Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluating Time Streams of Income: Discounting What?

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For decisions whose consequences accrue over time, there are several possible techniques to compute total utility. One is to discount utilities of future consequences at some appropriate rate. The second is to discount per-period certainty equivalents. And the third is to compute net present values (NPVs) of various possible streams and to then apply the utility function to these net present values. We find that the best approach is to first compute NPVs of various possible income streams and then take the utility of such NPVs. We show the drawbacks of other alternative models of evaluating income streams. The article discusses the advantages of the power and logarithmic forms in the modeling of time preference. These are the only forms for which utility of income and utility of consumption are strategically equivalent. Further, these forms permit the flexibility in the choice of a time period (e.g., monthly or quarterly) without modifying the utility function, thus simplifying analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aczél J. (1966), Lectures on Functional Equations and Their Applications. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Baucells M., Sarin R. (2007), Satiation in discounted utility. Operations Research 55(1): 170–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell D.E. (1974), Evaluating time streams of income, Omega. The International Journal of Management Science 2(5): 691–699

    Google Scholar 

  • Brealey R., Myers S. (1991), Principles of Corporate Finance, 4 edn, McGraw Hill.

  • Clemen R. (1996), Making Hard Decisions: An Introduction to Decision Analysis. Duxbury Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer J.S., Sarin R.K. (1982), Relative risk aversion. Management Science 28(8): 875–886

    Google Scholar 

  • Gollier C. (2004), The Economics of Risk and Time. The MIT Press, Cambridge Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinblatt M., Titman S. (1998), Financial Markets and Corporate Strategy, Irwin McGraw Hill

  • Keeney R., Raiffa H. (1976), Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preference and Value Tradeoffs, John Wiley.

  • Koopmans T.C. (1960), Stationary Ordinal Utility and Impatience. Econometrica 28(2): 287–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans T.C., Diamond P.A., Williamson R.E. (1964), Stationary utility and time perspective. Econometrica 32(1–2): 82–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matheson J. and Abbas A. (2006), Utility transeversality: A value-based approach (forthcoming), Journal of Multicriteria Decision Analysis.

  • Mossin J. (1968), Optimal multiperiod portfolio policies. Journal of Business 41, 215–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith J. (1998), Evaluating income streams: a decision analysis approach. Management Science 44(12): 1690–1708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thaler R.H. (1981), Some empirical-evidence on dynamic inconsistency. Economics Letters 8(3): 201–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manel Baucells.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baucells, M., Sarin, R.K. Evaluating Time Streams of Income: Discounting What?. Theor Decis 63, 95–120 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-007-9045-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-007-9045-3

Keywords

Navigation