Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Web of Controversies: Complexity in the Burgess Shale Debate

  • Published:
Journal of the History of Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using the Burgess Shale controversies as a case-study, this paper argues that controversies within different domains may interact as to create a situation of “com- plicated intricacies,” where the practicing scientist has to navigate through a context of multiple thought collectives. To some extent each of these collectives has its own dynamic complete with fairly negotiated standards for investigation and explanation, theoretical background assumptions and certain peculiarities of practice. But the intellectual development in one of these collectives may “spill over” having far reaching consequences for the treatment of apparently independent epistemic problems that are subject of investigation in other thought collectives. For the practicing scientist it is necessary to take this complex web of interactions into account in order to be able to navigate in such a situation. So far most studies of academic science have had a tendency to treat the practicing scientist as members of a single (enclosed) thought collective that stands intellectually isolated from other similar entities unless the discipline was in a state of crisis of paradigmatic proportions. The richness and complexity of Burgess Shale debate shows that this encapsulated kind of analysis is not enough.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baron, Christian. 2009. “Epistemic Values in the Burgess Shale Debate.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 40: 286–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowler, Peter J. 1983. The Eclipse of Darwinism: Anti-Darwinian Evolution Theories in the Decades Around 1900. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.

  • Briggs, Derek E.G. 1978. “The Morphology, Mode of Life, and Affinities of Canadaspis perfecta (Crustacea, Phyllocarida), Middle Cambrian, Burgess Shale, British Columbia.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 281: 439–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, Derek E.G. 1990. “Early Arthropods: Dampening the Cambrian Explosion.” Paleobiology 3: 24–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, Derek E.G. and Fortey, Richard. 1989. “The Early Radiation and Relationships of Major Arthropod Groups.” Science 246: 241–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, Derek E.G., Fortey, Richard and Wills, Matthew A. 1992a. “Morphological Disparity in the Cambrian.” Science 256: 1670–1673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, Derek E.G., Fortey, Richard, and Wills, Matthew A. 1992b. “Cambrian and Recent Morphological Disparity [Reply to Foote and Gould. 1992].” Science 258: 1817–1818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, Derek E.G., Erwin, Douglas H. and Collier, Frederick J. 1994. The Fossils of the Burgess Shale. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brysse, Keynyn. 2008. “From Weird Wonders to Stem Lineages: The Second Reclassification of the Burgess Shale Fauna.” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 39: 298–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J.Y., Oliveri, P., Li, C.W., Zhou, G.Q., Gao, F., Hagadorn, J.W., Peterson, K.J. and Davidson, E.H. 2000. “Precambrian Animal Diversity: Putative Phosphatized Embryos from the Doushanto Formation of China.” Science 97: 4457–4462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, H. and Pinch, Trevor. 1993. The Golem: What Everyone Should Know About Science. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway Morris, Simon. 1976a. “Nectocaris peryx, a New Organism from the Middle Cambrian Burgess Shale of British Columbia.” Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie 12: 705–713.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway Morris, Simon. 1976b. “A New Cambrian Lophophorate from the Burgess Shale of British Columbia.” Palaeontology 19: 199–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway Morris, Simon. 1977a. “A Redescription of the Middle Cambrian Worm Amiskwia saggittiformis Walcott from the Burgess Shale of British Columbia.” Paläontologische Zeitschrift 51: 271–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway Morris, Simon. 1977b. “A New Metazoan from the Cambrian Burgess Shale of British Columbia.” Palaeontology 20: 623–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway Morris, Simon. 1977c. “A New Entoproct-Like Organism from the Burgess Shale of British Columbia.” Palaeontology 20: 833–845.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway Morris, Simon. 1979. “The Burgess Shale (Middle Cambrian) Fauna.” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 10: 327–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway Morris, Simon. 1985a. “The Middle Cambrian Metazoan Wiwaxia corrugata (Matthew) from the Burgess Shale and Ogygopsis Shale, British Columbia, Canada.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 307: 507–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway Morris, Simon. 1985b. “Non-Skeletalized Lower Invertebrate Fossils: A Review.” S. Conway Morris, J.D. George, R. Gibson and H.M. Platt (eds.), The Origins and Relationships of Lower Invertebrates. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Conway Morris, Simon. 1986. “The Community Structure of the Middle Cambrian Phyllopod Bed (Burgess Shale).” Palaeontology 29: 423–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway Morris, Simon. 1989. “Burgess Shale Faunas and the Cambrian Explosion.” Science 246: 339–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway Morris, Simon. 1998. The Crucible of Creation: The Burgess Shale and the Rise of Animals. Oxford:Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway Morris, Simon and Whittington, Harry B. 1979. “The Animals of the Burgess Shale.” Scientific American 240: 122–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway Morris, Simon and Gould, Stephen J. 1998. “Showdown on the Burgess Shale.” Natural History Magazine 107(10): 48–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, Charles. 1859. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daston, Lorraine J. 1995. “The Moral Economy of Science.” Osiris 10: 3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge, Niles. 1971. “The Allopatric Model and Phylogeny in Paleozoic Invertebrates.” Evolution 25: 156–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge, Niles and Gould, Stephen J. 1972. “Punctuated Equilibria: An Alternative to Phyletic Gradualism.” J.M. Schopf Thomas (ed.), Models in Paleobiology. San Francisco: Freeman, Cooper & Company, pp. 82–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelhardt, H. Tristram Jr. and Caplan, Arthur L. (eds.). 1987. Scientific Controversies: Case Studies in the Resolution and Closure of Disputes in Science and Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleck, Ludwig. 1935/1979. Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact. London/Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

  • Foote, Mike. 1993. “Discordance and Concordance Between Morphological and Taxonomic Diversity.” Paleobiology 19: 185–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foote, Mike and Gould, Stephen J. 1992. ‘“Cambrian and Recent Morphological Disparity’ [Reply to Briggs et al. (1992a)].” Science 258: 1816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fortey, Richard. 1998. “Shock Lobsters: Book Review: The Crucible of Creation: The Burgess Shale and the Rise of Animals” London Review of Books 20: 24–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortey, Richard, Briggs, Derek E.G. and Wills, Matthew A. 1996. “The Cambrian Evolutionary ‘Explosion’: Decoupling Cladogenesis from Morphological Disparity.” Biological Journal of Linnean Society 57: 13–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortey, Richard, Briggs, Derek E.G. and Wills, Matthew A. 1997. “The Cambrian Evolutionary ‘Explosion’ Recalibrated.” BioEssay 19: 429–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1966/1994. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of Human Sciences. New York: Vintage Books.

  • Gingerich, Philip D. 1974. “Stratigragraphic Record of Early Eocene Hyopsodus and the Geometry of Mammalian Phylogeny.” Nature 248: 107–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gingerich, Philip D. 1976. “Paleontology and Phylogeny: Patterns of Evolution at the Species Level in Early Tertiary Mammals.” American Journal of Science 276: 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaessner, Martin F. 1984. The Dawn of Animal Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, Stephen J. 1980a. “Is a New and General Theory of Evolution Emerging?” Paleobiology 6: 119–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, Stephen J. 1980b. “The Promise of Paleobiology as a Nomothetic Discipline.” Paleobiology 6: 96–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, Stephen J. 1989. Wonderful Life: The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History. New York: W. W Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, Stephen J. 1991. “The Disparity of the Burgess Shale Arthropod Fauna and the Limits of Cladistic Analysis: Why We Must Strive to Quantify Morphospace.” Paleobiology 17: 411–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, Stephen J. 1993. “How to Analyse the Burgess Shale Disparity – A Reply to Ridley.” Paleobiology 19: 522–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, Stephen J. 2002. The Structure of Evolutionary Theory. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, Stephen J. and Eldredge, Niles. 1977. “Punctuated Equilibria: The Tempo and Mode of Evolution Reconsidered.” Paleobiology 3: 115–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S.J. and Lewontin, R.C. 1979. “The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A Critique of the Adaptationist Programme.” Proceedings of the Royal Society London Series B 205: 581–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, Ian. 2002. Historical Ontology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Hennig, Willi. 1966. Phylogenetic Systematics. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, M.R. 1979. “Discussion on Origin of Major Invertebrate Groups.” M.R. House (ed.), The Origin of Major Invertebrate Groups. London: Academic Press Inc., pp. 479–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, David L. 1988. Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, Thomas S. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Michael S.Y. 1992. “‘Cambrian and Recent Morphological Disparity’ [Reply to Briggs et al. (1992a)].” Science 258: 1816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, Richard C. 1974. The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change. New York/London: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, Elisabeth A. and Gould, Stephen J. 1993. “Species Selection on Variability.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 90: 595–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manton, Sidnie M. 1977. The Arthropoda: Habits, Functional Morphology and Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manton, Sidnie M. and Anderson, Donald T. 1979. “Polyphyly and the Evolution of the Arthropods.” M.R. House (ed.), The Origin of Major Invertebrate Groups. London: Academic Press Inc., pp. 269–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, Ernst. 1954. “Change of Genetic Environment and Evolution.” A.C. Julian Huxley and E.B. Ford Hardy (eds.), Evolution as a Process. London: Allen & Unwin, pp. 157–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, Ernst. 1963. Animal Species and Evolution. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of the Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, Stuart A. and Müller, Gerd B. 2006. “Genes and Form: Inherency in the Evolution of Developmental Mechanisms.” E.M. Neumann-Held and C. Rehmann-Sutter (eds.), Genes in Development: Re-Reading the Molecular Paradigm. Durham: Duke University Press, pp. 38–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsköld, Lars and Hou, Xianguang. 1991. “New Early Cambrian Animal and Onychophoran Affinities of Enigmatic Metazoans.” Nature 351: 225–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raup, David and Gould, Stephen J. 1974. “Stochastic Simulation and Evolution of Morphology: Towards a Nomothetic Paleontology.” Systematic Zoology 23: 525–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridley, Mark. 1993. “Analysis of the Burgess Shale.” Paleobiology 19: 519–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridley, Mark. 1996. Evolution, 2nd edn. London: Blackwell Science, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowland, Stephen M. 2001. “Archaeocyaths – a History of Phylogenetic Interpretation.” Journal of Paleontology 75(6): 1065–1078.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudwick, Martin. 1985. The Great Devonian Controversy: The Shaping of Scientific Knowledge Among Gentlemanly Specialists. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, Michael. 2000. “The Theory of Punctuated Equilibria: Taking Apart a Scientific Controversy.” P. Machamer, M. Pera and A. Baltas (eds.), Scientific Controversies: Philosophical and Historical Perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 231–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schopf, Thomas J.M. 1972. “Introduction: About This Book.” J.M. Schopf Thomas (ed.), Models in Paleobiology. San Francisco: Freeman, Cooper & Company, pp. 3–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schram, Frederick R. 1993. “The British School: Calman, Cannon and Manton and Their Effect on Carcinology in the English Speaking World.” Frederick R. Schram and F. Truesdale (eds.), Crustacean Issues 8: History of Carcinology. Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema, pp. 321–348.

  • Schuh, Randall T. 2000. Biological Systematics: Principles and Applications. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

  • Seilacher, Adolf. 1984. “Late Precambrian Metazoa: Preservational or Real Extinctions?” H.D. Holland and A.F. Trendall (eds.), Patterns of Change in Earth Evolution. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 159–168.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Segerstråle, Ullica. 2000. Defenders of the Truth: The Battle for Science in the Sociobiology Debate and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seilacher, Adolf, Bose, Pradip K. and Pflüger, Fridriech. 1998. “Triploblastic Animals: More Than 1 Billion Years Ago: Trace Fossil Evidence from India.” Science 282: 80–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sepkoski, David. 2005. “Stephen Jay Gould, Jack Sepkoski and the ‘Quantitative Revolution’ in American Paleontology.” Journal of History of Biology 38: 209–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapin, Steven and Schaffer, Simon. 1985. Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle and the Experimental Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, Steven M. 1975. “A Theory of Evolution Above the Species Level.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 72: 560–646.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, Steven M. 1979. Macroevolution: Pattern and Process. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suárez-Díaz, Edna and Anaya-Munoz, Victor H. 2008. “History, Objectivity, and the Construction of Molecular Phylogenies.” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 39: 451–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turney, Jon. 1987. “Thatcher Plans to Do More With Less.” The Scientist 1(16): 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, John. 1970. “Budget Cuts Prompt Closer Look at the System.” Science 168: 802–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittington, Harry B. 1975. “The Enigmatic Animal Opabinia regalis, Middle Cambrian, Burgess Shale, British Columbia.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 271: 1–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittington, Harry B. 1978. “The Lobopod Animal Aysheaia pedunculata Walcott, Middle Cambrian, Burgess Shale, British Columbia.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 284: 165–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittington, Harry B. 1979. “Early Arthropods, Their Appendages and Relationships.” M.R. House (ed.), The Origin of Major Invertebrate Groups. London: Academic Press Inc., pp. 253–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittington, Harry B. 1980. “The Significance of the Fauna of the Burgess Shale, Middle Cambrian, British Columbia.” Proceedings of the Geologists Association 91: 127–148.

  • Whittington, Harry B. 1985. The Burgess Shale. London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, David M. and Forey, Peter L. 2004. Milestones in Systematics. Boca Raton: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wills, Matthew A., Briggs, Derek E.G. and Fortey, Richard. 1994. “Disparity as an Evolutionary Index: A Comparison of Cambrian and Recent Arthropods.” Paleobiology 20: 93–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Edward O. 1975. Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Cambridge, MA/London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiao, Shuhai, Yuan, Xunlai and Knoll, Andrew H. 2000. “Eumetazoan Fossils in Terminal Proterozoic Phosphorites?” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 97: 13684–13689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziman, John. 2000. Real Science: What it is, and What it Means. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for the Philosophy of Nature and Science Studies, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 17, 2100 , Copenhagen, Denmark

    Christian Baron

Authors
  1. Christian Baron
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Baron.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baron, C. A Web of Controversies: Complexity in the Burgess Shale Debate. J Hist Biol 44, 745–780 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-010-9248-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-010-9248-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation