Skip to main content
Log in

Social being and the human essence: An unresolved issue in Soviet philosophy

A dialogue with Russian philosophers conducted by David Bakhurst

  • Published:
Studies in East European Thought Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This is a transcription of a debate on the concept of a person conducted in Moscow in 1983. David Bakhurst argues that Evald Ilyenkov's social constructivist conception of personhood, founded on Marx's thesis that the human essence is ‘the ensemble of social relations’, is either false or trivially true. F. T. Mikhailov, V. S. Bibler, V. A. Lektorsky and V. V. Davydov critically assess Bakhurst's arguments, elucidate and contextualize Ilyenkov's views, and defend, in contrasting ways, the claim that human individuals are socially constituted beings. Issues discussed include: the concepts of activity (dejatel'nost') and community (obščenija) and their relevance to the notions of mind and personhood; self-consciousness and its relation to personal identity; naturalism in Soviet thought. Translated from the Russian.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

DOCUMENTS FROM THE HISTORY OF SOVIET THOUGHT

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bakhurst, D. Social being and the human essence: An unresolved issue in Soviet philosophy. Stud East Eur Thought 47, 3–60 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01075140

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01075140

Key words

Navigation