Abstract
Nineteenth century hygiene might be a confusing concept. On the one hand, the concept of hygiene was gradually becoming an important concept that was focused on cleanliness and used interchangeably with sanitation. On the other hand, the classical notions of hygiene rooted in the Hippocratic teachings remained influential. This study is about two attempts to newly theorise such a confusing concept of hygiene in the second half of the century by Edward. W. Lane and Thomas R. Allinson. Their works, standing on the borders of self-help medical advice and theoretical treatises on medical philosophies, were not exactly scholarly ones, but their medical thoughts - conceptualised as hygienic medicine - show a characteristically holistic medical view of hygiene, a nineteenth-century version of the reinterpretation of the nature cure philosophy and vitalism. However, the aim of this study is to properly locate their conceptualisations of hygienic medicine within the historical context of the second half of the nineteenth century rather than to simply introduce the medical ideas in their books. Their views of hygiene were distinguished not only from the contemporary sanitary approach but also from similar attempts by contemporary orthodox and unorthodox medical doctors. Through a chronological analysis of changes in the concept of hygiene and a comparative analysis of these two authors’ and other medical professionals’ views of hygiene, this paper aims to help understand the complicated picture of nineteenth-century hygiene, particularly during the second half of the century, from the perspective of medical holism and reductionism.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and material
Not applicable
Code availability
Not applicable
Notes
Combe’s essay on the question aroused an intensive debate in the society leading to some legal proceedings: (1847). Memoir of the Life and Writings of the Late Dr Andrew Combe. The Phrenological Journal, and Magazine of Moral Science, 20 (93), 373–407, p. 392.
In this sense, nineteenth century hygiene followed the similar path to that of medicine (see Weisz, 2003).
The Letter written by Lane was read by Dr B. W. Richardson, F.R.S. at his lecture on Charles Darwin, F.R.S. in St. George’s Hall, Langham Place, October 22nd, 1882. (from http://darwin-online.org.uk/recollections.html)
The society later merged with the Vegetarian Society as its London branch in 1885 but again separated as the London Vegetarian Society in 1888.
They were reprinted later in five volumes of books with the title of Medical Essays (1887–1893).
The Royal College of Physicians also unregistered his licentiateship the same year.
In this article I intentionally adopt this perspective, rather than the perspective of public health, as my focus is on changes and trends in terms of the intellectual history of hygiene, rather than social or medical discourses on public health itself.
This article was anonymously written: (1843). The Poor-Law Commission and Boards of Health. Provincial Medical and Surgical Journal, s1-5, 292–293, p.292.
This review was anonymously written: (1866). Reviews and Bibliographical Notices. New York Medical Journal, 4(20), 131–132, pp. 131.
Hygiene was indeed one of the most fundamental concepts on which various types of purgative or laxative medications and practices were grounded (Whorton, 2000).
Although this journal ran for only eleven issues in total, it was the only periodical on hydropathy published in Britain in the period spanning the 1850s to the 1880s. Whether Lane was involved in the publication of the journal is unclear. Lane did not contribute any article or letter to it, and he only once advertised his 1859 book in the journal.
The article was anonymously written: (1868). To Our Readers. The Hydropathic Record and Journal of the Water Cure, 1(1), 1–2, p. 1.
An anonymous article shows this inclination: (1869). Our Specialty. The Hydorpahtic Record and Journal of the Water Cure, 1(4), 65–66.
