Abstract
An overview is provided of how the concept of a scientific model has devel-oped and changed in the philosophy of science in the course of this Century. I identify three shifts of interest in the treatment of the topic of scientific models. First, only from the 1950s did models begin to be considered relevant to the scientific enterprise, motivated by the desire to account for issues such as theory change and creativity in scientific discovery. Second, I examine how philosophers then increasingly concentrated on the analysis of the functions of models, e.g. for explanation or for guiding and suggesting new experiments. Finally, I show how an analysis of the functions of models could lead to the consideration of their function not just within science, but also in human cognition, so that models are now sometimes viewed as tools of actual (rather than logically reconstructed) scientific thinking.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Achinstein, P., 1964, Models, analogies, and theories, Philosophy of Science 31:328–350.
Achinstein, P., 1965, Theoretical models, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 16:102–120.
Achinstein, P., 1968, Concepts of Science, John Hopkins Press, Baltimore/Maryland.
Apostel, L., 1961, Towards the formal study of models in the non-formal sciences, in: The Concept and the Role of the Models in Mathematics and Natural and Social Sciences, H. Freudenthal, ed., Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 1–37.
Bailer-Jones, D.M., 1997, Scientific models: a cognitive approach with an application in astrophysics, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Cambridge (unpublished).
Black, M., 1962, Models and Metaphors, Cornell University Press, Ithaca/New York.
Braithwaite, R., [1953] 1968, Scientific Explanation. A Study of the Function of Theory,Probability and Law in Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Braithwaite, R., 1954, The nature of theoretical concepts and the role of models in an advanced science, Revue Internationale de Philosophie 8/1–2:34–40.
Carnap, R., 1939, Foundations of logic and mathematics, International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, Chicago University Press, Chicago.
Carnap, R., [1966] 1995,An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science, M. Gardner, ed., Dover Publications Inc., New York.
Darden, D., ed., 1997, PSA 1996, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing/Michigan.
de Kleer, J., and Brown, J. S., 1981, Mental models of physical mechanisms and their acqui-sition, in: Cognitive Skills and Their Acquisition, J.R. Anderson, ed., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale/New Jersey, pp. 285–309.
de Kleer, J., and Brown, J.S., 1983, Assumptions and ambiguities in mechanistic mental models, in: Mental Models, D. Gentner and A.L. Stevens, eds., Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 155–190.
Duhem, P., 1954 [translated from the French 2nd edition, 1914], The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory, Princeton University Press, Princeton/New Jersey.
Freudenthal, H., ed., 1961, The Concept and the Role of the Models in Mathematics and Natural and Social Sciences, Reidel, Dordrecht.
Gentner, D., 1982, Are scientific analogies metaphors?, in: Metaphor: Problems and Perspectives, D.S. Miall, ed., Harvester Press, Brighton, pp.106–132.
Gentner, D. 1983. Structure mapping: a theoretical framework for analogy, Cognitive Science 7:155–170.
Gentner, D., and Gentner, D., 1983, Flowing waters and teeming crowds: mental models of electricity, in: Mental Models, D. Gentner and A.L. Stevens, eds., Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J., pp. 99–129.
Gentner, D., and Markman, A.B., 1997, Structure mapping in analogy and similarity, American Psychologist 52:45–56.
Gentner, D., and Stevens, A.L., eds., 1983, Mental Models, Erlbaum, Hillsdale. N.J.
Giere, R., 1988, Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Giere, R., 1996, From wissenschaftliche Philosophie to philosophy of science, in: Origins of Logical Empiricism, R. Giere and A. Richardson, eds., Minnesota Studies in the Philoso-phy of Science, Vol. XVI, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN, pp. 335–354.
Halloun, I.A., and Hestenes, D., 1987, Modeling instruction in mechanics, American Journal of Physics 55:455–462.
Hanson, N.R., 1958, Patterns of Discovery, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Harré, R., 1960, Metaphor, model and mechanism, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 60:101–122.
Harré, R., 1970, The Principles of Scientific Thinking, Macmillian, London.
Harré, R., 1988, Where models and analogies really count, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 2:118–133.
Herfel, W.E., Krajewski, W., Niiniluoto, I., and Wojcicki, R., eds., 1995, Theories and Models in Scientific Processes,Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities, Rodopi, Amsterdam, pp. 137–149.
Hesse, M., 1953, Models in physics, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 4:198–214.
Hesse, M., 1966, Models and Analogies in Science, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame/Indiana.
Holyoak, K.J., and Thagard, P., 1997, The analogical mind, American Psychologist 52:35–44.
Hutten, E.H., 1954, The role of models in physics, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 4:284–301.
Hutten, E.H., 1956, The Language of Modern Physics, George Allen & Unwin Ltd., London.
Kuhn, T.S., 1962, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions,University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Kuhn, T.S., 1977, Second thoughts on paradigms, in: The Essential Tension, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 293–319.
Morrison, M. and Morgan, M., eds., 1999, Models as Mediators, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, in press.
Nersessian, N.J., 1993, In the theoretician’s laboratory: thought experimenting as mental modeling, in: PSA 1992, D. Hull, M. Forbes and K. Okruhlik, eds., Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, MI, pp. 291–301.
Reichenbach, H., 1938, Experience and Prediction, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Salmon, W., 1993, The value of scientific understanding, Philosophica 51:9–19.
Sellars, W., [1956] 1997, Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind, Harvard University Press, Cambridge/Mass.
Suppes, P., 1961, A comparison of the meaning and uses of models in mathematics and the empirical sciences, in: The Concept and the Role of the Model in Mathematics and Natural and Social Sciences, H. Freudenthal, ed., Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 163–177.
van Fraassen, B., 1980, The Scientific Image, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Wells, M., Hestenes, D., and Swackhamer, G. 1995. A modeling method for high school physics instruction, American Journal of Physics 63:606–619.
Williams, M.D., Hollan, J.D., and Stevens, A., 1983, Human reasoning about a simple physical system, in: Mental Models, D. Gentner and A.L. Stevens, eds., Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J., pp. 131–153.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bailer-Jones, D.M. (1999). Tracing the Development of Models in the Philosophy of Science. In: Magnani, L., Nersessian, N.J., Thagard, P. (eds) Model-Based Reasoning in Scientific Discovery. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4813-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4813-3_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7181-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-4813-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive