Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Providing justice and reconciliation: The criminal tribunals for Sierra Leone and Cambodia

  • Articles
  • Published:
Human Rights Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL) and the Extraordinary Chambers for Cambodia (ECC) represent a departure from the model established by the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yygoslavia (ICTY) and the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR). The SCSL and the ECC have often been referred to as “mixed” or “hybrid” tribunals in which there are significant domestic and international components. The tribunals include a combination of domestic and international judges, utilize domestic and international laws and are administered by a prosecutorial team composed of domestic and international lawyers. Many of these institutional changes have been brought about because of criticisms of the ICTY and the ICTR. The fundamental question of this article is whether these mixed tribunals are a more effective mechanism for providing justice and reconciliation than purely international solutions. This is an important question because both the international community and states are moving in the direction of mixed tribunals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amann, Diane Marie. 2001. “Calling Children to Account: The Proposal for a Juvenile Chamber in the Special Court for Sierra Leone.” Pepperdine Law Review 29:167–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bald, Stephanie. 2002. “Searching for a Lost Childhood: Will the Special Court of Sierra Leone Find Justice for Its Children?” American University International Law Review 18:537–583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barria, Lilian A., and Steven D. Roper. 2005. “How Effective are International Criminal Tribunals? An Analysis of the ICTY and the ICTR.” International Journal of Human Rights 9:349–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerone, John. 2002. “The Special Court for Sierra Leone: Establishing a New Approach to International Criminal Justice.” ILSA: The Journal of International & Comparative Law 8:379–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, David. 1992. A History of Cambodia. 2nd Edition. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, Susan E. 2001. “Prosecuting Genocide in Cambodia: The Winding Path Towards Justice.” Crimes of War Magazine. http://www.crimesofwar.org/tribun-mag/cambodia_print.html (24 April 2004).

  • Cryer, Robert. 2001. “A ‘Special Court’ for Sierra Leone?” The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 50:435–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Nike, Howard J., John Quigley, and Kenneth J. Robinson, eds. 2000. Genocide in Cambodia: Documents from the Trial of Pol Pot and Ieng Sary. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritz, Nicole, and Alison Smith. 2001. “Current Apathy for Coming Anarchy: Building the Special Court for Sierra Leone.” Fordham International Law Journal 25:391–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, Karen 2000. “No Justice, No Peace: The Legalities and Realities of Amnesty of Sierra Leone.” Thomas Jefferson Law Review 23:149–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heder, Stephen, and Brian D. Tittemore. 2001. Seven Candidates for Prosecution: Accountability for the Crimes of the Khmer Rouge. Washington, DC War Crimes Research Office, American University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, John L. 2001. Sierra Leone: Diamonds and the Struggle for Democracy. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICG. 2002. Sierra Leone's Truth and Reconciliation Commission: A Fresh Start? 20 December.

  • Jarvis, Helen. 2002. “Trials and Tribulations: The Latest Twist in the Long Quest for Justice for the Cambodian Genocide.” Critical Asian Studies 34 (Winter): 607–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamm, Henry. 1998. Cambodia: Reports from a Stricken Land. New York, NY: Arcade Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiernan, Ben. 1996. The Pol Pot Regime: Race, Power, and Genocide in Cambodia Under the Khmer Rouge, 1975–1979. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiernan, Ben. 2002. “Introduction: Conflict in Cambodia, 1945–2002.” Critical Asian Studies 34 (Winter): 483–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kritz, Neil J. 1996. “Coming to Terms with Atrocities: A Review of Accountability Mechanisms for Mass Violations of Human Rights.” Law & Contemporary Problems 59:127–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linton, Suzannah. 2001. “Cambodia, East Timor and Sierra Leone: Experiments in International Justice.” Criminal Law Forum 12:185–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayall, James. 1996. The New Interventionism 1991–1994: United Nations Experience in Cambodia, former Yugoslavia and Somalia Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, Avril. 2002. “Sierra Leone's Shoestring Special Court.” International Review of the Red Cross 84:121–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maculuso, Daniel J. 2001. “Absolute and Free Pardon: The Effect of the Amnesty Provision in the Lomé Peace Agreement on the Jurisdiction of the Special Court for Sierra Leone.” Brooklyn Journal of International Law 27:347–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pringle. John. 2004. “Meanwhile: The Quiet Retirement of Pol Pot's Cronies.” International Herald Tribune (17 April).

  • Ratner, Steven R., and Jason S. Abrahms. 2001. Accountability for Human Rights Atrocities in International Law: Beyond the Nuremberg Legacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Legal Council. 2002. Negotiations between the UN and Cambodia Regarding the Establishment of the Court to Try Khmer Rouge Leaders: Statement by UN Legal Counsel Hans Corell.

  • United Nations Doc. 2000. Report of the Secretary-General on the Establishment of a Special Court for Sierra Leone. UN SCOR. 52nd Sess., Doc. S/2000/915.

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barria, L.A., Roper, S.D. Providing justice and reconciliation: The criminal tribunals for Sierra Leone and Cambodia. Hum Rights Rev 7, 5–26 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-005-1000-5

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-005-1000-5

Keywords

Navigation