References
Ackerknecht, E. H. (1948a). Hygiene in France. Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 22(2), 1815–1848
Ackerknecht, E. H. (1948b). Anticontagionism between 1821 and 1867. Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 22(5), 562–593
Adams, J. M. (2015). Healing with water: English spas and the water cure, 1840–1960. Manchester University Press
Allinson, T. R. (1881). An anaesthetic car. BMJ, 2(1072), 110
Allinson, T. R. (1882a). Autumnal diarrhœa. The Lancet, 120(3081), 463–364
Allinson, T. R. (1882b).Tapeworm. BMJ, 2(1128),296
Allinson, T. R. (1886). System of hygienic medicine, or, the only rational way of treating disease. Frederick Pitman
Ashenburg, K. (2011). Clean: An unsanitised history of washing. Profile Books
Barrow, L. (1991). Why were most medical heretics at their most confident around the 1840s? In R. French, & A. Wear (Eds.), British medicine in an age of reform (pp. 165–185). Routledge
Baldwin, P. (1999). Contagion and the state in Europe, 1830–1930. Cambridge University Press
Beale, L. J. (1855). On personal and domestic hygiene. John Churchill
Beddoes, T. (1802). Hygëia: Or, essays moral and medical, on the causes affecting the personal state of our middling and affluent classes. Phillips
Bennett, J. H. (1871). Physiology as a branch of general education: A graduation address delivered August, 1 vol., (p. 1871). Edmonston and Douglas
Beresford, M. J. (2010). Medical reductionism: Lessons from the great philosophers. An International Journal of Medicine, 103(9), 721–724
Bergdolt, K. (2008). Wellbeing: A cultural history of healthy living (trans: Dewhurst, J.). Wiley
Berge, A. E. F. L. (1992). Mission and method: The early nineteenth-century French public health movement. Cambridge University Press
Bradley, J. (2002). Medicine on the margins? Hydropathy and orthodoxy in Britain, 1840–60. In W. Ernst (Ed.), Plural medicine, tradition and modernity, 1800–2000, (pp. 19–39). Routledge
Bradley, J., & Dupree, M. (2003). A shadow of orthodoxy? An epistemology of British hydropathy. Medical History, 47(2), 1840–1858
Brown, P. S. (1991). Medically qualified naturopaths and the General Medical Council. Medical History, 35(1), 50–77
Buchan, W. (1769). Domestic medicine; or the family physician. Auld, and Smellie
Burn, R. S. (1872). Sanitary science: As applied to the healthy construction of houses in town and country. William Collins, Sons, & Company
Buxton, H. (2018). Health by design: Teaching cleanliness and assembling hygiene at the nineteenth-century sanitation museum. The British Journal for the History of Science, 51(3), 457–485
Bynum, W. F. (1994). Science and the practice of medicine in the nineteenth century. Cambridge University Press
Carroll, P. E. (2002). Medical police and the history of public health. Medical History, 46(4), 461–494
Carter, K. C. (2012). The decline of therapeutic bloodletting and the collapse of traditional medicine. Transaction Publishers
Cawadias, A. P. (1937). Neohippocratism. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, 31(1), 27–38
Cody, G. W., & Hascall, H. (2012). The history of naturopathic medicine. In J. E. Pizzorno, & M. T. Murray (Eds.), Textbook of natural medicine, 4th ed., (pp. 34–60). Churchill Livingstone
Coles, L. B. (1848). Philosophy of health; or health without medicine: A treatise on the laws of the human system. William D. Ticknor & Company
Colp, J. R. (1981). Charles Darwin, Dr. Edward Lane, and the ‘Singular Trial’ of Robinson v. Robinson and Lane. Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, 36(2), 205–213
Combe, A. (1834). The principles of physiology applied to the preservation of health, and to the improvement of physical and mental education. Black
Combe, G. (1850). The life and correspondence of Andrew Combe. Maclachlan and Stewart
Cooter, R. (1984). The cultural meaning of popular science: Phrenology and the organization of consent in nineteenth-century Britain. Cambridge University Press
Crook, T. (2006). Schools for the moral training of the people: Public baths, liberalism and the promotion of cleanliness in Victorian Britain. European Review of History: Revue Européenne d’Histoire, 13(1), 21–47
Crook, T. (2016). Governing systems: Modernity and the making of public health in England, 1830–1910. University of California Press
Cunningham, H. (1980). Leisure in the Industrial Revolution, C.1780-C.1880. Croom Helm
Flynn, P. A. R. (1980). The healing continuum: Journeys in the philosophy of holistic health. R. J. Brady Company
Forward, C. W. (1898). Fifty years of food reform: A history of the vegetarian movement in England. Ideal Pub. Union
Goodman, J. (1845). Hydropathy or the philosophy of bathing (Hydropathic Series Vol.3). William Horsel
Gordon, J. S. (1980). The paradigm of holistic medicine. In A. C. Hastings, J. Fadiman, & J. S. Gordon (Eds.), Health for the whole person, (pp. 3–25). Westview Press
Haley, B. (1978). The healthy body and Victorian culture. Harvard University Press
Hall, L. (2004). Hauling down the double standard: Feminism, social purity and sexual science in late nineteenth-century Britain. Gender & History, 16(1), 36–56
Hamlin, C. (1994). State medicine in Great Britain. In D. Porter (Ed.), The history of public health and the modern state, (pp.132–164). Rodopi
Hamlin, C. (1998). Public health and social justice in the age of Chadwick: Britain, 1800–1854. Cambridge University Press
Harrison, J. P. (1875). Sanitary measures. British Almanac of the Society for the Diffusion of Useful Knowledge, 48, 111–132
Hooker, L. C. (2005). Hygiene. In M. C. Horowitz (Ed.), New dictionary of the history of ideas, (pp. 1064–1068). Charles Scribner’s Sons
Jewson, N. D. (1976). The disappearance of the sick-man from medical cosmology. Sociology, 10, 1770–1870
Kelley, V. (2010). Soap and water: Cleanliness, dirt and the working classes in Victorian and Edwardian Britain. I. B. Tauris
Kerr, M. N. (2017). Contagion, isolation, and biopolitics in Victorian London. Springer
Lane, E. W. (1859). Hydropathy: Or, hygienic medicine. John Churchill
Lane, E. W. (1863). Hydropathy, or hygienic medicine. In Chambers’s encyclopaedia, Vol.5, (pp. 486–489). W. and R. Chambers
Lane, E. W. (1874). What is disease? The Medical Press and Circular, 68, 543–544
Lane, E. W. (1875). What is medicine? The Medical Press and Circular, 70, 6–7
Lane, E. W. (1885). Hygienic medicine: The teachings of physiology and common-sense. J. & A. Churchill
LaPatra, J., W (1978). Healing: The coming revolution in holistic medicine. McGraw-Hill
Lawrence, C., & Weisz, G. (1998). Medical holism: The context. In C. Lawrence, & G. Weisz (Eds.), Greater than the parts: Holism in biomedicine, 1920–1950, (pp. 1–22). Oxford University Press
Lewes, G. H. (1859). The physiology of common life, 1859 vol., (p. 78). W. Blackwood
Lobb, H. W. M. (1855). Hygiene: Or, the hand-book of health. Simpkin, Marshall, and Co
Maretzki, T. W., & Seidler, E. (1985). Biomedicine and naturopathic healing in West Germany: A historical and ethnomedical view of a stormy relationship. Culture Medicine and Psychiatry, 9(4), 383–421
Metcalfe, R. (1906). The rise and progress of hydropathy in England and Scotland. Simpkin, Marshall, Hamilton, Kent & Co
O’Connor, W. J. (1988). Founders of British physiology: A biographical dictionary, 1820-1885. Manchester University Press
Parker, C. (2000). Improving the ‘condition’ of the people: The health of Britain and the provision of public baths 1840–1870. Sports Historian, 20(2), 24–42
Parkes, E. A. (1864). A manual of practical hygiene: Prepared especially for use in the medical service of the army. John Churchill & Sons
Parkes, L. C. (1889). Hygiene and public health. H. K. Lewis
Pickford, J. H. (1858). Hygiene or health as depending upon the conditions of the atmosphere, foods and drinks, motion and rest, sleep and wakefulness. John Churchill
Pickstone, J. V. (2006). Medicine, society and the state. In R. Porter (Ed.), The Cambridge history of medicine, (pp. 260–297). Cambridge University Press
Porter, D. (1994). The history of public health and the modern state. Rodopi
Price, R. (1981). Hydropathy in England 1840–70. Medical History, 25(3), 269–280
Regenmortel, M. V., & Hull, D. L. (2002). Promises and limits of reductionism in the biomedical sciences. John Wiley & Sons
Richardson, B. W. (1876). Hygeia: A city of health. Macmillan
Rosenberg, C. E. (Ed.). (2003). Right living: An Anglo-American tradition of self-help medicine and hygiene. Johns Hopkins University Press
Sato, T. (1978). E. W. Lane’s hydropathic establishment at Moor Park. Hitotsubashi Journal of Social Studies, 10(1), 45–59
