Hostname: page-component-6b989bf9dc-6f5p8 Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-04-14T20:26:13.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pilgrim’s Progress

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Annette C. Baier*
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA15260, U.S.A.

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Gauthier, DavidDavid Hume: Contractarian,’ Philosophical Review 88 (1979) 3-38CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Gauthier, David The Logic of Leviathan: The Moral and Political Theory of Thomas Hobbes (Oxford: Clarendon Press 1969)Google Scholar; and ‘Thomas Hobbes: Moral Theorist,’ Journal of Philosophy 76 (1979) 547-59

3 Gauthier, DavidThe Politics of Redemption?,’ in MacAdam, J. Neumann, M. and Lafrance, G. eds., Trent Rousseau Papers, Revue de 1’Universite d’Ottawa 49 (1980) 329-56Google Scholar

4 David, GauthierThe Unity of Reason: A Subversive Reinterpretation of Kant,’ Ethics 96 (1985) 74-88Google Scholar

5 de Tocqueville, Alexis Democracy in America (New York: The Colonial Press 1899)Google Scholar Book II, Chapter II

6 For then the second part of Gauthier’s test for basic endowment will not be met. One’s body, ‘used’ by one when one is alive and ‘present,’ is also usable by others once one is ‘absent’ in the way the dead are absent. (This note was added after reading Gauthier’s reply.)

7 ‘Donna e mobile … ?’ For further evidence see Rosenthal, R. Hall, J .A. DiMatteo, M.R. Rogers, P.L. Archer, D. Sensitivity to Nonverbal Communication: The PONS Test (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press 1979)Google Scholar.

8 Here we should return to David, GauthierThe Social Contract as Ideology,’ Philosophy and Public Affairs 6 (1977) 130-64Google Scholar.