Skip to main content
Log in

Decomposing intentionality: Perspectives on intentionality drawn from language research with two species of chimpanzees

  • Published:
Biology and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In philosophy the term “intentionality” refers to the feature possessed by mental states of beingabout things others than themselves. A serious question has been how to explain the intentionality of mental states. This paper starts with linguistic representations, and explores how an organism might use linguistic symbols to represent other things. Two research projects of Sue Savage-Rumbaugh, one explicity teaching twopan troglodytes to use lexigrams intentionally, and the other exploring the ability of several members ofpan paniscus to learn lexigram use and comprehension of English speech spontaneously when raised in an appropriate environment, are examined to explore the acquisition process. Although it is controversial whether intentionality of mental states or linguistic symbols is primary, it is argued that the intentionality of linguistic symbols is primary and that studying how organisms learn to use linguistic symbols provides an avenue to understanding how intentionality is acquired by cognitive systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahamsen, A.A., Romski, M.A., Sevcik, R.A.: 1989, ‘Concomitants of Success in Acquiring an Augmentative Communication System: Changes in Attention, Communication, and Sociability’,American Journal of Mental Retardation 93, 425–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barsalou, L.W.: 1987, ‘The Instability of Graded Structures: Implications for the Nature of Concepts’, In U. Neisser (ed.),Concepts and Conceptual Development: Ecological and Intellectual Factors in Categorization, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, pp. 101–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, E. 1979,The Emergence of Symbols: Cognition and Communication in Infancy, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechtel, W. and Abrahamsen, A.A.: 1991,Connectionism and the Mind. An Introduction to Parallel Processing in Networks, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechtel, W. and Richardson, R.C.: 1992,Discovering Complexity: Decomposition and Localization as Scientific Research Strategies, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J.: 1978, ‘Some Remarks about Concepts’,The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1, 557–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, N.: 1986, ‘Advertisement for a Semantics for Psychology’, in P.A. French (ed.),Midwest Studies in Philosophy. Studies in the Philosophy of Mind. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 615–628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brentano, F.: 1874/1973,Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint (A.C. Panscurello, D.B. Terrell, and L.L. McAlister, trans.), Humanities Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J.: 1975, ‘The Ontogenesis of Speech Acts’,Journal of Child Language 2, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, P.M.: 1989,A Neurocomputational Perspective. The Nature of Mind and the Structure of Science, MIT Press/Bradford, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, P.S.: 1986,Neurophilosophy: Toward a Unified Science of the Mind-Brain, MIT Press/Bradford Books, Cambrdige, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deacon, T.: 1992,Symbolic Origins, W.W. Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D.C.: 1978,Brainstorms, MIT Press/Bradford Books, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D.C.: 1987,The Intentional Stance, MIT Press/Bradford Books, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dretske, F.I.: 1981,Knowledge and the Flow of Information, MIT Press/Bradford Books, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J.A.: 1980,The Language of Thought, Crowell, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J.A.: 1987,Psychosemantics: The Problem of Meaning in the Philosophy of Mind, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, B.T., and Gardner, R.A.: 1971, ‘Two-way Communication with an Infant Chimpanzee, in A.M. Schrier and F. Stollnitz (eds.),Behavior of Nonhuman Primates, Academic Press, New York, Vol. 4, pp. 117–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauker, C.: 1990, ‘How to Learn a Language like a Chimpanzee‘,Philosophical Psychology 3, 31–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, G.: 1973,Thought, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, K.J. and Hayes, C.: 1951, ‘The Intellectual Development of a Home-Raised Chimpanzee’,Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 95, 105–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellogg, W.N. and Kellogg, L.A.: 1933,The Ape and the Child, Whittlesey House, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosslyn, S.A., Flynn, R.A., Amsterdam, J.B. and Wang, G.: 1990, ‘Components of High-Level Vision: A Cognitive Neuroscience Analysis and Accounts of Neurological Syndromes’,Cognition 34, 203–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G.: 1987, ‘Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. What Categories Reveal about the Mind, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loar, B.: 1981,Mind and Meaning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lock, A.: 1980,The Guided Reinvention of Language, Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGinn, C.: 1982, ‘The Structure of Content’, in A. Woodfield (ed.),Thought and Object. Clarendon University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medin, D. and Barsalou, L.W.: 1987, ‘Categorization Processes and Categorical Perception’, in S. Harnad (ed.),Categorical Perception, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, pp. 455–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, U.: 1989, August, ‘Direct Perception and Recognition as Distinct Perceptual Systems’. Address presented to the Cognitive Science Society.