Scott, A. L. (1999a). Physical purity feminism and state medicine in late nineteenth-century England. Women’s History Review, 8(4), 625–653
Scott, C. J. (1999b). The life and trials of Tr Allinson Ex-Lrcp Ed. 1858–1918. Proceedings of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh, 29(3), 258–261
Scott, C. J. (2010). Gandhi and the ‘struck-off’ doctor, Thomas Richard Allinson (1858–1918). Journal of Medical Biography, 18(3), 133–137
Sheard, S. (2000). Profit is a dirty word: The development of public baths and wash-houses in Britain 1847–1915. Social History of Medicine, 13(1), 63–86
Sheard, S., & Power, H. (2017). Body and city: Histories of urban public health. Routledge
Shifrin, M. (2015). Victorian Turkish baths. Swindon. Historic England
Sigerist, H. E. (1933). The philosophy of hygiene. Bulletin of the Institute of the History of Medicine, 1, 323–331
Sigerist, H. E. (1956). Landmarks in the history of hygiene. Oxford University Press
Simon, J. (1890). English sanitary institutions reviewed in their course of development and in some of their political and social relations. Limited: Cassell & Company
Smiles, S. (1838). Physical education: or, the nurture and management of children, founded on the study of their nature and constitution. Oliver & Boyd
Smiles, S. (1859). Self-help; with illustrations of character and conduct. John Murray
Smith, V. (1987). Physical puritanism and sanitary science: Material and immaterial beliefs in popular physiology, 1650–1840. In R. Porter, & W. F. Bynum (Eds.), Medical fringe & medical orthodoxy, (pp. 174–197). Croom Helm
Smith, V. (2007). Clean: A history of personal hygiene and purity. Oxford University Press
Smuts, J. C. (1926). Holism and evolution. Macmillan
Spalding, F. (2001). Gwen Raverat: Friends, family and affections. Harvill Press
Thomson, E. (2001). Physiology, hygiene and the entry of women to the medical profession in Edinburgh C. 1869–C. 1900. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C, 32(1), 105–126
Timmermann, C. (2001). Constitutional medicine, neoromanticism, and the politics of antimechanism in interwar Germany. Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 75(4), 717–739
Trall, R. T. (1851). The hydropathic encyclopedia: A system of hydropathy and hygiene, in eight parts (1 vol.). Fowler and Wells
Trall, R. T. (1864). Handbook of hygienic practice. Miller & Wood
Travers, T. H. E. (1977). Samuel Smiles and the origins of ‘self-help’: Reform and the new enlightenment. A Quarterly Journal Concerned with British Studies, 9(2), 161–187
Ward, S. H. (1853). The science of health. Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge
Warner, J. H. (1977). ‘The nature-trusting heresy’: American physicians and the concept of the healing power of nature in the 1850’s and 1860’s. Perspectives in American History, 11, 291–324
Wear, A. (1993). The history of personal hygiene. In W. F. Bynum & R. Porter (Eds.), Companion encyclopedia of the history of medicine, (pp.1283–1308). Routledge
Weatherall, M. W. (1996). Making medicine scientific: Empiricism, rationality, and quackery in mid-Victorian Britain. Social History of Medicine, 9(2), 175–194
Weisz, G. (2003). The emergence of medical specialization in the nineteenth century. Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 77(3), 536–575
Weisz, G. (2005). Divide and conquer: A comparative history of medical specialization. Oxford University Press
Whorton, J. C. (2000). Inner hygiene: Constipation and the pursuit of health in modern society. Oxford University Press
Whorton, J. C. (2002). Nature cures: The history of alternative medicine in America. Oxford University Press
Wohl, A. S. (1983). Endangered lives: Public health in Victorian Britain. Harvard University Press
Worboys, M. (2011). Practice and the science of medicine in the nineteenth century. Isis, 102(1), 109–115
Funding
Not applicable
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest/competing interests
Not applicable
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Bae, M. Locating hygienic medicine within the intellectual history of hygiene: cases of E. W. Lane and T. R. Allinson. HPLS 44, 51 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-022-00529-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-022-00529-4