Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Deliberation at the hub of medical education: beyond virtue ethics and codes of practice

  • Scientific Contribution
  • Published:
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although both codes of practice and virtue ethics are integral to the ethos and history of “medical professionalism”, the two trends appear mutually incompatible. Hence, in the first part of the paper we explore and explicate this apparent conflict and seek a direction for medical education. The theoretical and empirical literature indicates that moral deliberation may transcend the incompatibilities between the formal and the virtuous, may enhance moral and other aspects of personal sensitivity, may help design and improve other parts of the curricula, and may foster self-awareness and clarification of the professional role. Not only are these goals essential for good and conscientious doctoring, but they may also reduce physicians’ “burn-out”. We argue that medical education should focus on the ubiquitous practice of deliberation in contemporary medicine, and especially the practice of moral deliberation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Since bioethical deliberation aims at practical and joint decision making, there must be one (or a set of) narrative which is the product of deliberation, and not of mere consensus or influence of the positivist or other biases. Even if no narrative closure is either possible or morally desirable, there should be a space of shared understanding that captures both the relevant voices and colors and the action ultimately taken.

References

  • ABIM, ACP-ASIM and European Federation of Internal Medicine. 2002. Medical professionalism in the new millennium: A physician charter. Annals of Internal Medicine 136: 243–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • ACGME. 2007. Common program requirements: General competencies. February 13th, 2007. http://www.acgme.org/outcome/comp/GeneralCompetenciesStandards21307.pdf.

  • Archer, R., W. Elder, C. Hustedde, A. Milan, and J. Joyce. 2008. The theory of planned behavior in medical education: A model for integrating professionalism training. Medical Education 42: 771–777.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arras, J. 2007. The way we reason now: Reflective equilibrium in bioethics. In Oxford handbook of bioethics, ed. B. Steinbock, 46–71. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballon, B.C., I. Silver, and D. Fidler. 2007. Headspace theatre: an innovative method for experiential learning of psychiatric symptomatology using modified role-playing and improvisational theater techniques. Academic Psychiatry 31: 380–387.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baltes, P.B., and U.M. Staudinger. 2000. 2000A meta-heuristic (pragmatic) to orchestrate mind and virtue towards excellence. American Psychologist 55: 122–136.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barilan, Y.M. 2009. Responsibility as a meta-virtue: truth-telling, deliberation and wisdom in medical professionalism. Journal of Medical Ethics 35: 153–158.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barilan, Y.M., and M. Brusa. 2011. Triangular reflective equilibrium: A consciences based method for bioethical deliberation. Bioethics 25: 304–319.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bazerman, M.H., and M.H. Tenbrunsel. 2011. Blind spots: Why we fail to do what’s right and what to do about it. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, L.W. 2008. Deliberation, story-telling and dialogical moments. Communication Theory 18: 93–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Branch, W.T. 2005. Use of critical incident report in medical education: A prospective. Journal of General Internal Medicine 20: 1063–1067.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cantor, J. 2009. Conscientious objection gone awry—restoring self-less professionalism in medicine. New England Journal Medicine 360: 15–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charon, R. 2009. Commentary on “creative expressive encounters in health ethics education: teaching ethics as relational engagement”. Teaching and Learning Medicine 21: 163–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chopra, S.S. 2004. Physician burnout. Journal of the American Medical Association 291: 633.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J.D., S.M. McClure, and J.A. Yu. 2007. Should I stay or should I go? How the human brain manages the trade-off between exploitation and exploration. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 362: 933–942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, N. 1979. Wide reflective equilibrium and theory acceptance in ethics. Journal of Philosophy 76: 256–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. 2007. Eighteen rules for writing a code of professional ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics 13: 171–189.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DeMarco, J.P., and P.J. Ford. 2006. Balancing is superior to specification and casuistry. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31: 483–497.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Distlehorst, L.H., E. Dawson, R.S. Robbs, and H.S. Barrows. 2005. Problem-based learning outcomes: the glass half-full. Academic Medicine 80: 294–299.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, R.M. 2008. Reflection, perception and the acquisition of wisdom. Medical Education 42: 1048–1050.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. 1980. Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughs, J. 1995. Ultimate justification: Wittgenstein and medical ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics 21: 25–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, L. 2001. Beyond cultural competence: Applying humility to clinical settings. Bulletin of the Park Ridge Center 24: 3–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hursthouse, R. 2002. On virtue ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, E.J., J.C. Jackson, L. Kratz, E.K. Marcuse, H.A. McPhillips, R.P. Shugerman, et al. 2003. Teaching professionalism to residents. Academic Medicine 78: 26–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Komessaroff, K.A., and I.H. Kerridge. 2009. The Australian Medical Council draft code of professional conduct: good practice or creeping authoritarianism? Medical Journal of Australia 190: 204–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kugamai, A.K., and M.L. Lypson. 2009. Beyond cultural competence: Critical consciousness, social justice and multicultural education. Academic Medicine 84: 782–787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, M.O. 1995. Seeing and caring: The role of affect in feminist moral epistemology. Hypatia 10: 117–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, J. 1979. Virtue and reason. Monist 62: 331–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, P.S. 2009. Incorporating professionalism into medical education: The Mayo clinic experience. Keio Journal of Medicine 58: 133–143.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mylopoulos, M., and M. Scardamalia. 2008. Doctors’ perspectives on their innovations in daily practice: Implications for knowledge building in health care. Medical Education 42: 975–981.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pincoffs, E. 1970. Quandry ethics. Mind 80: 552–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, J., E.S. Spatz, A.M.J. Gaaserud, H. Abramovitch, B. Weinreb, N.S. Wanger, et al. 2004. A new approach to developing cross-cultural communication skills. Medical Teacher 26: 126–132.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scanlon, T.M. 2003. Rawls on justification. In The Cambridge companion to Rawls, vol. 3, ed. S. Freeman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneiderhan, E., and S. Khan. 2008. Reasons and inclusions: The foundations of deliberation. Sociological Theory 26: 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schooler, J.W., and B. Bower. 2003. Words get in the way. Science News 163: 250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwitzgebel, E. 2009. The moral behavior of ethicists: Peer opinion. Mind 118: 1043–1059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slote, M. 1992. From morality to virtue. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, B.M., C.R. Teal, J.C. Rogers, D.A. Paterniti, and P. Haidet. 2010. Ideals, activities, dissonance and processing: A conceptual model to guide educators’ efforts to stimulate students’ reflection. Academic Medicine 85: 902–908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torppa, M.A., E. Makkonen, C. Mårtenson, K.H. Pitkälä, E. Makkonen, C. Mårtenson, et al. 2008. A qualitative analysis of student Balint groups in medical education: contexts and triggers of case presentations and discussion themes. Patient Education and Counseling 72: 5–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Udwadia, F.E. 1986. Management situations and the engineering mindset. Technological Forecast and Social Change 29: 387–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by a grant from the Israeli Scientific Foundation (197/10).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Y. M. Barilan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barilan, Y.M., Brusa, M. Deliberation at the hub of medical education: beyond virtue ethics and codes of practice. Med Health Care and Philos 16, 3–12 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-012-9419-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-012-9419-3

Keywords

Navigation