Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-07T15:36:09.842Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On testing the maturational left-right gradient hypothesis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2010

J. G. Beaumont
J. G. Beaumont
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, The University, Leicester LE1 7RH, England
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , June 1978 , pp. 280 - 281
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Annett, M.Laterality of childhood hemiplegia and the growth of speech and intelligence. Cortex. 9:4–33. 1973.Google Scholar
Brown, J. W., and Jaffe, J.Hypothesis on cerebral dominance. Neuropsychologia. 13:107–10. 1975.Google Scholar
Buffery, A. W. H.Sex differences in the development of hand preference; cerebral dominance for speech and cognitive skill. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society. 23:233. 1970.Google Scholar
Ellis, H. D., and Young, A. W.Age of acquisition and recognition of nouns presented in the left and right visual fields: a failed hypothesis, Neuropsychologia. 15:825–28. 1977.Google Scholar
Hécaen, H.Acquired aphasia in children and the ontogenesis of hemispheric functional specialization. Brain and Language. 3:114–34. 1976.Google Scholar
McFie, J.The effects of hemispherectomy on intellectual functioning in case of infantile hemiplegia. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry. 24:240–249. 1961Google Scholar
Neville, H. The functional significance of cerebral specialization. In: Rieber, R. W. (ed.), Neuropsychology of language. New York: Plenum Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Piazza, D. M.Cerebral lateralisation in young children as measured by dichotic listening and finger tapping tests. Neuropsychologia. 15:417–25. 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, R. J., and Berlin, C. I.On interpreting developmental changes in the dichotic right-ear advantage. Brain and Language. 2:186–200. 1975.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. T. E.Differential rates of cerebral maturation between sexes. Nature. 254:140. 1975.Google Scholar
Rudel, R., Teuber, H. L., and Twitchell, T. E.Levels of impairment of sensorimotor early damage. Neuropsychologia. 12:95–108. 1974.Google Scholar
Searleman, A.A review of right hemisphere linguistic capabilities. Psychological Bulletin. 84:503–28. 1977.Google Scholar
Selnes, O. A.The corpus callosum: some anatomical and functional considerations with special reference to language. Brain and Language. 1:111–39. 1974.Google Scholar
Smith, A. Dominant and non-dominant hemispherectomy. In: Kinsbourne, M. and Smith, W. L. (eds), Hemispheric disconnection and cerebral function. Springfield, Ill.: Charles C. Thomas, 1974.Google Scholar
Waber, D. P.Sex differences in mental abilities, hemispheric lateralisation and rate of physical growth in adolescence. Developmental Psychology. 13:29–38. 1977.Google Scholar
Wilson, P. J. E.Cerebral hemispherectomy for infantile hemiplegia: a report of 50 cases. Brain. 93:147–80. 1970.Google Scholar
Woods, B. T., and Teuber, H. L.Early onset of complementary specialization of cerebral hemispheres in man. Transactions of the American Neurological Association. 98:113–15. 1973.Google Scholar