Skip to main content
Log in

Strategic Explanations for the Early Adoption of ISO 14001

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There are two different, and somewhat competing, strategic explanations for why firms certify for ISO 14001. On the one hand, firms may seek to reinforce their present strategies thereby further enhancing their competitive advantage. On the other hand, firms may use ISO 14001 as a mechanism to reorient their strategies, so that a clear signal is sent about the firm's change in strategic positioning. This paper aims to identify the most likely explanation for early adopters of ISO 14001.

Using a matched pair design, we test these alternative explanations on a sample of US firms that certified for ISO 14001 in the first two years after its introduction. In particular, we tested whether ISO 14001 was used to reinforce or reorient firm strategies in respect to the natural environment, corporate social responsibility, quality, and internationalization.

We found that firms that certified early for ISO 14001 had considerable environmental legitimacy and a strong international presence. We also found that the firm's commitment to corporate social responsibility and quality were not significantly different between certified and non-certified firms. These findings suggest that early adopters of ISO 14001 leaned towards reinforcing rather than reorienting their firm strategy, which calls into question the ultimate reach of ISO 14001.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angell, L. C.: 2001, 'Comparing the Environmental and Quality Initiatives of Baldrige Award Winners', Production and Operations Management 10, 276-292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bansal, P. and I. Clelland: forthcoming, 'Talking Trash: Legitimacy, Impression Management and Unsystematic Risk in the Context of the Natural Environment', Academy of Management Journal.

  • Barkema, H. G. and F. Vermeulen: 1998, 'International Expansion through Start-up or Acquisition: A Learning Perspective', Academy of Management Journal 41, 7-26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, C. and P. Webber: 1998, 'ISO Registration: The Process, the Benefits, and the Choice of Registrar', Environmental Quality Management (Winter), 55-64.

  • Deephouse, D. L.: 1996, 'Does Isomorphism Legitimate?', Academy of Management Journal 39, 1024-1039.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delmas, M. A.: 2001, 'Stakeholders and Competitive Advantage: The Case of ISO 14001', Production and Operations Management 10, 343-358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, D.: 1997, 'Cost/Benefit Analysis of ISO 14001 Implementation', GETF http://www. iso14000.net/empire/?SubSystemID=1andComponentID= 15667.

  • Hart, S.: 1995, 'A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm', Academy of Management Journal 37, 986-1014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hymer, S.: 1976, The International Operations of National Firms (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang R. and P. Bansal: 2003, 'Seeing the Need for ISO 14001 Certification', Journal of Management Studies 40, 1047-1067.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostova, T. and S. Zaheer: 1999, 'Organizational Legitimacy Under Conditions of Complexity: The Case of the Multinational Enterprise', Academy of Management Review 24, 64-81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. K., B. R. Agle and D. J. Wood: 1997, 'Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts', Academy of Management Review 22, 853-886.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E.: 1987, 'From Competitive Advantage to Corporate Strategy', Harvard Business Review 65, 43-59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E.: 1990, The Competitive Advantage of Nations (Free Press, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. and C. van der Linde: 1995, 'Green and Competitive: Ending the Stalemate', Harvard Business Review 73, 120-134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. W. and P. J. DiMaggio (eds.): 1991, The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ralborn, C. A., B. E. Joyner and J. W. Logan: 1999, 'ISO 14000 and the Bottom Line', Quality Progress 32, 89-93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, K.: 1995, 'Managing International Interdependence: CEO Characteristics in a Resource-based Framework', Academy of Management Journal 38, 200-231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russo, M. V. and P. A. Fouts: 1997, 'A Resource-based Perspective on Corporate Environmental Performance and Profitability', Academy of Management Journal 40, 534-559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrivastava, P.: 1995, 'Environmental Technologies and Competitive Advantage', Strategic Management Journal 16, 183-200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, M. G.: 1995, 'Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches', Academy of Management Review 20, 571-610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turban, D. B. and D. W. Greening: 1997, 'Corporate Social Performance and Organizational Attractiveness to Perspective Employees', Academy of Management Journal 40, 658-672.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. J.: 1991, 'Corporate Social Performance Revisited', Academy of Management Review 16, 691-718.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer, S.: 1995, 'Overcoming the Liability of Foreignness', Academy of Management Journal 38, 341-363.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bansal, P., Hunter, T. Strategic Explanations for the Early Adoption of ISO 14001. Journal of Business Ethics 46, 289–299 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025536731830

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025536731830

Navigation