Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T17:17:56.173Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

ASSIGNING AN ISOMORPHISM TYPE TO A HYPERDEGREE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 December 2019

HOWARD BECKER*
Affiliation:
PMB 128, 4711 FOREST DR., STE. 3 COLUMBIA, SC29206, USAE-mail: hsbecker@hotmail.com

Abstract

Let L be a computable vocabulary, let XL be the space of L-structures with universe ω and let $f:{2^\omega } \to {X_L}$ be a hyperarithmetic function such that for all $x,y \in {2^\omega }$, if $x{ \equiv _h}y$ then $f\left( x \right) \cong f\left( y \right)$. One of the following two properties must hold. (1) The Scott rank of f (0) is $\omega _1^{CK} + 1$. (2) For all $x \in {2^\omega },f\left( x \right) \cong f\left( 0 \right)$.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Symbolic Logic 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ash, C. J. and Knight, J. F., Computable Structures and the Hyperarithmetic Hierarchy, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 2000.Google Scholar
Becker, H., Strange structures from computable model theory. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, vol. 58 (2017), pp. 97105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, H. and Dougherty, R., On disjoint Borel uniformizations. Advances in Mathematics, vol. 146 (1999), pp. 167174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, H. and Kechris, A. S., The Descriptive Set Theory of Polish Group Actions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvert, W., Goncharov, S. S., and Knight, J. F., Computable structures of Scott rank $\omega _1^{CK}$in familiar classes, Advances in Logic (Gao, S., Jackson, S., and Zhang, Y., editors), Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 425, 2007, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, pp. 4966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvert, W., Knight, J. F., and Millar, J., Computable trees of Scott rank $\omega _1^{CK}$and computable approximation, this Journal, vol. 71 (2006), pp. 283289.Google Scholar
Chan, W., Harrison-Trainor, M., and Marks, A., Scott ranks of classifications of the admissibility equivalence relation, to appear.Google Scholar
Fokina, E., Knight, J. F., Melnikov, A., Quinn, S. M., and Safranski, C., Classes of Ulm type and coding rank-homogeneous trees in other structures, this Journal, vol. 76 (2011), pp. 846869.Google Scholar
Gao, S., Invariant Descriptive Set Theory, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2009.Google Scholar
Gregoriades, V., Kispeter, T., and Pauly, A., A comparison of concepts from computable analysis and effective descriptive set theory. Mathematical Structures in Computer Science, vol. 27 (2017), pp. 14141436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, L., Analytic determinacy and${0^\sharp }$., this Journal, vol. 43 (1978), pp. 685693.Google Scholar
Harrison-Trainor, M., Igusa, G., and Knight, J. F., Some new computable structures of high rank. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 146 (2018), pp. 30973109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hjorth, G., Classification and Orbit Equivalence Relations, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2000.Google Scholar
Kechris, A. S., The theory of countable analytical sets. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 202 (1975), pp. 259297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, J. F. and Millar, J., Computable structures of rank$\omega _1^{CK}$.. Journal of Mathematical Logic, vol. 10 (2010), pp. 3143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makkai, M., An example concerning Scott heights, this Journal, vol. 46 (1981), pp. 301318.Google Scholar
Marker, D., An analytic equivalence relation not arising from a Polish group action. Fundamenta Mathematicae, vol. 130 (1988), pp. 225228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marks, A., Slaman, T., and Steel, J., Martin’s conjecture, arithmetic equivalence, and countable Borel equivalence relations, Ordinal Definability and Recursion Theory (Kechris, A. S., Lowe, B., and Steel, J. R., editors), Lecture Notes in Logic, vol. 43, Association for Symbolic Logic, Ithaca, NY, 2016, pp. 493519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, D. A., Proof of a conjecture of Friedman. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 55 (1976), p. 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melnikov, A. and Montalban, A., Computable Polish group actions, this Journal, vol. 83 (2018), pp. 443460.Google Scholar
Montalban, A., A robuster Scott rank. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 143 (2015), pp. 54275436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montalban, A., Computable Structure Theory, to appear.Google Scholar
Moschovakis, Y. N., Descriptive Set Theory, Springer, Berlin, 1980 (Second edition, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2009).Google Scholar
Nadel, M., Scott sentences and admissible sets. Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 7 (1974), pp. 267294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sami, R. L., Polish group actions and the Vaught conjecture. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 341 (1994), pp. 335353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steel, J. R., Forcing with tagged trees. Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 15 (1978), pp. 5574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomason, S. K., The forcing method and the upper semilattice of hyperdegrees. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 129 (1967), pp. 3857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar