Skip to main content
Log in

Business Faculty Perceptions and Actions Regarding Ethics Education

  • Published:
Journal of Academic Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines faculty perceptions regarding ethical behavior among colleagues and students, and faculty practices with regard to teaching ethics in three institutions over a 4-year period. Faculty reported an uneven pattern of unethical behavior among colleagues over the period. A majority of business courses included ethics, however as both a specific topic on the syllabus and within course discussions. The percentage of courses with ethics discussions increased in 2006, however, the time allocated to these discussions decreased. These results suggest that faculty are approaching ethics instruction less formally, raising concerns over the success of curriculum integration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AACSB International Ethics Education Task Force (2004). Ethics education in business schools. AACSB International, (www.aacsb.edu/resource_centers/ethicsedu/EETF-report-6-25-04.pdf), Accessed December 29, 2005.

  • Adams, J. S., Harris, C., & Carley, S. S. (1998). Challenges in teaching business ethics: Using role set analysis of early career dilemmas. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 1325–1335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernardi, R. A., Metzger, R. L., Scofield Bruno, R. G., Wade Hoogkamp, M. A., Reyes, L. E., & Barnaby, G. H. (2004). Examining the decision of students’ cheating behavior: An empirical study. Business Ethics Quarterly, 50, 397–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blatt, M., & Kohlberg, L. (1975). The effect of classroom moral discussion upon children’s level of moral judgment. Journal of Moral Education, 4, 129–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B. (1995). The academic ethics of graduate business students: A survey. Journal of Education for Business, 70, 151–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buff, C. L., & Yonkers, V. (2004). Are we educating our graduates to be ethical marketers? Ethics education in AACSB undergraduate marketing programs. Proceedings of the American Marketing Association, 20–26, Winter.

  • Burton, B. K., & Near, J. P. (1995). Estimating the incidence of wrong doing and whistle-blowing: Results of a study using randomized response technique. Journal of Business Ethics, 14, 17–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jendrek, M. P. (1989). Faculty reactions to academic dishonesty. Journal of College Student Development, 30, 401–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johns, S. K., & Strand, C. A. (2000). Survey results of the ethical beliefs of business students. Journal of Education for Business, 75, 315–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, E. R. (1998). The one necessary condition for a successful business ethics course: The teacher must be a philosopher. Business Ethics Quarterly, 8, 561–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewellyn, P. A. G. (1996). Academic perceptions: Ethics in the information systems discipline. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 559–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, Y. P., Rechner, P. L., & Olson-Buchanan, J. B. (2005). Shaping ethical perceptions: An empirical assessment of the influence of business education, culture, and demographic factors. Journal of Business Ethics, 60, 341–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L. (1993). Faculty responses to academic dishonesty: The influence of student honor codes. Research in Higher Education, 34, 647–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L., Butterfield, K. D., & Trevino, L. T. (2006). Academic dishonesty in graduate business programs: Prevalence, causes, and proposed action. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5, 294–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L., & Trevino, L. K. (1993). Academic dishonesty: Honor codes and other contextual influences. Journal of Higher Education, 64, 522–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L., & Trevino, L. K. (1997). Individual and contextual influences on academic dishonesty: A multi-campus investigation. Research in Higher Education, 38, 379–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNair, F., & Milam, E. E. (1993). Ethics in accounting education: What is really being done. Journal of Business Ethics, 12, 797–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melchar, D. E., & Beauvais, L. L. (2005). The role of ethical culture and ethics education in the development of moral reasoning and judgment competence in business students. Eastern Academy of Management Proceedings, May 2005, Springfield, MA.

  • Menges, R. J. (1999). Appraising and improving your teaching: Using students, peers, experts, and classroom research. In W. J. McKeachie (Ed.) Teaching tips: Strategies, research, and theory for college and university teachers ((pp. 256–288)10st ed.). Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neilsen, R. P. (1998). Can ethical character be stimulated and enabled? An action-learning approach to teaching and learning organizational ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 8, 581–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, H. (1998). Can business ethics be taught? A new model of business ethics education. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 965–977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawwas, M. Y. A., & Isakson, H. R. (2000). Ethics of tomorrow’s business managers: The influence of personal beliefs and values, individual characteristics, and situational factors. Journal of Education for Business, 75, 321–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roig, M., & Ballew, C. (1994). Attitudes toward cheating of self and others by college students and professors. The Psychological Record, 44(1), 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozensher, S. G., & Fergenson, P. E. (1994). Business faculty perspectives on ethics: A national survey. Business Horizons, 37(4), 61–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims, R. R., & Brinkmann, J. (2003). Business ethics curriculum design: Suggestions and illustrations. Teaching Business Ethics, 7(1), 69–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solberg, J., Strong, K. C., & McGuire Jr., C. (1995). Living (not learning) ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 14, 71–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spain, J. W., Engle, A. D., & Thompson, J. C. (2005). Applying multiple methodologies in an ethics awareness week: Expectations, events, evaluation and enhancements. Journal of Business Ethics, 58, 7–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, R. E., Harris, O. J., & Williamson, S. (1993). A comparison of ethical evaluations of business school faculty and students: A pilot study. Journal of Business Ethics, 12, 611–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svinicki, M. D. (1999). Ethics in college teaching. In W. J. McKeachie (Ed.) Teaching tips: Strategies, research, and theory for college and university teachers ((pp. 289–311)10st ed.). Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney, R. B. (1993). Ethics for academics. Management Accounting, 74(8), 14.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David E. Desplaces.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beauvais, L.L., Desplaces, D.E., Melchar, D.E. et al. Business Faculty Perceptions and Actions Regarding Ethics Education. J Acad Ethics 5, 121–136 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-007-9046-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-007-9046-4

Keywords

Navigation