Abstract
Laudan's thesis that conceptual problem solving is at least as important as empirical problem solving in scientific research is given support by a study of the relation between the chromosome theory and the Mendelian research program. It will be shown that there existed a conceptual tension between the chromosome theory and the Mendelian program. This tension was to be resolved by changing the constraints of the Mendelian program. The relation between the chromosome theory and the Mendelian program is shown to be a good illustration of the influence of science itself on the rational standards governing scientific development.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen, G. E.: 1968, ‘Thimas Hunt Morgan and the Problem of Natural Selection’, Journal of the History of Bilogy 1, 113–140.
Allen, G. E.: 1975, Life Science in the Twentieth Century, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
Allen, G. E.: 1980, ‘The Evolutionary Synthesis: Morgan and Natural Selection Revisited’, in E. Mayr and W. B. Provine (eds.), The Evolutionary Synthesis, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 356–382.
Bateson, W.: 1894, Materials for the Study of Variation, London.
Bateson, W.: 1897, ‘Progress in the Study of Variations, I’, in R. C. Punnett (ed.), Papers of William Bateson, Cambridge, 1928.
Bateson, W.: 1898, ‘Progress in the Study of Variations, II’, in R. C. Punnett (ed.), Papers of William Bateson, Cambridge, 1928.
Bateson, W.: 1902, Mendel's Principles of Hereditary: A Defense, Cambridge.
Bateson, W.: 1909, ‘Heredity and Variation in Modern Lights’, in B. Bateson (ed.), William Bateson F. R. S.; Naturalist. His Essays and Addresses with a Short Account of his Life, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1928.
Bateson, W.: 1907, ‘Facts Limiting the Theory of Heredity’, in R. C. Punnett (ed.), Scientific Papers of William Bateson, Cmabridge, 1928.
Baxter, A. L.: 1976, ‘Edmund B. Wilson as a Preformationist: Some Reasons for his Acceptance of the Chromosome Theory’, Journal of the History of Biology 9, 29–57.
Boon, L.: 1983, De List der Wetenchap, Ambo, Baarn.
Brush, S.: 1978, ‘Nettie M. Stevens and the Discovery of Sex Determination by Chromosomes’, Isis 69, 163–172.
Carlson, E. A.: 1966, The Gene: A Critical History, Saunders, Philadelphia and London.
Carlson, E. A.: 1974, ‘The Drosophila Group: The Transformation from the Mendelian Unit to the Individual Gene’, Journal of the History of Biology 7, 31–48.
Coleman, W.: 1970, ‘Bateson and Chromosomes: Conservative Thought in Science’, Centaurus 15, 228–314.
Darden, L.: 1976, ‘Reasoning in Scientific Change: Charles Darwin, Hugo de Vries and the Discovery of Segregation’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 7, 127–169.
Darden, L.: 1977, ‘William Bateson and the Promise of Mendelism’, Journal of the History of Biology 10, 87–106.
Darden, L.: 1980, ‘Theory Construction in Genetics’, in T. Nickels (ed.), Scientific Discovery: Case Studies, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 151–170.
Darden, L. and Maull, N.: 1977, ‘Interfield Theories’, Philosophy of Science 44, 43–64.
Dunn, L. C.: 1965, A Short History of Genetics, McGraw Hill, New York.
East, E. M.: 1910a, ‘The Role of Selection in Plantbreeding’, Popular Science Monthly 77, 190–203.
East, E. M.: 1910b, ‘A Mendelian Interpretation of Variation that is Apparently Continuous’, American Naturalist 44, 65–82.
Frankel, H.: 1979, ‘The Reception and Acceptance of Continental Drift Theory as a Rational Episode in the History of Science’, in S. H. Mauskopf (ed.), The Reception of Unconventional Science, Westview Press, Boulder, pp. 51–89.
Jennings, H. S.: 1910, ‘Experimental Evidence on the Effectiveness of Selection’, American Naturalist 44, 136–145.
Johannsen, W.: 1907, ‘Does Hybridization Increase Fluctuating Variability?’, Report on the Third International Conference on Genetics, Spottiswoode, London.
Johannsen, W.: 1909, Elemente der Exalten Erblichkeitslehre, Jena.
Johannsen, W.: 1915, ‘Experimentel Grundlagen der Deszendenzlehre: Variabilität, Vererbung, Kreuzung, Mutation’, Kultur der Gegenwart III, 4, vol. 4, 497–660.
Koestler, A.: 1959, The Sleepwalkers, Grosset and Dunlap, New York.
Laudan, L.: 1977, Progress and its Problems, Routledge, London.
Lock, R. H.: 1906, Recent Progress in the Study of Variation, Heredity and Evolution, Murray, London.
Mayr, E.: 1973, ‘The recent Historiography of Genetics: Essay Review’, Journal of the History of Biology 6, 125–154.
Mayr, E.: 1980, ‘Prologue: Some Thoughts on the History of the Evolutionary Synthesis’, in E. Mayr and W. B. Provine (eds.), The Evolutionary Synthesis, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 1–48.
Mayr, E.: 1982, The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, Evolution and Inheritance, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Morgan, T. H.: 1909, ‘For Darwin’, Popular Science Monthly 70, 367–380.
Muller, H. J.: 1951, ‘The Development of the Gene Theory’, in L. C. Dunn (ed.), Genetics in the Twentieth Century, New York, pp. 77–100.
Nickles, H. J.: 1980, ‘Can Scientific Constraints be Violated Rationally?’, in T. Nickels (ed.), Scientific Discovery, Logic and Rationality, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 285–315.
Nickles, T.: 1981, ‘What is a problem that We may Solve it?’, Synthesis 47, 85–118.
Nilson-Ehle, H.: 1908, ‘Einige Ergebnisse von Kreuzungen bei Hafer und Weizen’, Botaniska Notiser, 257–294.
Pearl, R.: 1917, ‘The Selection Problem’, American Naturalist 51, 65–91.
Pearl, R. and Surface F.: 1909, ‘Is there a Cumulative Effect of Selection?’, Zeitschrift für Induktive Abstammungs und Verebungslehre 2, 257–275.
Provine, W.: 1971, The Origins of Theoretical Population Genetics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Roll-Hansen, N.: 1978a, ‘Drosophila Genetics: A Reductionist Research Program’, Journal of the History of Biology 11, 159–210.
Roll-Hansen, N.: 1978b, ‘The Genotype Theory of Johannsen and its Relation to Plantbreeding and Evolution’, Centaurus 22, 201–235.
Roll-Hansen, N.: 1986, ‘The Crucial Experiment of Wilhelm Johannsen’, Manuscript.
Van Balen, G. A. M.: 1986, ‘The Influence of Johannsen's Discoveries on the Constraint-structure of the Mendelian Research Program’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 17, 175–204.
Wilson, E. B.: 1905, ‘The Problem of Development’, Science 21, 291–294.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
I thank A. A. Derksen, N. Roll-Hansen and the anonymous referees for their helpful comments.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Van Balen, G. Conceptual tensions between theory and program: The chromosome theory and the Mendelian research program. Biol Philos 2, 435–461 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00127700
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00127700