Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T15:10:54.845Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mothering, Diversity, and Peace Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Alison Bailey
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The most popular uniting theme in feminist peace literature grounds women's peace work in mothering. I argue if maternal arguments do not address the variety of relationships different races and classes of mothers have to institutional violence and/or the military, then the resulting peace politics can only draw incomplete conclusions about the relationships between maternal work/thinking and peace. To illustrate this I compare two models of mothering: Sara Ruddick's decription of “maternal practice” and Patricia Hill Collins's account of racial-ethnic women's “motherwork.”

Type
REVIEW ESSAY
Information
Hypatia , Volume 9 , Issue 2: Special Issue: Feminism and Peace , Spring 1994 , pp. 188 - 198
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brown, Willmette. 1981. Black women and the peace movement. London: Falling Wall Press.Google Scholar
Bordo, Susan. 1989. The view from nowhere and the dream of everywhere. American Philosophical Association Newsletter on Feminism and Philosophy (March): 19–24.Google Scholar
Chandler, Zala. 1989. Antiracism, antisexism, and peace (Sapphire's perspective). In Rocking the ship of state: Towards a feminist peace politics, ed.Harris, Adrienne and King, Ynestra. Boulder, CO.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Collins, Patricia Hill. 1990. Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness and the politics of empowerment. Boston: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Collins, Patricia Hill. 1992. Shifting the center: Race, class and feminist theorizing about motherhood. Unpublished paper.Google Scholar
Hartsock, Nancy. 1983. The feminist standpoint: Developing the ground for a specifically feminist historical materialism. In Discovering reality: Feminist perspectives of episte‐ mology, metaphysics, methodology, and philosophy of science, ed.Harding, Sandra and Hintikka, Merrill B.Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing.Google Scholar
Hooks, Bell. 1984. Feminist theory from margin to center. Boston: South End Press.Google Scholar
Hooks, Bell. 1989. Talking back: Thinking feminist, thinking faiack. Boston: South End Press.Google Scholar
Hurtado, Aida, et al. 1989. Relating to privilege: seduction and rejection in the subordination of white women and women of color. Signs: Journal of Women in Cuture and Society 14(4): 833–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maclntyre, Alasdair. 1981. After virtue. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Omolade, Barbara. 1989. We speak for the planet. In Rocking the ship of state: Towards a feminist peace politics, ed.Harris, Adrienne and King, Ynestra. Boulder, CO.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Petersen, Susan Rae. 1983. Against parenting. In Mothering: essays in feminist theory, ed.Trebilcot, Joyce. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allenheld.Google Scholar
Ruddick, Sara. 1980. Maternal thinking. Feminist Studies 6(3): 213–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruddick, Sara. 1985. Maternal thinking and the practice of peace. Journal of Peace Education 167:97–112.10.1177/002205748516700307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruddick, Sara. 1989. Maternal thinking: Toward a politics of peace. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Spelman, Elizabeth V. 1988. The inessential woman: Problems of exclusion in feminist thought. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludvvig. 1968. Philosophical investigations, ed.Anscombe, G. E. M.New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Zinn, Maxine Baca, Weber Cannon, Lynn, Higganbotham, Elizabeth, and Dill, Bonnie Thornton. The costs of exclusionary practices in women's studies. Signs: Journal of Women in Cuture and Society 11(2): 290–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar