Abstract
In philosophy the term “intentionality” refers to the feature possessed by mental states of beingabout things others than themselves. A serious question has been how to explain the intentionality of mental states. This paper starts with linguistic representations, and explores how an organism might use linguistic symbols to represent other things. Two research projects of Sue Savage-Rumbaugh, one explicity teaching twopan troglodytes to use lexigrams intentionally, and the other exploring the ability of several members ofpan paniscus to learn lexigram use and comprehension of English speech spontaneously when raised in an appropriate environment, are examined to explore the acquisition process. Although it is controversial whether intentionality of mental states or linguistic symbols is primary, it is argued that the intentionality of linguistic symbols is primary and that studying how organisms learn to use linguistic symbols provides an avenue to understanding how intentionality is acquired by cognitive systems.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrahamsen, A.A., Romski, M.A., Sevcik, R.A.: 1989, ‘Concomitants of Success in Acquiring an Augmentative Communication System: Changes in Attention, Communication, and Sociability’,American Journal of Mental Retardation 93, 425–496.
Barsalou, L.W.: 1987, ‘The Instability of Graded Structures: Implications for the Nature of Concepts’, In U. Neisser (ed.),Concepts and Conceptual Development: Ecological and Intellectual Factors in Categorization, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, pp. 101–140.
Bates, E. 1979,The Emergence of Symbols: Cognition and Communication in Infancy, Academic Press, New York.
Bechtel, W. and Abrahamsen, A.A.: 1991,Connectionism and the Mind. An Introduction to Parallel Processing in Networks, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
Bechtel, W. and Richardson, R.C.: 1992,Discovering Complexity: Decomposition and Localization as Scientific Research Strategies, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Bennett, J.: 1978, ‘Some Remarks about Concepts’,The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1, 557–590.
Block, N.: 1986, ‘Advertisement for a Semantics for Psychology’, in P.A. French (ed.),Midwest Studies in Philosophy. Studies in the Philosophy of Mind. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 615–628.
Brentano, F.: 1874/1973,Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint (A.C. Panscurello, D.B. Terrell, and L.L. McAlister, trans.), Humanities Press, New York.
Bruner, J.: 1975, ‘The Ontogenesis of Speech Acts’,Journal of Child Language 2, 1–19.
Churchland, P.M.: 1989,A Neurocomputational Perspective. The Nature of Mind and the Structure of Science, MIT Press/Bradford, Cambridge, Mass.
Churchland, P.S.: 1986,Neurophilosophy: Toward a Unified Science of the Mind-Brain, MIT Press/Bradford Books, Cambrdige, Mass.
Deacon, T.: 1992,Symbolic Origins, W.W. Norton, New York.
Dennett, D.C.: 1978,Brainstorms, MIT Press/Bradford Books, Cambridge, Mass.
Dennett, D.C.: 1987,The Intentional Stance, MIT Press/Bradford Books, Cambridge, Mass.
Dretske, F.I.: 1981,Knowledge and the Flow of Information, MIT Press/Bradford Books, Cambridge, Mass.
Fodor, J.A.: 1980,The Language of Thought, Crowell, New York.
Fodor, J.A.: 1987,Psychosemantics: The Problem of Meaning in the Philosophy of Mind, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Gardner, B.T., and Gardner, R.A.: 1971, ‘Two-way Communication with an Infant Chimpanzee, in A.M. Schrier and F. Stollnitz (eds.),Behavior of Nonhuman Primates, Academic Press, New York, Vol. 4, pp. 117–184.
Gauker, C.: 1990, ‘How to Learn a Language like a Chimpanzee‘,Philosophical Psychology 3, 31–53.
Harman, G.: 1973,Thought, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Hayes, K.J. and Hayes, C.: 1951, ‘The Intellectual Development of a Home-Raised Chimpanzee’,Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 95, 105–109.
Kellogg, W.N. and Kellogg, L.A.: 1933,The Ape and the Child, Whittlesey House, New York.
Kosslyn, S.A., Flynn, R.A., Amsterdam, J.B. and Wang, G.: 1990, ‘Components of High-Level Vision: A Cognitive Neuroscience Analysis and Accounts of Neurological Syndromes’,Cognition 34, 203–277.
