Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T04:11:57.394Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Five Theses on Instrumental Realism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2023

Davis Baird*
Affiliation:
University of South Carolina

Extract

Some may find an oxymoron in my title. But, my use of “instrumental” is to focus attention on the real instruments of science-pumps, dynamos and cyclotrons-and not the view that scientific theories are best understood as instruments. In what follows I characterize and argue for a kind of realism strongly wedded to what we do with scientific instruments, and divorced from what our theories may say about the entities manipulated by these instruments. My discussion owes much to Ian Hacking’s “Experimental Argument for Realism” (Hacking 1983, ch. 16).

The following fantasy might help give some idea of the view I am interested in. Suppose that the diskettes, which many people use in conjunction with a small computer, do not store information magnetically; in fact they store it “radioactively,” exactly how, is not relevant. IBM decided that many people in their target personal computer market would be put off by “nuclear diskettes.”

Type
Part VI. Realism
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baird, D. (1988). “Instruments on the Cusp of Science and Technology: The Indicator Diagram.” Knowledge and Society. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Baird, D. and Faust, T. (1988). “Scientific Instruments, Scientific Progress and the Cyclotron.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Conant, J.B. and Nash, L.K. eds. (1957). Harvard Case Studies in Experimental Science, Volume 1. Cambridge, Ma: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. and Hofstadter, D. eds. (1981). The Mind’s I. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian. (1983). Representing and Intervening. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, E.O. (1951). “The Evolution of the Cyclotron.” Nobel Lecture, December 11, 1951. In Nobel Lectures. 1965. Nobel Lectures for Physics: 1922-1941. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Livingston, M.S. (1969). Particle Accelerators: A Brief History. Cambridge, Ma: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMillan, E.M. (1959). “Particle Accelerators.Experimental Nuclear Physics, Volume III. Edited by Segre, E.. Pages 639785. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Moore, J.H., Davis, C.C. and Coplan, M.A. (1983). Building Scientific Apparatus: A Practical Guide to Design and Construction. London: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Advanced Book Program/World Science Division.Google Scholar
Muirhead, J.P. (1859). The Life of James Watt with Selections from his Correspondence. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. (1979). “The Meaning of ‘Meaning’.” Reprinted in Mind, Language and Reality: Philosophical Papers, Volume 2. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Searle, J. (1980). “Minds, Brains and Progress.” The Behavioral and Brain Sciences. Reprinted in Dennett and Hofstader, 1981. Page references are to that volume.Google Scholar
Turing, A. (1950). “Computing Machinery and Intelligence.” Mind. Reprinted in Dennett and Hofstadter, 1981. Page references are to that volume.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wideroe, R. (1928). “Ueber ein Neues Princip zur Herstellung hohen Spannugen [New Principle in Generating High Voltages].Archive Elektrotechische. Volume 21, pages 387406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R.R. (1941). “A Vacuum-Tight Sliding Seal.Review of Scientific Instruments. Volume 12, pages 91-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winograd, T. (1973). Understanding Natural Language. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar