Skip to main content
Log in

A universal scale of comparison

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Linguistics and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Comparative constructions form two classes, those that permit direct comparisons (comparisons of measurements as in Seymour is taller than he is wide) and those that only allow indirect comparisons (comparisons of relative positions on separate scales as in Esme is more beautiful than Einstein is intelligent). In contrast with other semantic theories, this paper proposes that the interpretation of the comparative morpheme remains the same whether it appears in sentences that compare individuals directly or indirectly. To develop a unified account, I suggest that all comparisons (whether in terms of height, intelligence or beauty) involve a scale of universal degrees that are isomorphic to the rational (fractional) numbers between 0 and 1. Crucial to a unified treatment, the connection between the individuals being compared and universal degrees involves two steps. First individuals are mapped to a value on a primary scale that ranks individuals with respect to the gradable property (whether it be height, beauty or intelligence). Second, the value on the primary scale is mapped to a universal degree that encodes the value’s relative position on the primary scale. Direct comparison results if measurements such as seven feet participate in the primary scale (as in Seven feet is tall). Otherwise the result is an indirect comparison.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bach E. (1986). Natural language metaphysics. In: Barcan Marcus, R., Dor, G.J.W. and Weingartner, P. (eds) Logic, methodology and philosophy of science VII, pp 573–595. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bale, A. C. (2006). The universal scale and the semantics of comparison. Ph.D. Thesis, McGill University (www.alanbale.com).

  • Bartsch R. and Vennemann T. (1972). Semantic structures: A study in the relation between semantics and syntax. Frankfurt am Main, Athenaum

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell J.L. and Alan B.S. (1969). Models and ultraproducts: An introduction. North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell J.L. and Machover M. (1977). A course in mathematical logic. North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierwisch M. (1987). Semantik der Graduierrung. In: Bierwisch, M. and Lang, E. (eds) Grammatische und Konseptuelle Aspekete von Dimensionsadjektiven, pp 91–286. Akademie Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnan J. (1973). Syntax of the comparative clause construction in English. Linguistic Inquiry 4(3): 275–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnan J. (1975). Comparative deletion and constraints on transformations. Linguistic Analysis 1(1): 25–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell M.J. (1976). The semantics of degree. In: Partee, B. (eds) Montague grammar, pp 261–292. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Embick D. (2007). Blocking effects and analytic/synthetic alternations. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25(1): 1–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox D. and Hackl M. (2006). The universal density of measurement. Linguistics and Philosophy 29(5): 537–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellan L. (1981). Towards an integrated theory of comparatives. Narr, Tubingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy C. (1999). Projecting the adjective: The syntax and semantics of gradability and comparison. Garland, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy C. and McNally L. (2005). Scale structure and the semantic typology of gradable predicates. Language 81: 345–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, E. (1980). A semantics for positive and comparative deletion. Linguistics and Philosophy, 4(1), 1–46, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein E. (1982). The interpretation of adjectival comparatives. Journal of Linguistics 18: 113–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein E. (1991). Comparatives. In: von Stechow A., Wunderlich, D. (eds) Semantik/semantics: An international handbook of contemporary research, pp 673–691. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Krantz D.H., Luce R.D. and Tversky A. (1971). Foundations of measurement. Academic Press, New York, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Landman F. (1991). Structures for semantics. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Landman F. (2004). Indefinites and the type of sets. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludlow P. (1989). Implicit comparison classes. Journal of Linguistics 12: 519–533

    Google Scholar 

  • McCawley, J. D. (1976). Quantitative and qualitative comparison in English. In Grammar and meaning (pp. 1–14). New York: Academic Press.

  • Nakanishi, K. (2003). Semantics of measure phrases. In M. Kadowaki & S. Kawahara (Eds.), The Proceedings of the 33rd Conference of the North East Linguistic Society (pp. 225–244).

  • Schwarzschild R. (2002). The grammar of measurement. In: Jackson, B. (eds) Proceedings of SALT XII. CLC Publications, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Seuren P.A.M. (1973). The comparative. In: Kiefer, F. and Ruwet, N. (eds) Generative grammar in Europe, pp 528–564. D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • von Stechow A. (1984). Comparing semantic theories of comparison. Journal of Semantics 3: 1–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler III, S.C. (1972). Attributives and their modifiers. Nous 6(4): 310–334

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alan Clinton Bale.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bale, A.C. A universal scale of comparison. Linguist and Philos 31, 1–55 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-008-9028-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-008-9028-z

Keywords

Navigation