Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Bribery in International Business Transactions

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Globalization leads to cross-border business transactions between societies with very different norms and regulations regarding bribery. Bribery in international business transactions can be seen as a function of not only the demand for such bribes in different countries, but the supply, or willingness to provide bribes by multinational firms and their representatives. This study addresses the propensity of firms from 30 different countries to engage in international bribery. The study incorporates both domestic (economic development, culture, and domestic corruption in the supplying country) and international factors (those countries’ patterns of trade and involvement in international accords) in explaining the willingness to bribe abroad. The propensity to provide bribes was the lowest when corruption was not tolerated in the multinational firms’ home countries, when the firms’ countries were signatories of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) anti-bribery convention, and when those countries traded heavily with wealthier nations. Further, these findings are maintained when controlling for levels of economic development and cultural values in the supplying country. In terms of culture, firms from high power distance countries showed a somewhat greater propensity for providing bribes in transactions with less-developed nations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Apke, T.M.: 2001, ‘Impact of OECD Convention Anti-bribery Provisions on International Companies’, Managerial Auditing Journal 16(2), 58-62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argandoña, A.: 2007,‘The United Nations Convention Against Corruption and its Impact on International Companies’, Journal of Business Ethics 74(4), 481-496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardhan, P.: 1997, ‘Corruption and Development: A Review of Issues’, Journal of Economic Literature 35(3), 1320-1346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beets, S. D.: 2005, ‘Understanding the Demand-side Issues of International Corruption.’ Journal of Business Ethics 57(1), 65-81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Foreign Trade Statistics, http://eweb.trade.gov.tw. Accessed 5 Nov 2007

  • Campos, J., D. Lien, and S. Pradhan: 1999, ‘The Impact of Corruption on Investment: Predictability Matters’ World Development 27(6), 1059-1067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., M. Yaşar, and R.M. Rejesus: 2008, ‘Factors Influencing the Incidence of Bribery Payouts by Firms: A Cross-country Analysis. Journal of Business Ethics 77(2), 231-244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conde, C.: 2004, ‘Philippine Maoists Make Firms Pay: A “Tax” to Fund Rebels’, International Herald Tribune News, October 20, 2004, http://www.iht.com/articles/2004/10/20/1firstR_54.php. Accessed 25 Oct 2007

  • Direction of Trade Statistics: 2007, June, International Monetary Fund

  • Esty, D. and M. Porter: 2002, ‘National Environmental Performance Measurements and Determinants’, in D. Esty and P. Cornelius (eds.), Environmental Performance Measurement: The Global Report 2001–2002 (Oxford University Press, New York & Oxford)

  • Fox, J.: 1991, Regression Diagnostics. (Sage Publications, Newberry Park, Ca.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Getz, K., and R. Volkema: 2001, ‘Culture, Perceived Corruption, and Economics’, Business and Society 40(1), 7-30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamra, W.: 2000, ‘Bribery in International Business Transactions and the OECD Convention: Benefits and Limitations’, Business Economics 35(4), 33-46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. 2001, Culture’s Consequences (2nd Edition). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husted, B.: 1999, ‘Wealth, Culture, and Corruption’, Journal of International Business Studies 30(2), 339-359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaikati, J.G., G.M. Sullivan, J.M. Virgo, T.R. Carr, and K.S. Virgo: 2000, ‘The Price of International Business Morality: Twenty Years Under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act’, Journal of Business Ethics 26(3), 213-222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krasner, S.D.:1988, ‘Sovereignty: An Institutional Perspective’, Comparative Political Studies 21(1), 66-84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambsdorff, J. G.: 2006, ‘The Methodology of the Corruption Perceptions Index 2006’, Internet Center for Corruption Research, http://www.icgg.org/corruption.cpi_2006.html. Accessed 12 Oct 2007

  • Lambsdorff, J.G.:2007, The Institutional Economics of Corruption and Reform: Theory, Evidence and Policy (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez-Claros, A. M.E. Porter, X. Sala-i-Martin, and K. Schwab: 2006, The Global Competitiveness Report 2006-2007 (World Economic Forum, Geneva).

