Source Related Argumentation Found in Science Websites

a quantitative study

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v40i30.5984

Abstract

In this paper, we consider the way that web documents seeking to persuade readers of certain science claims provide information about the sources of the arguments. Our quantitative analysis reveals that web documents in our sample include hundreds of examples in which the reader is provided information regarding the trustworthiness (or lack thereof) of sources. The web documents also contain a large number of examples in which the reader is provided with information about how many individuals hold a particular belief. We discuss ad hominem, ad verecundiam, and ad populum arguments, and the way that the examples found in our sample of documents are related to these argumentation schemes.

Author Biographies

Zoë Neumann, Montana State University

Zoë earned a bachelor's degree from Montana State University in Spring 2019.

Samuel Draznin-Nagy, Montana State University

Samuel is currently a student enrolled at Montana State University.

Downloads

Published

2020-08-29

Issue

Vol. 40 No. 3 (2020)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright for each article published in Informal Logic belongs to its author(s). Informal Logic has the right of first publication. Permission to reprint any article that appears in Informal Logic MUST be obtained in writing from the author(s). In addition to any form of acknowledgement required by the author(s), the following notice must be added to the statement of copyright permission made in the reprint (with the appropriate numbers replacing the ellipses): [Article Title] was originally published in Informal Logic, [year], Volume ..., Number ..., pp. ...-... .