, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, H., Religion and the People of Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, M., Accommodation of Religion, George Washington Law Review 60(3) (1992), pp. 685–742.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, M., Believers as Equal Citizens, in N. Rosenblum (ed.), Obligations of Citizenship and Demands of Faith. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000, pp. 90–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minnerath, R., Church Autonomy in Europe, in G. Robbers (ed.), Church Autonomy. Frankfurt a. M.: Peter Lang, 2001, pp. 381–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, W.L., The First Liberty. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc., 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minkenberg, M., Religion and Policy Effects. ECPR Copenhagen, 14–19 April, 2000.

  • Monsma, S., and Soper, C., The Challenge of Pluralism. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modood, T. (ed.), Church, State and Religious Minorities. London, Policy Studies Institute, 1996 (contributions by Tariq Modood, Bikhu Parekh, Anne Phillips, Bishop Michael Nazir-Ali, Vaerie Pitt, Adrian Hastings, Jim Herrick, Rabbi Sylvia Rothschild, Ramindar Singh, Dharmchari Kulananda, Deepak Naik, Daoud Rosser-Owen) Quoted as PSI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modood, T., Comment workshop, Amsterdam, June 29, 2001.

  • Moore, R.L., Selling God. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parekh, B., Rethinking Multiculturalism. Houndsmill: MacMillan, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parekh, B., Comment workshop, Amsterdam, June 29, 2001.

  • Penninx, R., and Schrover, M., Splijtzwam of Bindmiddel. De organisatie van migranten in een lange-termijn perspectief. NWO/NMPS paper 2001.

  • Plesner, I., State Church and Church Autonomy in Norway, in G. Robbers (ed.), Church Autonomy. Frankfurt a. M.: Peter Lang, 2001, pp. 467–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, L., Religious Exemptions, in T. Robbins and R. Robertson (eds.), Church-State Relations. New Brunwick: Transaction Inc., 1987, pp. 103–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • PSI: see Modood, T. (ed.), 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rath, J., Penninx, R., Groenendijk, K., and Meijer, A., Nederland en zijn Islam. Amsterdam, Spinhuis, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rath, J., Penninx, R., Groenendijk, K., and Meijer, A., De Nederlandse samenleving en haar islam. And: Repliek, Migrantenstudies 13(2) (1997), pp. 69–80, 113–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbers, G. (ed.), State and Church in the European Union. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbers, G. (ed.), Church Autonomy. Frankfurt a. M.: Peter Lang, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, T., and Anthony, D. (eds.), In Gods We Trust. New Brunswick: Transaction Books, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, T., and Anthony, D., Church-State Tensions and Marginal Movements, in T. Robbins and R. Robertson (eds.), Church-State Relations. New Brunwick: Transaction Inc., 1987, pp. 135–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, T., and Anthony, D., Church-State Tensions in the United States, in T. Robbins and R. Robertson (eds.), Church-State Relations. New Brunwick: Transaction Inc., 1987a, pp. 67–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, T., and Robertson, R. (eds.), Church-State Relations. New Brunswick: Transaction Inc., 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, R., General Considerations in the Study of Contemporary Chuch-State Relationships, in T. Robbins and R. Robertson (eds.), Church-State Relations. New Brunswick: Transaction Inc., 1987, pp. 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, R., Church-State Relations in Comparative Perspective, in T. Robbins and R. Robertson (eds.), Church-State Relations. New Brunswick: Transaction Inc., 1987a, pp. 153–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rooden, P.v., Religieuze Regimes. Amsterdam: Bakker, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblum, N., Membership and Morals. Princeton etc.: Princeton University Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblum, N. (ed.), Introduction: Pluralism, Integralism, and Political Theories of Religious Accommodation, in Obligations of Citizenship and Demands of Faith. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000, pp. 3–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblum, N. (ed.), Religious Autonomy and the Moral Uses of Pluralism, in Obligations of Citizenship and Demands of Faith. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000a, 165–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblum, N., Religious Parties, Religious Political Identity, etc., Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 6(1), (2003), pp. 23–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblum, N. (ed.), Obligations of Citizenship and Demands of Faith. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudolph, S.H., and Rudolph, L., Living with Difference in India, in D. Marquand and R. Nettler (eds.), Obligations of Citizenship and Demands of Faith. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000, pp. 19–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shachar, A., Multicultural Jurisdictions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sisk, T., Power Sharing and international mediation in ethnic conflicts. Carnegie Coop. Of New York, 1996.

  • Spinner-Halev, J., Surviving Diversity. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swaine, L., How ought liberal democracies to treat theocratic communities?, Ethics 111 (2001), pp. 302–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasi, J., Liberalism Beyond Justice. Princeton, Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valadez, J., Deliberative Democracy, Political Legitimacy, and Selfdetermination in Multicultural Societies. Boulder: Westview, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, M., On Toleration. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M., Toward a Deliberative Understanding of Justice Toward Groups. Manuscript (2001).

  • Williams, M., Tolerable Liberalism. Paper, Lincoln Nebraska, 2002.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bader, V. Religions and States. A New Typology and a Plea for Non-Constitutional Pluralism. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 6, 55–91 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023294302099

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023294302099

Navigation