Lakoff, G.: 1987, ‘Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. What Categories Reveal about the Mind, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Loar, B.: 1981,Mind and Meaning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
Lock, A.: 1980,The Guided Reinvention of Language, Academic Press, London.
McGinn, C.: 1982, ‘The Structure of Content’, in A. Woodfield (ed.),Thought and Object. Clarendon University Press, Oxford.
Medin, D. and Barsalou, L.W.: 1987, ‘Categorization Processes and Categorical Perception’, in S. Harnad (ed.),Categorical Perception, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, pp. 455–490.
Neisser, U.: 1989, August, ‘Direct Perception and Recognition as Distinct Perceptual Systems’. Address presented to the Cognitive Science Society.
Premack, D.: 1976,Language and Intelligence in Ape and Man, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
Romski, M.A., Sevcik, R.A., Pate, J.L., and Rumbaugh, D.M.: 1985, ‘The Establishment of Symbolic Communication in Persons with Severe Retardation’,Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 53, 1–14.
Rosch, E.: 1978, ‘Principles of Categorization’, in E. Rosch and B.B. Lloyd (eds.),Cognition and Categorization, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsale, NJ, pp. 27–28.
Rumbaugh, D.M. (ed.): 1977,Language Learning by a Chimpanzee: The LANA Project, Academic Press, New York.
Rumelhart, D.E., McClelland, J.L. and the PDP Research Group: 1986,Parallel Distributed Processing. Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, Volume 1: Foundations, MIT Press/Bradford Books, Cambridge, Mass.
Russell, B.: 1940,An Inquiry into Meaning and Truth, George Allen & Unwin, London.
Savage-Rumbaugh, E.S.: 1984, ‘Pan Paniscus andPan Troglodytes: Contrasts in Preverbal Communicative Competence, in R.L. Susman (ed.),The Pygmy Chimpanzee: Evolutionary Biology and Behavior, Plenum, New York, pp. 395–413.
Savage-Rumbaugh, E.S.: 1986,Ape Language: From Conditioned Response to Symbol, Columbia, New York.
Savage-Rumbaugh, E.S.: 1990, ‘Language as a Cause-Effect Communication System,Philosophical Psychology 3, 55–76.
Savage-Rumbaugh, E.S., McDonald, K., Sevcik, R.A., Hopkins, W.D. and Rubert, E.: 1986, ‘Spontaneous Symbol Acquisition and Communicative Use by Pygmy Chimpanzees (Pan Paniscus)’,Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 115, 211–235.
Savage-Rumbaugh, E.S., Rumbaugh, D.M., Smith, S.T. and Lawson, J.: 1980, ‘Reference: The Linguistic Essential’,Science 210, 922–925.
Savage-Rumbaugh, E.S., Sevcik, R.A., Rumbaugh, D.M. and Rubert, E.: 1985, ‘The Capacity of Animals to Acquire Language: Do Species Differences have anything to Say to Us?’Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B308, 177–185.
Sayre, K.M.: 1986, ‘Intentionality and Information Processing: An Alternative Model for Cognitive Science’,Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9, 121–166.
Schank, R.C. and Abelson, P.: 1977,Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
Searle, J.R.: 1980, ‘Minds, Brains, and Programs’,Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, 417–424.
Searle, J.R.: 1983,Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
Sebeok, T.A. and Umiker-Sebeok, J.: 1980,Speaking of Apes: A Critical Anthology of Two-Way Communications with Man, Plenum, New York.
Sellars, W.F. (1963), ‘Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind’, W.F. Sellars (ed.),Science, Perception, and Reality, New York: Humanities Press.
Smith, E.E. and Medin, D.L.: 1981,Categories and Concepts, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Stich, S.: 1983,From Folk Psychology to Cognitive Science, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Sugarman, S.: 1983, ‘Why Talk? Comment on Savage-Rumbaugh, et al.’Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 112, 493–497.
Terrace, H.S., Petitto, L.A., Sanders, R.J. and Bever, T.G.: 1979, ‘Can an Ape Create a Sentence?’Science 206, 891–900.
Terrace, H.S.: 1979,Nim, Alfred A. Knopf, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bechtel, W. Decomposing intentionality: Perspectives on intentionality drawn from language research with two species of chimpanzees. Biol Philos 8, 1–32 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00868503
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00868503