Skip to main content
Log in

Introduction

  • Published:
Topoi Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Bibliography

  • Albert, D.: 1992,Quantum Mechanics and Experience, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albert, D. and Loewer, B.: 1988, ‘Interpreting the many-worlds interpretation’,Synthese 77, 195–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, J.: 1995, ‘The suggestive properties of quantum mechanics without the collapse postulate’, forthcoming inErkenntnis.

  • Baym, G.: 1969,Lectures on Quantum Mechanics, Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, J.: 1987,Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, D.: 1951,Quantum Theory, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, D.: 1952, ‘A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of “hidden” variables, I and II’,Physical Review 85, 166–93; reprinted in Wheeler and Zurek (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, D.: and Hiley, B.: 1993,The Undivided Universe: An Ontological Interpretation of Quantum Theory, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Born, M.: 1926, ‘Quantenmechanik der Stossvorgänge’,Zeitschrift für Physik 38, 803–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Born, M.: 1968,My Life and My Views, Scribner, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, T., Prance, H., Prance, R. and Spiller, T. (eds.): 1991,Macroscopic Quantum Phenomena, World Scientific, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Broglie, L.: 1923, ‘Ondes et Quanta’,Comptes Rendus 177, 507–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • D'Espagnat, B.: 1971,Conceptual Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Benjamin, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeWitt, B. and Graham, N. (eds.): 1973,The Many Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirac, P.: 1958,The Principles of Quantum Mechanics, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Everett, H.: 1957, ‘“Relative State” Formulation of Quantum Mechanics’,Reviews of Modern Physics 29, 454–62; reprinted in DeWitt and Graham (eds.), 1973, 141–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Everett, H.: 1973, ‘Theory of the universal wave-function’, in DeWitt and Graham (1973).

  • Gell-Mann, M. and Hartle, J. B.: 1990, ‘Quantum mechanics in the light of quantum cosmology’, in W. H. Zurek (ed.),Complexity, Entropy, and the Physics of Information, Proceedings of the Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity, vol. VIII, Addison-Wesley, Redwood City, CA, pp. 425–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghirardi, G., Rimini, A. and Weber, T.: 1986, ‘Unified dynamics for microscopic and macroscopic systems’,Physical Review D 34, 4701–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healey, R.: 1989,The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics: An Interactive Interpretation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heisenberg, W.: 1925, ‘Über quantentheoretische Umdeutung kinematischer und mechanischer Beziehungen’,Zeitschrift für Physik 33, 879–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, R.: 1989,The Structure and Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, Harvard, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jammer, M.: 1966,The Conceptual Development of Quantum Mechanics, McGrawHill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leggett A.: 1986, ‘The superposition principle in macroscopic systems’, in Penrose and Isham (1986).

  • Mackey, G.: 1963,Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Benjamin, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mermin, N.: 1990, ‘Simple unified form for the major no-hidden-variables theorems’,Physical Review Letters 65, 3373–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messiah, A.: 1965,Quantum Mechanics, vol. I, North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omnés, R.: 1992, ‘Consistent interpretations of quantum mechanics’,Reviews of Modern Physics 64(2), 339–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pais, A.: 1988,Inward Bound: Of Matter and Forces in the Physical World, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, R. and Isham, C. (eds.): 1986,Quantum Concepts in Space and Time, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, L.: 1971, ‘Men and ideas in the history of atomic theory’,Arch. Hist. Exact Sci. 7, 69–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schrödinger, E.: 1926a, ‘Quantisierung als Eigenwertproblem’ (First Part),Annalen der Physik 79, 361–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schrödinger, E.: 1926b, ‘Quantisierung als Eigenwertproblem’ (Third Part),Annalen der Physik 81, 109–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schrödinger, E.: 1926c, ‘Der stetige Übergang von der Mikro-zur Makromechanik’,Die Naturwissenschaften 14, 664–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shimony, A.: 1989, ‘Conceptual foundations of quantum mechanics’, in P. Davies (ed.),The New Physics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudbery, A.: 1986,Quantum Mechanics and the Particles of Nature, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Fraassen, B.: 1991,Quantum Mechanics: An Empiricist View, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vink, J.: 1993, ‘Quantum mechanics in terms of discrete beables’,Physical Review A 48, 1808–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann, J.: 1955,Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ; a translation of 1932,Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik, Springer, Berlin (translated by R. Beyer).

    Google Scholar 

  • Waerden, B.: 1968,Sources in Quantum Mechanics, Dover, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, J.: and Zurek, W. (eds.): 1983,Quantum Theory and Measurement, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigner, E.: 1961, ‘Remarks on the mind-body question’, in Good (ed.),The Scientist Speculates, pp. 284–302; reprinted in Wheeler and Zurek (1983), pp. 168–181.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This introduction and most of the papers in this volume assume some understanding of how the standard formulation of quantum mechanics works and of the basic mathematics involved. There are, of course, several very good, accessible introductions to quantum mechanics. Albert (1992) requires little mathematical background and is a clear introduction to quantum mechanics and some of the problems involved in formulating a satisfactory theory. Also worth mention are Shimony (1989), Hughes (1989), and van Fraassen (1991). As long as we are on the topic of literature, there are two collections of papers that are particularly good: Wheeler and Zurek (1983) and Bell (1987). The first is a general collection on the measurement problem and the interpretation of quantum mechanics and the second contains some of Bell's papers. For detailed descriptions of the standard formulation of quantum mechanics, its historical development, how it is used, and the mathematics involved, one might consult von Neumann (1955), Dirac (1958), Messiah (1965), Mackey (1963), and Baym (1969). These are all standard texts and each provides a slightly different perspective. Finally, some of the works that have been particularly influential in the development of quantum mechanics and its interpretation are mentioned in the following bibliography.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barrett, J.A. Introduction. Topoi 14, 1–6 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00763472

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00763472

Navigation