Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

On branching quantifiers in English

  • Published:
Journal of Philosophical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aczel, P., ‘Quantifiers, Games and Inductive Definitions’, Proc. of 3rd Scandinavian Logic Symposium, North Holland, Amsterdam, 1975.

  • Barwise, J., Admissible Sets and Structures, Springer-Verlag, 1975.

  • BarwiseJ., ‘Some Applications of Henkin Quantifiers’, Israel J. Math. 25 (1976), 47–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • BarwiseJ. (ed.), Handbook of Mathematical Logic, North Holland, Amsterdam, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • BarwiseJ., ‘Monotone Quantifiers and Admissible Sets’, Generalized Recursion Theory II, North Holland, Amsterdam, 1978, pp. 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwise, J. and Moschovakis, Y. N., ‘Global Inductive Definability’, J. Symbolic Logic 43 (1978).

  • Bruce, K., ‘Ideal Models and Some Not So Ideal Problems in the Theory of L(Q), J. Symbolic Logic (1978).

  • EndertonH. B., ‘Finite Partially-ordered Quantifiers’, Z. Math. Logik und Grundlagen der Math. 16 (1970) 393–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • FauconnierG., ‘Do Quantifiers Branch?’, Linguistic Inquiry VI (1975), 555–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • GabbayD., and MoravcsikJ. M. E., ‘Branching Quantifiers, English and Montague Grammar’, Theoretical Linguistics 1 (1974) 141–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guenthner, F. and Hoepelman, J., ‘A Note on the Representation of “Branching Quantifiers”’, Theoretical Linguistics (1974), 285–291.

  • Henkin, L., ‘Some Remarks on Infinitely Long Formulas’, Infinitistic Methods, Warsaw, pp. 167–183.

  • HintikkaJ., ‘Quantifiers vs. Quantification Theory’, Dialectica 27 (1973), 329–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • HintikkaJ., ‘Quantifiers vs. Quantification Theory’, Lingusitic Inquiry V (1974), 153–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • HintikkaJ., ‘Partially Ordered Quantifiers vs. Partially Ordered Ideas’, Dialectica 30 (1976), 89–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • IoupG., ‘Some Universals for Quantifier Scope’, in J. P.Kimball (ed.), Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 4, pp. 37–58, Academic Press, New York, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • KeislerH. J., ‘Logic with the Quantifier “There Exist Uncountably Many”’, Annals of Math. Logic I (1970), 1–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • MagidorM. and MalitzJ., ‘Compact Extensions of L(Q) (Part 1a)’, Annals of Math. Logic 11 (1977), 217–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montague, R., in R. Thomason (ed.), Formal Philosophy, Yale Univ. Press, 1974.

  • MoschovakisY. N., Elementary Induction in Abstract Structures, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • SteniusE., ‘Comments on Jaakko Hintikka's Paper “Quantifiers vs. Quantification Theory”’, Dialectica 30 (1976), 67–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • WalkoeW.Jr., ‘Finite Partially Ordered Quantification’, Journal of Symbolic Logic 35 (1970), 535–550.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mathematics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA

    Jon Barwise

Authors
  1. Jon Barwise
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

The preparation of this paper was partially supported by NSF Grant MSC76-06541.

I would like to thank Robin Cooper for valuable comments on an earlier draft of this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barwise, J. On branching quantifiers in English. J Philos Logic 8, 47–80 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00258419

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00258419

Search

Navigation