Skip to main content
Log in

Allen Carlson and Sheila Lintott (eds): Nature, Aesthetics, and Environmentalism: From Beauty to Duty

Columbia University Press, New York, 2008

  • Book Review
  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Notes

  1. For example, Joan Iverson Nassauer begins her essay with the pronouncement, “We should construct a kind of cultural necessity to underpin ecological health across the landscape, as if there were no other choice” (2008: p 363; italics added). Stan Godlovitch has a similar view of the goal of environmental aesthetics: “For an aesthetic appeal to work, an argument must be mounted that identifies in nature that which overridingly commands our regard” (2008: p 133; italics added).

  2. In particular, the authors’ characterization of Christian attitudes toward nature echoes the influential but much disputed views of White (1967) and Nash (2001 [1967]).

  3. Moreover, in the fourth and final section of the volume, where aesthetic sophistication is supposed to translate into an invigorated environmental ethic, the pay-off seems slight. Aside from Joan Iverson Nassauer’s interesting discussion of urban landscapes (2008), a discussion that, not incidentally, diverges from the volume’s overwhelming emphasis on wilderness preservation, I could not find any instances where the aesthetic perspective enhances understanding of a complex issue. This reinforces the impression that the purpose of environmental aesthetics is not to illuminate but to motivate.

References

  • Botkin, D. (1990). Discordant harmonies: A new ecology for the twenty-first century. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budd, M. (2008). The aesthetics of nature. In A. Carlson & S. Lintott (Eds.), Nature, aesthetics, and environmentalism: From beauty to duty (pp. 286–301). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callicott, J. B. (2008). Leopold’s land aesthetic. In A. Carlson & S. Lintott (Eds.), Nature, aesthetics, and environmentalism: From beauty to duty (pp. 105–118). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callicott, J. B., & Nelson, M. (Eds.). (1998). The great new wilderness debate. Athens: University of Georgia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, A. (2008). Aesthetic appreciation of the natural environment. In A. Carlson & S. Lintott (Eds.), Nature, aesthetics, and environmentalism: From beauty to duty (pp. 119–132). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, A., & Lintott, S. (Eds.). (2008). Nature, aesthetics, and environmentalism: From beauty to duty. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chenu, M. -D. (1997). Nature, man, and society in the twelfth century: Essays on new theological perspectives in the latin west (J. Taylor & L. K. Little, ed. and trans.). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

  • Coates, P. (1998). Nature: Western attitudes since ancient times. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronon, W. (1995). The trouble with wilderness; or, getting back to the wrong nature. In W. Cronon (Ed.), Uncommon ground: Toward reinventing nature (pp. 69–90). New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godlovitch, S. (2008). Icebreakers: Environmentalism and natural aesthetics. In A. Carlson & S. Lintott (Eds.), Nature, aesthetics, and environmentalism: From beauty to duty (pp. 133–150). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargrove, E. C. (2008). The historical foundations of American environmental attitudes. In A. Carlson & S. Lintott (Eds.), Nature, aesthetics, and environmentalism: From beauty to duty (pp. 29–48). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hettinger, N. (2008). Objectivity in environmental aesthetics and protection of the environment. In A. Carlson & S. Lintott (Eds.), Nature, aesthetics, and environmentalism: From beauty to duty (pp. 413–437). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, W. R. (2003). The Sunflower forest: Ecological restoration and the new communion with nature. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, R. W. B. (1955). The American Adam: Innocence, tragedy, and tradition in the nineteenth century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, M. (Ed.). (2007). American wilderness: A new history. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Lintott, S. (2008). Toward ecofriendly aesthetics. In A. Carlson & S. Lintott (Eds.), Nature, aesthetics, and environmentalism: From beauty to duty (pp. 380–396). New York: Columbia University Press.

  • Matthews, P. (2008). Scientific knowledge and the aesthetic appreciation of nature. In A. Carlson & S. Lintott (Eds.), Nature, aesthetics, and environmentalism: From beauty to duty (pp. 188–204). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, A. (1992). Nature and man in the middle ages. In J. Torrance (Ed.), The concept of nature (pp. 25–62). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, R. (2001). Wilderness and the American mind, 4th ed. New Haven: Yale University Press (First Edition, 1967).

  • Nassauer, J. I. (2008). Cultural sustainability: Aligning aesthetics and ecology. In A. Carlson & S. Lintott (Eds.), Nature, aesthetics, and environmentalism: From beauty to duty (pp. 363–379). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neville, R. C. (1987). The puritan smile: A look toward moral reflection. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neville, R. C. (1992). The highroad around modernism. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, G. (2008). Nature appreciation, science, and positive aesthetics. In A. Carlson & S. Lintott (Eds.), Nature, aesthetics, and environmentalism: From beauty to duty (pp. 302–317). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolston, H. (2008). From beauty to duty: Aesthetics of nature and environmental ethics. In A. Carlson & S. Lintott (Eds.), Nature, aesthetics, and environmentalism: From beauty to duty (pp. 325–338). New York: Columbia University Press.

  • Saito, Y. (2008). Appreciating nature on its own terms. In A. Carlson & S. Lintott (Eds.), Nature, aesthetics, and environmentalism: From beauty to duty (pp. 151–168). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoll, M. (2007). Religion “Irradiates” the Wilderness. In M. Lewis (Ed.), American wilderness: A new history (pp. 35–54). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, L. (1967). The historical roots of our ecological crisis. Science, 155, 1203–1207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worster, D. (1994). Nature’s economy: A history of ecological ideas (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nathaniel Barrett.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barrett, N. Allen Carlson and Sheila Lintott (eds): Nature, Aesthetics, and Environmentalism: From Beauty to Duty. J Agric Environ Ethics 24, 659–668 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-010-9258-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-010-9258-2

Navigation