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, K.D., J. Cullen, J.L. Johnson, and K. P. Parboteeah: 2007, Deciding to Bribe: A Cross-Level Analysis of Firm and Home Country Influences on Bribery Activity. Academy of Management Journal 50(6), 1401-1422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauro, P.: 1995, ‘Corruption and Growth’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 110(3), 681-712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauro, P.: 1998, ‘Corruption, Causes, Consequences, and Agenda for Further Research ‘, Finance and Development 35(1), 11-14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, N.: 1997, ‘Who Bribes Wins’, The European, December 11, 26-27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagarajan, R.: 2006, ‘India Top Bribe Payer. What About Takers?’, Knight Ridder Tribune Business News. Washington, Oct 7, 2006, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D.C.:1990, Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nwabuzor, A.: 2005, ‘Corruption and Development: New Initiatives in Economic Openness and Strengthened Rule of Law’, Journal of Business Ethics 59(1-2), 121-138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD, http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/59/13/40272933.pdf. Accessed 4 Aug 2008

  • Olaya, J. 2006, ‘Looking Under Every Stone: Transparency International and the Fight Against Corruption’, In Lopez-Claros, A. Porter, M.E., Sala-i-Martin, X., & Schwab, K. (pp. 95-103). The Global Competitiveness Report 2006-2007 (World Economic Forum, Geneva).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacini, C., J.A. Swingen, and H. Rogers: 2002, ‘The Role of the OECD and EU Conventions in Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials’, Journal of Business Ethics 37(4), 385-405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M.W. and P.S. Heath: 1996, ‘The Growth of the Firm in Planned Economies in Transition: Institutions, Organizations, and Strategic Choice’, Academy of Management Review 21(2), 492-528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rauch, J.: 1995, ‘Bureaucracy, Infrastructure, and Economic Growth: Evidence from U.S. Cities During the Progressive Era’, American Economic Review 85(4), 968-979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruzindana, A.: 1997, ‘The Importance of Leadership in Fighting Corruption in Uganda, (in K. Elliott, ed.) Corruption and the Global Economy (Institute for International Economics Washington, D.C.) 133-145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanyal, R.: 2005, ‘Determinants of Bribery in International Business: The Cultural and Economic Factors’, Journal of Business Ethics 59(1-2), 139-145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanyal, R. and S. Samanta: 2002, ‘Corruption Across Countries: The Cultural and Economic Factors’, Business and Professional Ethics Journal 21(1), 21-46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanyal, R. and S. Samanta: 2004a, ‘Determinants of Bribery in International Business’, Thunderbird International Business Review 46(2), 133-146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanyal, R. and S. Samanta: 2004b, ‘Correlates of Bribe Giving in International Business’, International Journal of Commerce & Management 4(2), 2-13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W.R.: 1995. Institutions and Organizations (Sage, Thousand Oaks, Ca.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sung, H.-E.: 2005. ‘Between Demand and Supply: Bribery in International Trade’, Crime, Law & Social Change 44(1), 111-131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theobald, R.: 2002, ‘Containing Corruption: Can the State Deliver?’ New Political Economy 7(3), 435-499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Transparency International: 2002, ‘Bribe Payer’s Index 2002’, http://www.transparency.org/policy_research/surveys_indices/bpi/bpi_2002. Accessed 31 Aug 2007

  • Transparency International: 2006a, ‘Bribe Payers Index (BPI) 2006 Analysis Report’, http://www.transparency.org/policy_research/surveys_indices/bpi/bpi_2006. Accessed 31 Aug 2007

  • Transparency International: 2006b, ‘Leading Exporters Undermine Development with Dirty Business Overseas’, http://www.transparency.org/policy_research/surveys_indices/bpi/bpi_2006. Accessed 31 Aug 2007

  • Transparency International: 2006c, ‘Corruption Perception Index’, http://www.transparency.org/policy_research/surveys_indices/cpi/2006. Accessed 31 Aug 2007

  • Treisman, D., 2000:, The Causes of Corruption: A Cross National Study. Journal of Public Economics 76(3), 399-457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, http://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/treaties/CAC/signatories.html. Accessed 4 Sept 2008

  • Vogl, F., 1998, ‘The Supply Side of Global Bribery’, Finance and Development 35(2), 30-33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, M., I. Filatotchev, R. Hoskisson, and M. Peng: 2005, ‘Strategy Research in Emerging Economies: Challenging the Conventional Wisdom’, Journal of Management Studies 42(1), 1-33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher Baughn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baughn, C., Bodie, N.L., Buchanan, M.A. et al. Bribery in International Business Transactions. J Bus Ethics 92, 15–32 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0136-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0136-7

Keywords

Navigation