Abstract
In a previous paper recently published in this journal, we argue that the two main theories of carcinogenesis (SMT and TOFT) should be considered as compatible, at the metaphysical, epistemological and biological levels. In a reply to our contribution, Bizzarri and Cucina claim we are wrong since SMT and TOFT are opposite and incompatible paradigms. Here, we show that their arguments are not satisfactory. Indeed, the authors go through the same mistakes that we already addressed. In particular, they confuse reductionism, as an ontological frame, and genetic determinism, as a causal pathway. Beside, they make an inadequate use of the Kuhnian notion of paradigm shift. Finally, we confirm our previous conclusion: there is no strong argument to totally abandon the somatic mutation theory. It describes a partial causal pathway, compatible with the one proposed by TOFT.
References
Bedessem B, Ruphy S (2015) Smt or toft? How the two main theories of carcinogenesis are made (artificially) incompatible. Acta Biotheor 63(3):257–267. doi:10.1007/s10441-015-9252-1
Bizzarri M, Cucina A (2016) Smt and toft: why and how they are opposite and incompatible paradigms. Acta Biotheor. doi:10.1007/s10441-016-9281-4
Kim J (1988) Mind in a physical world. The MIT Press, Cambridge
Kuhn TS (1962) The structure of scientific revolution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Rosenfeld S (2013) Are the somatic mutation and tissue organization field theories of carcinogenesis incompatible? Cancer Inform 12:221–229. doi:10.4137/CIN.S13013
Soto AM, Sonnenschein C (2011) The tissue organization field theory of cancer: a testable replacement for the somatic mutation theory. Bioessays 33(5):332–340. doi:10.1002/bies.201100025
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bedessem, B., Ruphy, S. SMT and TOFT Integrable After All: A Reply to Bizzarri and Cucina. Acta Biotheor 65, 81–85 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10441-016-9286-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10441-016-9286-z