Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T11:54:19.677Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The ⊲-ordering on normal ultrafilters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Stewart Baldwin*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Auburn University, Auburn University, Alabama 36849

Extract

If κ is a measurable cardinal, then it is a well-known fact that there is at least one normal ultrafilter over κ. In [K-1], Kunen showed that one cannot say more without further assumptions, for if U is a normal ultrafilter over κ, then L[U] is an inner model of ZFC in which κ has exactly one normal measure. On the other hand, Kunen and Paris showed [K-P] that if κ is measurable in the ground model, then there is a forcing extension in which κ has normal ultrafilters, so it is consistent that κ has the maximum possible number of normal ultrafilters. Starting with assumptions stronger than measurability, Mitchell [Mi-1] filled in the gap by constructing models of ZFC + GCH satisfying “there are exactly λ normal ultrafilters over κ”, where λ could be κ+ or κ++ (measured in the model), or anything ≤ κ. Whether or not Mitchell's results can be obtained by starting only with a measurable cardinal in the ground model and defining a forcing extension is unknown.

There are substantial differences between the Mitchell models and the Kunen-Paris models. In the Kunen-Paris models κ can be the only measurable cardinal. However, in the Mitchell model in which κ has exactly 2 normal ultrafilters, one of them contains the set {α < κ: α is measurable} while the other does not. Thus it is natural to ask if it is possible to get a model M of ZFC in which κ is the only measurable cardinal and κ has exactly 2 normal ultrafilters. In this paper we will show that, using appropriate large cardinal assumptions, the answer is yes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[J]Jech, Thomas, Set theory, Academic Press, New York, 1978.Google Scholar
[K-M]Kanamori, Akihiro and Magidor, Menachem, The evolution of large cardinals in set theory, Higher set theory (Proceedings, Oberwolfach, 1970), Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 669, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1978, pp. 99275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[K-1]Kunen, Kenneth, Some applications of iterated ultrapowers in set theory, Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 1 (1970), pp. 179227.Google Scholar
[K-2]Kunen, Kenneth, Elementary embeddings and infinitary combinatorics, this Journal, vol. 36 (1971), pp. 407413.Google Scholar
[K-P]Kunen, Kenneth and Paris, Jeffrey, Boolean extension and measurable cardinals, Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 2 (1971), pp. 359378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Me]Menas, Telis, Consistency results concerning supercompactness, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 223 (1976), pp. 6191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Mi-1]Mitchell, William, Sets constructible from sequences of ultrafilters, this Journal, vol. 39 (1974), pp. 5766.Google Scholar
[Mi-2]Mitchell, William, Hypermeasurable cardinals, Logic Colloquium '78 North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1979, pp. 303317.Google Scholar
[S-R-K]Solovay, Robert, Reinhardt, William and Kanamori, Akihiro, Strong axioms of infinity and elementary embeddings, Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 13 (1978), pp. 73116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar