Skip to main content
Log in

On collective intentions: collective action in economics and philosophy

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Philosophers and economists write about collective action from distinct but related points of view. This paper aims to bridge these perspectives. Economists have been concerned with rationality in a strategic context. There, problems posed by “coordination games” seem to point to a form of rational action, “team thinking,” which is not individualistic. Philosophers’ analyses of collective intention, however, sometimes reduce collective action to a set of individually instrumental actions. They do not, therefore, capture the first person plural perspective characteristic of team thinking. Other analyses, problematically, depict intentions ranging over others’ actions. I offer an analysis of collective intention which avoids these problems. A collective intention aims only at causing an individual action, but its propositional content stipulates its mirroring in other minds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bacharach M. (1999). Interactive team reasoning: a contribution to the theory of cooperation. Research in Economics, 53, 117–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardsley N. (2000). Interpersonal interaction and economic theory: the case of public goods. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics 71, 191–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjerring A (1978): The tracing procedure and a theory of rational interaction. In: Hooker C.A., Leach J., McClennen E.(Eds). Foundations and applications of decision theory. Reidel, Dordrecht, p. 4-3

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratman M. (1992). Shared cooperative activity. Philosophical Review 101, 327–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bratman, M. (1997). I intend that We J. In R. Tuomela, & G. Holmstrom-Hintikka (Eds.), Contemporary action theory, social action (vol. 2, pp. 49–63). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  • Camerer C.F., Ho T., Chong K. (2004). A cognitive hierarchy model of games. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119, 861–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis J.B. (2003). Collective intentionality, complex economic behavior, and valuation. Protosociology, 18–19, 163–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster J. (1983). Explaining technical change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert M. (1981):Game theory and social convention. Synthese, 46, 41–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert M. (1989). On social facts. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves H.S., Hollis M., Lyons B., Sugden R., Weale A. (1992). The theory of choice. Basil Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi J. (1975). The tracing procedure. International Journal of Game Theory 4, 61–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollis M. (1998). Trust within reason. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurley S. (1989). Natural reasons. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutz C. (2000). Acting together. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 61, 1–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis D.K. (1969). Convention: A philosophical study. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehta J., Starmer C., Sugden R. (1994) The nature of salience: an experimental investigation. American Economic Review, 84, 658–673

    Google Scholar 

  • Parfit (1984). Reasons and persons. Clarendon, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacocke C. (2005). Joint attention: its nature, reflexivity, and relation to common knowledge. In: Eilan N., Hoerl C., McCormack T., Roessler J. (Eds). Joint attention: communication and other minds. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 298–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Regan D. (1980). Utilitarianism and cooperation. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, J. P. (1943). Being and nothingness, H. Barnes, (Trans). London: Methuen. 1976.

  • Schelling T. C(1960). The strategy of conflict. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle J.R. (1990). Collective intentions and actions. In: Cohen P.R., Morgan J., Pollack M.E. (Eds). Intentions in communication. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp. 401–415

    Google Scholar 

  • Skyrms B. (1989). Correlated equilibria and the dynamics of rational deliberation. Erkenntnis, 31, 347–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stahl D.O., Wilson P. (1995). On players’ models of other players. Games and Economic Behavior 10, 218–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sugden R. (1993). Thinking as a team. In: Paul E.F., Miller F.D., Paul J. (Eds). Altruism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 5-4

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugden R. (1995). A theory of focal points. Economic Journal, 105, 533–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swindler J. K. (1996). Social intentions: aggregate, collective and general. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 26, 61–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuomela R. (1984). A theory of social action. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuomela R., Miller K. (1988). We-intentions. Philosophical Studies 53, 367–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuomela R. (1995). The importance of us. Stanford University Press, Standford, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Velleman J.D. (1997). How to share an intention. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57, 29–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson O. (1975). Markets and hierarchies. Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicholas Bardsley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bardsley, N. On collective intentions: collective action in economics and philosophy. Synthese 157, 141–159 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-006-9034-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-006-9034-z

Keywords

Navigation