  • Premack, D.: 1976,Language and Intelligence in Ape and Man, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romski, M.A., Sevcik, R.A., Pate, J.L., and Rumbaugh, D.M.: 1985, ‘The Establishment of Symbolic Communication in Persons with Severe Retardation’,Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 53, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, E.: 1978, ‘Principles of Categorization’, in E. Rosch and B.B. Lloyd (eds.),Cognition and Categorization, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsale, NJ, pp. 27–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumbaugh, D.M. (ed.): 1977,Language Learning by a Chimpanzee: The LANA Project, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart, D.E., McClelland, J.L. and the PDP Research Group: 1986,Parallel Distributed Processing. Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, Volume 1: Foundations, MIT Press/Bradford Books, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B.: 1940,An Inquiry into Meaning and Truth, George Allen & Unwin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage-Rumbaugh, E.S.: 1984, ‘Pan Paniscus andPan Troglodytes: Contrasts in Preverbal Communicative Competence, in R.L. Susman (ed.),The Pygmy Chimpanzee: Evolutionary Biology and Behavior, Plenum, New York, pp. 395–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage-Rumbaugh, E.S.: 1986,Ape Language: From Conditioned Response to Symbol, Columbia, New York.

  • Savage-Rumbaugh, E.S.: 1990, ‘Language as a Cause-Effect Communication System,Philosophical Psychology 3, 55–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage-Rumbaugh, E.S., McDonald, K., Sevcik, R.A., Hopkins, W.D. and Rubert, E.: 1986, ‘Spontaneous Symbol Acquisition and Communicative Use by Pygmy Chimpanzees (Pan Paniscus)’,Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 115, 211–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage-Rumbaugh, E.S., Rumbaugh, D.M., Smith, S.T. and Lawson, J.: 1980, ‘Reference: The Linguistic Essential’,Science 210, 922–925.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage-Rumbaugh, E.S., Sevcik, R.A., Rumbaugh, D.M. and Rubert, E.: 1985, ‘The Capacity of Animals to Acquire Language: Do Species Differences have anything to Say to Us?’Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B308, 177–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayre, K.M.: 1986, ‘Intentionality and Information Processing: An Alternative Model for Cognitive Science’,Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9, 121–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schank, R.C. and Abelson, P.: 1977,Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J.R.: 1980, ‘Minds, Brains, and Programs’,Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, 417–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J.R.: 1983,Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, T.A. and Umiker-Sebeok, J.: 1980,Speaking of Apes: A Critical Anthology of Two-Way Communications with Man, Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellars, W.F. (1963), ‘Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind’, W.F. Sellars (ed.),Science, Perception, and Reality, New York: Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E.E. and Medin, D.L.: 1981,Categories and Concepts, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stich, S.: 1983,From Folk Psychology to Cognitive Science, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugarman, S.: 1983, ‘Why Talk? Comment on Savage-Rumbaugh, et al.’Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 112, 493–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terrace, H.S., Petitto, L.A., Sanders, R.J. and Bever, T.G.: 1979, ‘Can an Ape Create a Sentence?’Science 206, 891–900.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terrace, H.S.: 1979,Nim, Alfred A. Knopf, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bechtel, W. Decomposing intentionality: Perspectives on intentionality drawn from language research with two species of chimpanzees. Biol Philos 8, 1–32 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00868503

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00868503

Key Words

Navigation